|
FurGodWurLivin -> RE: I need info on IHOP with Mike Bickle! Please! (11/5/2009 10:35:16 AM)
|
quote:
When I was reading this post Saturday, I was almost in disbelief at this particular response. Rather than it being "Done" or even near done, there is no disavowal in the link, and there likely never will be. This is what happens when we have Christian believers who wander into the quagmire of Joyner/Bickle/NAR/Elijah List religion. Criticism only comes from those who are in need of being critiqued themselves, is the mentality. You have a group that is dedicated to the idea that turning away from what's been shown to be wrong (what they've been caught on) is all that's needed, rather than following the Biblical admonition. Deuteronomy 18:22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him. Well, I should congratulate you on actually offering a rebuttal. However, this is once again an empty proof-text that is being used to prove opinion. The very fact that there was an admission that some of the criticism is valid means that something has been learned. You are forgetting that this means that to some degree people who criticize the KCP moment in time were correct according to Mike Bickle. If what you are still worried about is that there isn't a massive "oh what I wretch I am!" statement, you are really expecting too much. Why? Because if we were to start going over your doctrines, teachings and other multifarious public interactions, I'm sure that we would find a few blemishes as well. It isn't a matter of criticism "only coming from those who need critiquing themselves", but it is a matter of criticism that is offered in a spirit of fellowship as opposed to a spirit of sadistic pleasure. As you made perfectly clear by your use of your proof-text, it isn't merely a turning away from wrong doctrine that you are searching for... rather, it is a conforming to what you believe to be correct doctrine. Honestly, that isn't exactly helpful because I'm not willing to accept you as the objective standard of all doctrine. Not that it is anything personal, I just don't have that much faith in humanity. The really fun part of Deuteronomy 18 is verse 22 gets held aloft as the standard of a "prophet", to the glossing over of verse 23 that says if a thing does come to pass and that prophet says "let us go after other gods" then he is to be stoned. What does that tell me? Focusing merely on accuracy is just as much of a danger as is not paying attention at all. However, I am encouraged that this is the ONE thing you still had a stomach to argue about after my last response.quote:
Now, on a completely unrelated note: Adam, do you by chance write reviews for a certain Christian music and movie review site? You don't have to reply here. PM me if you want. Uh, not really. I have written a couple for my blog, but that is about the extent of my expertise in that particular area. Any particular reason for asking?quote:
Who's talking about(sp) Bickle's finances(sp)? This thread is about his heretical doctrines If you look further up the thread, you will see that sir wintery leveled several charges about the great financial scam that Mike Bickle and IHOP-KC "obviously must be".quote:
"In January 2002, the Word of the Lord came, saying, 'I am raising up a global Bridegroom fast; ask Me to release one hundred million believers worldwide to come before Me in one accord for three days each month until I return.' " It does not surprise me that this "word" appears unsigned on the IHOP website. LINK Here we have the IHOP website telling us that "God" is saying to someone to ask Him to "release one hundred million believers". To "release" them? A vague usage of "binding and loosing", but where are they being held captive? They are believers...so God wants them "in one accord for three days"? No. This is what happens when we have a Bible-like wording being used to make something sound like "the Word of the Lord". Okay... so let me see the logic here... IHOP-KC should not be making prophetic claims because of who gave them. Here, IHOP-KC publishes a prophetic word that was relevant to our ministry with no indication who gave it... and it is still wrong? Intriguing. Basically, you do not trust anything that smacks of the prophetic. As delightful an idea as that may be to the human intellect, let me explain your misconceptions. By not giving the name of the speaker, it should be clear to the reader that the person giving the word is irrelevant in the perspective of the ministry. If we truly believe in the priesthood of all believers, that shouldn't be a big hurdle. Secondly, if something is prophetic and not merely a good idea, then yes, it is God giving that mandate. Third, the term "release one hundred million believers" is not actually a reference to the "binding and loosing" bit in Matthew. Rather, it is a term that gets used to ask God to "raise up, establish, bring forth" (to use the amplified language) something. Once again, you have to ask yourself... if there were 100 million Christians who all spent three days fasting as the Body of Christ, would that be a bad thing? If your answer is yes, I would suggest you take a gander at your New Testament again.quote:
It's also blatant Dominionism. You know that little heresy that Bickle and IHOP deny they practice Sir, the only way on God's green Earth to read dominionism into the example you have quoted is to approach it with a highly biased mind that is expecting to find it there. How is God telling someone to ask Him to raise up 100 million believers to fast and pray ACTUALLY a dominionist teaching? It is not related to taking over governments, restoring nature (per se), or even establishing righteousness in the unsaved populations of the earth. Once again, I find that you are arguing against a phantom that does not exist in the real world.quote:
Here's an article with quotes from Bickle and Bob Jones and much more. LINK quote: Mike Bickle also connected with Kansas City Prophets spoke of the anointed men who will represent this New Wave. "There's Apostles, there's Imminent Apostles and there's MOST IMMINENT APOSTLES. . . . There's various levels of Apostles and the Lord was showing that. . . . out of This Movement there would be 35 apostles. . .that will be of the highest level of apostolic ministry. . .the whole government of this movement in its highest level in all places it goes. . . .the government rests on Apostles and Prophets......Though I believe there will be hundreds of apostles in this movement and every movement will have its apostles and prophets, I believe God, He's merging Apostles in a number of movements now and He's going to add prophets to the prophets that are already there and He's going to bring us to higher statures." (Visions & Revelations, Kansas City Fellowship.) When someone starts talking to you about Apostles, they're saying that someone has authority over _you_ in spiritual matters and in all matters. Yeah...they have Dominion...if you let 'em. The article is called "Dominion Theology and Joel's Army". As much as I would love to rip this article to shreds and use it for kindling this winter, I am not arguing with the author of the article, I am arguing with you. On that note, I am going to clarify several points that the article you quoted make in error. First, the "old ways" of the church are not necessarily "righteousness and consecration". Rather, the old paths are Christology and intimacy with God. In that statement alone, I can tell that the author of the article is approaching Christianity from the rather typical "grit your teeth and do better" train of thought that has plagued the American Church for the last 150 years. Secondly, the article fails to distinguish between the usage of the term "Joel's Army" in the Latter Rain movement of 1950's and the usage of the same by Bob Jones and Mike Bickle in the 1980's. When Bob Jones and Mike Bickle use the term, they are not referring to either of the physical armies that are represented in Joel 2, but rather are referring to a company of believers that purposefully live out the mandate of fasting, prayer, and weeping between the porch and the altar that God may have mercy. In this, the author actually does his own cause great disservice in that he has failed to distinguish which enemy he is fighting against, and has shown his own lack of research into his sources. FAIL Thirdly, I have no problem believing that there will be Apostles. Why? Because I don't really have a problem with the idea of authority. Much the Anarchist that I am, I also have a very realistic sense of the need for structure. We have bosses at our jobs, we have hierarchical family structures, we even have bosses in our social behavior (police officers), and yet we think that the one place we have no need of structure is in the church. However, it is our specific lack of structure that has lead to most of the doctrinal schisms in Western Evangelicalism in the first place. As I have told many of my friends, one of the main reasons I have fallen out of love with the Evangelical movement is that it is one of the few theosophical movements that simultaneously worships and crushes free thought. Lastly, declaring that there will be a government structure is not specifically dominionist. Why? Because the Bible itself declares that there will be a Millennial Kingdom with an ordained bureaucracy. Jesus even told His disciples that they would sit on twelves thrones and judge the twelve tribes of Israel. As cool of a promise as that is, you have to remember that there are currently 212 nations on the planet adding up to well over 5000 different ethnic groups, and Jesus dedicates 12 spots in His coming government to govern 12 clans of one single ethnic group. Once again, the complaint does not stand up to logic and should therefore be rejected. Adam
|
|
|
|