|
TheosCentric -> RE: War in Iraq (11/10/2009 5:01:17 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rlj quote:
ORIGINAL: wing2000 quote:
This is a conflict that cannot possibly be won if the hard line critics of Islam are correct, so why did so many of them support this war in the first place knowing it cannot possibly be won because of the religion of 96% of the populace? good question. Interesting thought I had Wing. Some of the same people calling Muslims a bunch of terrorists who need eliminating are some of the same ones telling us "on the right track, stay the course, 100 years of never ending tours until the job is done". I just don't get it. It's a misunderstanding of other religions in light of their own ethnocentric (read: redneck American) mindset. The Bush Administration had no idea of the type of tribal warfare that would ensue upon removing Sadaam from power, even though we were not under any threat from Sadaam. People associate terrorism with Islam, but terrorism is really associated with any idea that may seek to strike terror to accomplish a goal. Timothy McVeigh comes to mind. Eric Rudolph, they guy who killed George Tiller, Mormons could be considered terrorists in the 1800's, the Crusaders could be considered terrorists, the Hindus have been killing the Christians in India, both Christians and Muslims were terrorizing each other in Lebanon, Jewish terrorists bombed the King David Hotel before Israeli statehood, etc. Terrorism is not just limited to one ideology or religion, but that's what people see, particularly Americans. They ignore the fact that terrorism against Christians in India has been on the rise in recent years by Hindus. The Catholics aren't too kind to Christians in South America either. The short of it is ignorance.
|
|
|
|