|
|
|
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 12:26:18 PM
|
|
|
Leslie_JnJs_mom
Posts: 841
Joined: 9/6/2007
From: SW Missouri
Status: offline
|
They were talking about this on the morning news. Some people think You Tube should have to answer for this too. I do not see how they can but there is a problem with kids posting stuff like this for fun.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,375663,00.html
_____________________________
<-------- She really loves her daddy!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 12:29:39 PM
|
|
|
uncabeeil
Posts: 5877
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Joisey. Got a problem wit dat?
Status: offline
|
I don't see how You Tube can be held in any way responsible. It's not like they said "post your videos of launching babies here".
_____________________________
Sniglet of the day:Deodorend - n. The last 1/2 inch of stick deodorant that won't turn up out of the tube, and thus cannot be used without inducing lacerations.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 12:32:59 PM
|
|
|
shadowspring
Posts: 1516
Joined: 5/27/2006
Status: offline
|
I think you YouTube should receive a letter of commendation for the valuable public forum they provide, whereby idiot criminals help law enforcement limit their damage to the community by videotaping their crimes and posting them on the public forum.
Imagine! This baby lives with this thoughtless cruel teen. If the boy hadn't posted his idiocy on YouTube, the baby would still be in danger.
Three cheers for YouTube!
_____________________________
"All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost..." -J. R. R. Tolkien
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 1:07:21 PM
|
|
|
Sideways
Posts: 2528
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
I kinda agree with Shadowspring. YouTube certainly doesn't encourage this kind of thing, in fact, they've been known to remove and report this stuff fairly quickly.
And it does give the idiot criminals a chance to out themselves and protect the people they want to hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 1:26:37 PM
|
|
|
creationtalk
Posts: 583
Joined: 6/9/2005
Status: online
|
YouTube should not be held responsible for the stupid things people do, even if said people place them on YouTube.
Should we sue the automaker when some teen decides it's fun to speed down a dirt road then spin the car in the gravel and ends up harming someone? This is pretty much the same thing.
YouTube provides a forum for people to share videos. They do not and cannot (and should not) police every video that is posted. If they began requiring that every video be approved before posting, then who decides if the video is worthy of posting? Things that we might WANT posted might be censored due to content.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 2:13:10 PM
|
|
|
Leslie_JnJs_mom
Posts: 841
Joined: 9/6/2007
From: SW Missouri
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: shadowspring
I think you YouTube should receive a letter of commendation for the valuable public forum they provide, whereby idiot criminals help law enforcement limit their damage to the community by videotaping their crimes and posting them on the public forum.
Imagine! This baby lives with this thoughtless cruel teen. If the boy hadn't posted his idiocy on YouTube, the baby would still be in danger.
Three cheers for YouTube!
I like that!
_____________________________
<-------- She really loves her daddy!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 2:15:59 PM
|
|
|
cindybode
Posts: 1552
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Northwest PA
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: creationtalk
YouTube should not be held responsible for the stupid things people do, even if said people place them on YouTube.
Agreed. I'd love to hear the convoluted thinking that results in the idea that You Tube is responsible.
_____________________________
If you lock in any creature, from rats to chickens to pigs to people, 10 to 30 or more in a box and force feed them you'll create little monsters. Confinement Education School Operations (CESOs) just don't compare to naturally pastured free-ranged kids.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 3:30:33 PM
|
|
|
Kat_D
Posts: 3222
Joined: 9/2/2005
From: Where We Shake, Rattle & Roll!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Leslie_JnJs_mom
They were talking about this on the morning news. Some people think You Tube should have to answer for this too. I do not see how they can but there is a problem with kids posting stuff like this for fun.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,375663,00.html
Holding u-tube responsible or not is not the issue. As I have said before, what you are seeing in this and other videos like the one with the teen girl being beaten by her peers, is a Godless generation in action. Just the fact that this boy would videotape and publicly post it, proves it. He likely saw nothing wrong with his reprehensible treatment of this innocent baby...no, he was proud of it and boasted about it.
1 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God..." II Timothy 3
Without God, men lose their affection for one another...as the Bible said it would be.
_____________________________
~Kat
"...And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes...no more death, sorrow, nor crying."
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 4:31:11 PM
|
|
|
Calea37
Posts: 718
Joined: 10/2/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kat_D
Holding u-tube responsible or not is not the issue. As I have said before, what you are seeing in this and other videos like the one with the teen girl being beaten by her peers, is a Godless generation in action. Just the fact that this boy would videotape and publicly post it, proves it. He likely saw nothing wrong with his reprehensible treatment of this innocent baby...no, he was proud of it and boasted about it.
1 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God..." II Timothy 3
Without God, men lose their affection for one another...as the Bible said it would be.
You are right, Kat...
Also, if anyone should be held responsible (in addition to the morons who actually did this) it should be the PARENTS of the baby who left their infant with a sixteen year old teenage boy!
_____________________________
Calea
Isaiah 2:22 Stop trusting in man, who has but a breath in his nostrils. Of what account is he?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 4:39:29 PM
|
|
|
2shaye
Posts: 5144
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: So. Cal.
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Calea37
Also, if anyone should be held responsible (in addition to the morons who actually did this) it should be the PARENTS of the baby who left their infant with a sixteen year old teenage boy!
Calea, are you saying that 16 year old teenaged boys are not trustworthy with an infant? Or did you mean this one in particular?
_____________________________
aka Skipperjoe
I Love New York!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 4:57:16 PM
|
|
|
Calea37
Posts: 718
Joined: 10/2/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2shaye
quote:
ORIGINAL: Calea37
Also, if anyone should be held responsible (in addition to the morons who actually did this) it should be the PARENTS of the baby who left their infant with a sixteen year old teenage boy!
Calea, are you saying that 16 year old teenaged boys are not trustworthy with an infant? Or did you mean this one in particular?
No, I wouldn't say that every 16yo boy is untrustworthy; I know there are plenty who are.
The news clip said that this teen had "never been in trouble before" making it sound as though this was just some out of the blue random thing. I seriously doubt that. Just because the teen had never gotten into trouble with the law (as he will now) I believe that a teen who would do this would have given plenty of signs that he wasn't an appropriate caregiver for an infant. What he did was so evil and cruel that there is no way it was a one time thing. I think the parents were negligent in leaving that poor baby with him and they should be held responsible along with the teen; not youtube!
_____________________________
Calea
Isaiah 2:22 Stop trusting in man, who has but a breath in his nostrils. Of what account is he?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 6:29:00 PM
|
|
|
Jenny-Fair
Posts: 6581
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: WA
Status: online
|
I agree that if the parents saw no signs of problems previous to this, then they weren't parenting ANY of their children.
_____________________________
Matthew 18:1-6...anyone causes one of these little ones...to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 6:46:47 PM
|
|
|
Mrs.Wifey
Posts: 4653
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: The Gorgeous plains of Colorado
Status: offline
|
What a horrible video! The poor baby, I have a 10 month old and the though of someone doing that to my baby makes me cry. Seriously, I had to turn the video off.
It's not Youtube's fault that some people are morons. At least this one got caught.
_____________________________
Ryanne Gabriella Alexis born 8-22-07!
The opinions stated in the above post are solely mine and in no way should they be
construed as offensive due to your own insecurity.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/3/2008 8:16:37 PM
|
|
|
DreadPirateRandy
Posts: 9279
Joined: 6/5/2006
Status: offline
|
That video almost made me vomit.
He should be forced to listen to Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen Degeneres as means of torture.
_____________________________
I'm bringing sleazy back.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/4/2008 12:24:47 AM
|
|
|
locomom
Posts: 242
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
Although it's disturbing that these two committed this act, it's more so that they then desired to post it for others. The bragging about that follows makes the whole scenario extra disturbing. I'm glad the news states that the baby is OK, but I think they should not post the video.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Should you tube be held responsible - 7/4/2008 12:51:45 AM
|
|
|
karlie
Posts: 16592
Joined: 4/10/2005
From: Central California
Status: online
|
quote:
What a horrible video! The poor baby, I have a 10 month old and the though of someone doing that to my baby makes me cry. Seriously, I had to turn the video off.
Me too. I was shocked and started bawling. I couldn't even watch it anymore. I can't not comprehend people being so cruel and heartless to an innocent baby.
_____________________________
Shoes CAN change your life...just ask Cinderella
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
I hope the judge is not merciful. My 8 year old would know better than to do that to a baby. 
, while watching the video, I did watch the whole thing, and the baby landed in front of the TV, and he could have landed on the TV. HE 
. ARRRGH.