|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting
View related threads:
(in this forum
| in all forums)
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:09:01 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
I guess I'm just one of those silly people who still thinks killing is wrong regardless of the situation. That is your personal chioce that I respect and in Texas you are not required to kill anyone quote:
Maybe I'm even sillier to think that pulling up for a lethal shot at someone running away is even worse. Once again, personal choice that I respect, not required to kill anyone. quote:
Maybe I'm silliest for putting God's Laws about Texas's. Which one is that?
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:14:06 PM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1428
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rnershigh This criminal had already tried to break into this man's house once. He decided to give it another go. He paid with his life. Simple as that. It's the law in Texas that a owner can defend their property, and obviously Texans know this. So this criminal was taking a risk and he lost. I'm not rejoicing his death. I'm just saddened this person found it necessary to resort to burglary. How would shooting someone who is running off your property be defending it?
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:14:13 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
So are you happy he was shot the second time? I am not happy he was shot the first time but the law is on the side of the homeowner quote:
Again, most criminals don't understand the notion of planning ahead or worrying about consequences. Which we are not responsible for, they are quote:
Unless we want anarchy, this is normally the government's job. If by goverment you mean the police, the police have no legal obligation to protect you quote:
Except, of course, the kid's family might want revenge, so he might have just gotten himself into a world of trouble. Could be quote:
If you shot my son, I'd understand if you thought he was threatening you. Law or not, if you killed my son while he was running away, I'd be tempted to ensure there was a revenge killing of another sort. And after everything is done, after we've plucked out everybody's eyes, everyone's blind. You are free to make that choice, just as your son would be free to make their choice
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:15:49 PM
|
|
|
1love1God1way
Posts: 1984
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn quote:
Maybe I'm silliest for putting God's Laws about Texas's. Which one is that? The not killing one. Unless you see justification in Scripture for purposely killing someone who was taking mere material possessions from you.
_____________________________
-Ben-
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:16:11 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
How would shooting someone who is running off your property be defending it? Running away from you does not mean it is over. What if he were running and after 50' turned and shot you?
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:18:48 PM
|
|
|
1love1God1way
Posts: 1984
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn quote:
How would shooting someone who is running off your property be defending it? Running away from you does not mean it is over. What if he were running and after 50' turned and shot you? What if that thug looking guy I casually past on the street today was going to turn and shoot me? I should have just taken him out when I had the chance.
_____________________________
-Ben-
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:19:35 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
The not killing one. Context? quote:
Unless you see justification in Scripture for purposely killing someone who was taking mere material possessions from you. I do see it. So I have broke into your house in the middle of the night and I tell you "I am here to just take mere possesions, do not defend yourself". Would you rest easy and say, "ok, just lock up after you leave"?
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:20:50 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
What if that thug looking guy I casually past on the street today was going to turn and shoot me? Was he on your property uninvited becasue that is what we are discussing
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:23:57 PM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1428
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn quote:
How would shooting someone who is running off your property be defending it? Running away from you does not mean it is over. What if he were running and after 50' turned and shot you? Yeah, because burglars see breaking into peoples' apartments as a chess game, and if they can just move the bishop into position to draw the queen out, it's checkmate. In any case, running away if someone has a clear shot at you and you plan to return fire is a huge tactical misstep. You probably want to find the nearest cover, right?
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:25:45 PM
|
|
|
henny
Posts: 1282
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: MN
Status: offline
|
Here's the story about the Raymond Lemes guy that the article referenced. quote:
Carmen and Burnell Glass, two God-fearing cotton farmers from the fields of West Texas, are looking to a higher law these days in grappling with the sudden, violent death of their son. For others, the slaying of Tracy Glass raises questions embedded firmly in the Texas Penal Code. The case, experts said, hinges on whether a Northwest Side homeowner thought deadly force was his only option to protect himself or recover property when he chased the unarmed college student to the street and shot him to death. Raymond Lemes, 48, found Glass inside his house early Saturday morning. Believing Glass was an intruder, Lemes grabbed his .40-caliber handgun and chased the young man outside, where he shot him in the neck, arm and chest, according to a police report. The report does not indicate whether Glass, 19, took anything from the home. Lemes later told police he meant to detain Glass until authorities arrived, but he fired when Glass "lunged at him," the report says. Buoyed by their Christian faith, the Glasses already have forgiven Lemes, whom they've never met. But the grieving parents also believe that the slaying of their son was a terrible mistake triggered when he mistakenly entered Lemes' house and then turned to face the homeowner. ... Glass, a sophomore at Angelo State University who grew up on his family's farm, had been staying at his sister's house on Autumn Evening the night he died. That house is painted white with blue trim and is on the right side of the cul-de-sac. Lemes' house is also white with blue trim and is on the right side of another cul-de-sac, Autumn Star. One home is directly behind the other. I wonder if the boy just confused the houses. link
_____________________________
Many Bothans died to bring you this information.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:26:12 PM
|
|
|
1love1God1way
Posts: 1984
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn quote:
The not killing one. Context? The context is. . . do not kill. I see it pretty much as simple as that. quote:
Unless you see justification in Scripture for purposely killing someone who was taking mere material possessions from you. quote:
I do see it. So I have broke into your house in the middle of the night and I tell you "I am here to just take mere possesions, do not defend yourself". Would you rest easy and say, "ok, just lock up after you leave"? I guess I was specifically speaking of Scripture justification.
< Message edited by 1love1God1way -- 5/7/2008 8:47:22 PM >
_____________________________
-Ben-
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:33:04 PM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1428
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: henny Here's the story about the Raymond Lemes guy that the article referenced. quote:
Carmen and Burnell Glass, two God-fearing cotton farmers from the fields of West Texas, are looking to a higher law these days in grappling with the sudden, violent death of their son. For others, the slaying of Tracy Glass raises questions embedded firmly in the Texas Penal Code. The case, experts said, hinges on whether a Northwest Side homeowner thought deadly force was his only option to protect himself or recover property when he chased the unarmed college student to the street and shot him to death. Raymond Lemes, 48, found Glass inside his house early Saturday morning. Believing Glass was an intruder, Lemes grabbed his .40-caliber handgun and chased the young man outside, where he shot him in the neck, arm and chest, according to a police report. The report does not indicate whether Glass, 19, took anything from the home. Lemes later told police he meant to detain Glass until authorities arrived, but he fired when Glass "lunged at him," the report says. Buoyed by their Christian faith, the Glasses already have forgiven Lemes, whom they've never met. But the grieving parents also believe that the slaying of their son was a terrible mistake triggered when he mistakenly entered Lemes' house and then turned to face the homeowner. ... Glass, a sophomore at Angelo State University who grew up on his family's farm, had been staying at his sister's house on Autumn Evening the night he died. That house is painted white with blue trim and is on the right side of the cul-de-sac. Lemes' house is also white with blue trim and is on the right side of another cul-de-sac, Autumn Star. One home is directly behind the other. I wonder if the boy just confused the houses. link Oh dear. Looks like the story gets a little more complicated. Maybe it's time for Christians everywhere to reconsider the doctrine of "shoot first, ask questions later"- at least with regards to how they themselves operate. Sounds like this is the story of a college kid who got drunk and went to the wrong home.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:34:55 PM
|
|
|
HisFish
Posts: 457
Joined: 8/3/2005
From: Rocky mountain way
Status: online
|
quote:
Reading further in that article gives some very excellent reasons why this is a bad law ... quote:
“The danger of empowering people to use deadly force is that they are not trained to recognize friend or foe in highly dangerous situations,” he said. “Oftentimes, a stranger in a house turns out to be a drunken neighbor or a relative.” I disagree with this point in the article, because while it is true that police officers are trained to deal with situations such as this, the fact is that if you confront an intruder in your home, it is just you and him. The police are not there, but you are, and you have milliseconds at best to make a decision. I've thought about how i would react in the same situation, and i have determined that i will kill the intruder if i do not recognize him/her because i would have to assume that they are there to do my loved ones harm, time would not permit the luxury of an interview with the person to determine his intentions.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:39:34 PM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1428
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HisFish I disagree with this point in the article, because while it is true that police officers are trained to deal with situations such as this, the fact is that if you confront an intruder in your home, it is just you and him. The police are not there, but you are, and you have milliseconds at best to make a decision. I've thought about how i would react in the same situation, and i have determined that i will kill the intruder if i do not recognize him/her because i would have to assume that they are there to do my loved ones harm, time would not permit the luxury of an interview with the person to determine his intentions. I'd be ready to use a gun if I saw him as a threat to my life or the lives of others. Short of that, I wouldn't see the need to shoot someone.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:39:40 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
The context is. . . do not kill. I see it pretty much as simple as that. That is your choice to not kill but that is not what it means. Work out our own salvation.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:40:39 PM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1428
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn quote:
The context is. . . do not kill. I see it pretty much as simple as that. That is your choice to not kill but that is not what it means. Work out our own salvation. You sound like a Methodist.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:40:42 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
The bottom part of the post above was not meant to be included in the quote, those are my words. Doh! Just hit edit and you can change it
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:41:57 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
I'd be ready to use a gun if I saw him as a threat to my life or the lives of others. Short of that, I wouldn't see the need to shoot someone. Agree for the most part
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:44:15 PM
|
|
|
henny
Posts: 1282
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: MN
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HisFish I've thought about how i would react in the same situation, and i have determined that i will kill the intruder if i do not recognize him/her because i would have to assume that they are there to do my loved ones harm, time would not permit the luxury of an interview with the person to determine his intentions. But would you still shoot the intruder in the back if he is unarmed and running away from you?
_____________________________
Many Bothans died to bring you this information.
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 8:49:20 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 758
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
Looks like the story gets a little more complicated. Am sure it will
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 9:21:54 PM
|
|
|
stellaluna
Posts: 3324
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Please bear in mind that the number of people shot under these circumstances is miniscule compared to the number of Texans with guns.
_____________________________
CW Underground "Everything Stellaluna said (I do agree with her, honest)." -- miasma
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/7/2008 11:17:03 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 6717
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
It's kind of bizarre when you read all of them together, though, as you get the impression that Texas is some sort of Mad Max-esque post-apocalyptic wasteland where all its citizens are packing 24-7 and people are whipping out their guns and engaging in shootouts in the streets at all hours of the day. Actually, the impression I get is that Texas has a lot of really, really, stupid criminals.
_____________________________
Jack “I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth” William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
|
|
|
|
RE: 'Castle doctrine' likely will apply in fatal shooting - 5/8/2008 12:01:20 AM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1428
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud quote:
It's kind of bizarre when you read all of them together, though, as you get the impression that Texas is some sort of Mad Max-esque post-apocalyptic wasteland where all its citizens are packing 24-7 and people are whipping out their guns and engaging in shootouts in the streets at all hours of the day. Actually, the impression I get is that Texas has a lot of really, really, stupid criminals. Hey! It's Texas. </northeastern elitism>
|
|
|
|
| |