|
Covaan_Meshuga -> RE: Why do you think God wanted us to worship Him at the new moon worship initially? (5/4/2008 4:23:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Giulia quote:
Okay, with regard to worship G-d on the New Moon, that happens to be Monday/Tuesday here. We (my community) do worship the L-rd in a special way on the New Moon, but not with sacrifice, since there is no Temple. We simply say some special prayers in observance, and we often eat together afterward, then schmooze for awhile. That's it. That is what I am wondering, we know that after a while that became an abomination because the people's heart's weren't right, but specifically people were to worship God at the new moon and I am wondering why that was special and a requirement? It is obvious it has a special significance, just like the way the Holy place and Holy of Holies was set up to the requirement so this was a requirement, do you think the people's prayers were more pure then? We know the moon affects monthly cycles and has effects on bodies of water, would this have been a hindarance to the people when they sought God? As I wrote above, quote:
ORIGINAL: Abiyah This is simply for the worship of G-d, recognition of Him as Creator of the ourselves, the world, of the times that bring about growth and rest from growth, and of the week. quote:
ORIGINAL: Abiyah But moon dust? I thought that was just in Walt Disney (and I am not being fascetious -- I am asking). quote:
ORIGINAL: Giulia Welllllll,I do like Disney film[:D], but was watching this science program about this haze or particles the moon rays give out to the earth and thought that perhaps there was something unclean in that. Perhaps this question is a little advanced for this forum though........it is obvious I have been misunderstood and misquoted. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Yeah, I like the science channels, too, but they certainly do not make complete studies, do they. And often, when they try to teach about the Bible, they are so far off that the children at my place of worship could correct them, using Scripture. Since they are that far off with regard to the Bible, I would not trust them regarding science either without secondary proofs.
|
|
|
|