|
Doghouse -> RE: Praying to the Saints & Mary? (11/6/2009 2:17:24 PM)
|
quote:
Why can't you just trust that God has provided what we need to know in His Holy Scriptures as they testify? Paul taught we are not to go beyond what is written. (1Cor 4:6) From St. Paul: quote:
I urge you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree in what you say, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and in the same purpose. For it has been reported to me about you, my brothers, by Chloe's people, that there are rivalries among you. I mean that each of you is saying, "I belong to Paul," or "I belong to Apollos," or "I belong to Cephas," or "I belong to Christ." Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?...For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with the wisdom of human eloquence, so that the cross of Christ might not be emptied of its meaning. The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the learning of the learned I will set aside." When I see "written" in regard to Paul, I think "Old Testament", as Matt, Mark, Luke and John had not even been penned yet, and to believe that Paul is saying what you claim would mean that Matt, Mark, Luke and John were "adding to", which - they are obviously were not. Paul is comfortable with "proclaim" as it relates to the "present tense" spread of the Gospel message as revealed by God, and I accept that we use an understanding of tradition passed to us to aid our interpretation and to lend context to what has been passed to us as writings. I acknowledge that you disagree with this. I don't believe that the lack of a written Gospel invalidates the witness of Andrew to the Gospel of Jesus. It simply means that the witness is preserved for us in tradition, not Scripture. Jesus did not err when selecting Andrew, and Andrew did not err in not writing anything down, but rather spending his time in Cappadocia, Galatia, and Bithynia, then in the Scythian deserts, and afterwards in Byzantium itself, where he appointed St. Stachys as its first bishop, and finally in Thrace, Macedonia, Thessaly, and Achaia. It is generally agreed that he was crucified by order of the Roman Governor, Aegeas or Aegeates, at Patrae in Achaia, and that he was bound, not nailed, to the cross, in order to prolong his sufferings. We know (as best we can) this type of thing from the writings of Origen, Gregory, Jerome and others, who breathe life into the story of Andrew as a real person, and not just some folk character, or mythological hero. His witness to Jesus is as valid and as personal as any other Apostle, and he left behind followers and people that he had instructed and engaged in spreading the Gospel message of Jesus. quote:
which is declared to be all we need for our salvation to be complete. (2Tim 3:15) Scriptures are indeed capable of giving one wisdom for salvation, if one can render and discern them correctly. That's what we are all arguing about here. "Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation" - Peter said this, as well. "for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." I believe Peter is referring to a ministry (any ministry - Protestant or Catholic) and the authority of Church here (any Church, Protestant or Catholic - over the individual believer), and again is clear to distinguish the authority of "human beings moved by the holy Spirit" from "personal interpretation". Again - a difference I see between what you believe and what I believe.
|
|
|
|