Search The Bible   
Featured Sponsors
Crosswalk Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Forums  | Register | Login

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List | 

RE: There He Goes Again

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> RE: There He Goes Again
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 4:17:32 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 126
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 4:18:42 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:



John, I will not force a young girl to give birth to her sister. Her father raped her - the baby was concieved out of violence.


For the sake of the truth I'll ask if you have any biblical support for this brutal treatment of an uborn child for the sins of his father...

quote:

Go ahead and call it whatever you want, contradictory -


I call what it is...


quote:

I am not the one getting the abortion, either. If I was raped, I'm pretty sure that I would not get an abortion either. I just cannot tell a young girl who was raped by her father that she must give birth to her sister. I just will not do it -again, call it want you want, I don't really care.


Support for murder is the same as murder...

John


Thank you very little...Have a nice day.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 127
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 4:35:56 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.



It's all about rationalizing so you can support those who without a doubt support the mass murder of children... Yet, if you really believe there is no real difference between the the two main parties in regards to abortion a vote for either is a vote for the mass murder of unborn children...

Of course there is the matter of the homosexual agenda, but I sure you have a escape clause for that as well...

John
Post #: 128
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 4:36:57 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:



John, I will not force a young girl to give birth to her sister. Her father raped her - the baby was concieved out of violence.


For the sake of the truth I'll ask if you have any biblical support for this brutal treatment of an uborn child for the sins of his father...

quote:

Go ahead and call it whatever you want, contradictory -


I call what it is...


quote:

I am not the one getting the abortion, either. If I was raped, I'm pretty sure that I would not get an abortion either. I just cannot tell a young girl who was raped by her father that she must give birth to her sister. I just will not do it -again, call it want you want, I don't really care.


Support for murder is the same as murder...

John


Thank you very little...Have a nice day.


Would you rather I lied to you and said it's OK to murder the child of a rape?

John
Post #: 129
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 7:20:01 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.



It's all about rationalizing so you can support those who without a doubt support the mass murder of children... Yet, if you really believe there is no real difference between the the two main parties in regards to abortion a vote for either is a vote for the mass murder of unborn children...

Of course there is the matter of the homosexual agenda, but I sure you have a escape clause for that as well...

John


John,

If McCain cannot promise to use an anti-abortion litmus test on SCJ nominees, how is he going to be able to help the cause of overturning RVW...

I'll be waiting with the popcorn...

Thank you in advance, Peace and God bless,
Post #: 130
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 7:21:25 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:



John, I will not force a young girl to give birth to her sister. Her father raped her - the baby was concieved out of violence.


For the sake of the truth I'll ask if you have any biblical support for this brutal treatment of an uborn child for the sins of his father...

quote:

Go ahead and call it whatever you want, contradictory -


I call what it is...


quote:

I am not the one getting the abortion, either. If I was raped, I'm pretty sure that I would not get an abortion either. I just cannot tell a young girl who was raped by her father that she must give birth to her sister. I just will not do it -again, call it want you want, I don't really care.


Support for murder is the same as murder...

John


Thank you very little...Have a nice day.


Would you rather I lied to you and said it's OK to murder the child of a rape?

John


It's a child of incest, John. And again, thank you very little...

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 131
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 7:56:38 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:



John, I will not force a young girl to give birth to her sister. Her father raped her - the baby was concieved out of violence.


For the sake of the truth I'll ask if you have any biblical support for this brutal treatment of an uborn child for the sins of his father...

quote:

Go ahead and call it whatever you want, contradictory -


I call what it is...


quote:

I am not the one getting the abortion, either. If I was raped, I'm pretty sure that I would not get an abortion either. I just cannot tell a young girl who was raped by her father that she must give birth to her sister. I just will not do it -again, call it want you want, I don't really care.


Support for murder is the same as murder...

John


Thank you very little...Have a nice day.


Would you rather I lied to you and said it's OK to murder the child of a rape?

John


It's a child of incest, John. And again, thank you very little...




Regardless there is nothing that child did to deserve death, and of course not every rape involves incest...

John
Post #: 132
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 7:57:47 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.



It's all about rationalizing so you can support those who without a doubt support the mass murder of children... Yet, if you really believe there is no real difference between the the two main parties in regards to abortion a vote for either is a vote for the mass murder of unborn children...

Of course there is the matter of the homosexual agenda, but I sure you have a escape clause for that as well...

John


John,

If McCain cannot promise to use an anti-abortion litmus test on SCJ nominees, how is he going to be able to help the cause of overturning RVW...

I'll be waiting with the popcorn...




What does McCain have to do with Christians supporting abortion and the gay agenda?

John
Post #: 133
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 8:04:05 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.



It's all about rationalizing so you can support those who without a doubt support the mass murder of children... Yet, if you really believe there is no real difference between the the two main parties in regards to abortion a vote for either is a vote for the mass murder of unborn children...

Of course there is the matter of the homosexual agenda, but I sure you have a escape clause for that as well...

John


John,

If McCain cannot promise to use an anti-abortion litmus test on SCJ nominees, how is he going to be able to help the cause of overturning RVW...

I'll be waiting with the popcorn...




What does McCain have to do with Christians supporting abortion and the gay agenda?

John


Nice try - aren't you saying that I should vote for McCain over Obama?

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 134
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 8:06:22 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:



John, I will not force a young girl to give birth to her sister. Her father raped her - the baby was concieved out of violence.


For the sake of the truth I'll ask if you have any biblical support for this brutal treatment of an uborn child for the sins of his father...

quote:

Go ahead and call it whatever you want, contradictory -


I call what it is...


quote:

I am not the one getting the abortion, either. If I was raped, I'm pretty sure that I would not get an abortion either. I just cannot tell a young girl who was raped by her father that she must give birth to her sister. I just will not do it -again, call it want you want, I don't really care.


Support for murder is the same as murder...

John


Thank you very little...Have a nice day.


Would you rather I lied to you and said it's OK to murder the child of a rape?

John


It's a child of incest, John. And again, thank you very little...




Regardless there is nothing that child did to deserve death, and of course not every rape involves incest...

John


Well, in the case of incest, I stand by my belief. Again, I said that if even if I was raped, I don't think (99.9% sure that I would not) I would get an abortion - of course I cannot say with 100% assurance, because, thank God, I have never been raped.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 135
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 8:18:46 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.



It's all about rationalizing so you can support those who without a doubt support the mass murder of children... Yet, if you really believe there is no real difference between the the two main parties in regards to abortion a vote for either is a vote for the mass murder of unborn children...

Of course there is the matter of the homosexual agenda, but I sure you have a escape clause for that as well...

John


John,

If McCain cannot promise to use an anti-abortion litmus test on SCJ nominees, how is he going to be able to help the cause of overturning RVW...

I'll be waiting with the popcorn...




What does McCain have to do with Christians supporting abortion and the gay agenda?

John


Nice try - aren't you saying that I should vote for McCain over Obama?



Please try and find a single post where I endorse John McCain.... good luck...

And while you are at it find biblical support for supporting abortion and the gay agenda...

John
Post #: 136
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 8:23:05 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, in the case of incest, I stand by my belief. Again, I said that if even if I was raped, I don't think (99.9% sure that I would not) I would get an abortion - of course I cannot say with 100% assurance, because, thank God, I have never been raped.


That's fine, but understand there is no biblical grounds to murder the child, even in cases of incest... And it's ironic you wouldn't call for the death of the rapist, when the bible does call for that...

John
Post #: 137
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 8:47:38 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:


ORIGINAL: Lizahana

And you are refusing to acknowledge the fact that McCain has not promised to use an anti-abortion litmus test for judicial nominees.


It doesn't really matter...


quote:

Coupled with the Republicans dismal history on appointing SCJ nominees, there is no difference between at a presidential level.



Ok... So a vote for either party is a vote for abortion, the mass murder of children...

Still have to deal with the biblical consequences aspects of this subject...


John


1. Of course it matters - that is what you're saying isn't it?! That you should support someone who will use an anti-abortion litmus test for SCJ nominees? If not, what are you talking about?

2. Exactly...I'm glad we agree on something.



It's all about rationalizing so you can support those who without a doubt support the mass murder of children... Yet, if you really believe there is no real difference between the the two main parties in regards to abortion a vote for either is a vote for the mass murder of unborn children...

Of course there is the matter of the homosexual agenda, but I sure you have a escape clause for that as well...

John


John,

If McCain cannot promise to use an anti-abortion litmus test on SCJ nominees, how is he going to be able to help the cause of overturning RVW...

I'll be waiting with the popcorn...




What does McCain have to do with Christians supporting abortion and the gay agenda?

John


Nice try - aren't you saying that I should vote for McCain over Obama?



Please try and find a single post where I endorse John McCain.... good luck...

And while you are at it find biblical support for supporting abortion and the gay agenda...

John


Well, then whom do you support?

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 138
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/7/2008 8:48:41 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, in the case of incest, I stand by my belief. Again, I said that if even if I was raped, I don't think (99.9% sure that I would not) I would get an abortion - of course I cannot say with 100% assurance, because, thank God, I have never been raped.


That's fine, but understand there is no biblical grounds to murder the child, even in cases of incest... And it's ironic you wouldn't call for the death of the rapist, when the bible does call for that...

John


Well, I can't do it - so I guess I'm not as perfect as you.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 139
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 12:59:39 AM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, then whom do you support?



Nobody you do...

John
Post #: 140
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 1:03:05 AM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, in the case of incest, I stand by my belief. Again, I said that if even if I was raped, I don't think (99.9% sure that I would not) I would get an abortion - of course I cannot say with 100% assurance, because, thank God, I have never been raped.


That's fine, but understand there is no biblical grounds to murder the child, even in cases of incest... And it's ironic you wouldn't call for the death of the rapist, when the bible does call for that...

John


Well, I can't do it - so I guess I'm not as perfect as you.



How can you support the murder of an unborn child and worry about quest workers having to return home after working in the United States... Doesn't make any sense whatsoever...

John
Post #: 141
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 9:44:51 AM   
rcjames


Posts: 5257
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana
It's a child of incest, John. And again, thank you very little...
Peace and God bless,


A soloist at my Church is the product of an incestous rape. She ministers greatly, is the mother of 4, and a pillar of the community as well as the Church.

The World would have suffered loss if she had been torn apart and flushed down the commode without a chance for life.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 142
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 10:06:21 AM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, then whom do you support?



Nobody you do...

John


I'll rephrase: whom are you going to vote for.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 143
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 10:07:30 AM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, in the case of incest, I stand by my belief. Again, I said that if even if I was raped, I don't think (99.9% sure that I would not) I would get an abortion - of course I cannot say with 100% assurance, because, thank God, I have never been raped.


That's fine, but understand there is no biblical grounds to murder the child, even in cases of incest... And it's ironic you wouldn't call for the death of the rapist, when the bible does call for that...

John


Well, I can't do it - so I guess I'm not as perfect as you.



How can you support the murder of an unborn child and worry about quest workers having to return home after working in the United States... Doesn't make any sense whatsoever...

John


I can't, John - I won't. You can bring it up as many times as you wish, and the answer will still be the same.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 144
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 10:11:14 AM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcjames

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana
It's a child of incest, John. And again, thank you very little...
Peace and God bless,


A soloist at my Church is the product of an incestous rape. She ministers greatly, is the mother of 4, and a pillar of the community as well as the Church.

The World would have suffered loss if she had been torn apart and flushed down the commode without a chance for life.

Thanks
RC


Hi RC,

Agreed - it would have been a loss.

Well, as I have said, if I was raped, I'm 99.9% sure I would not get an abortion - I can't say with 100% certainty, because, thank God, I've never been raped.

I just cannot force a young girl who has been raped by her father to have her baby, her sister. I have no idea what this would feel like. I'lll keep saying it if I have to.

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 145
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 2:16:34 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Well, then whom do you support?



Nobody you do...

John


I'll rephrase: whom are you going to vote for.




Haven't made up my mind, but rest asured it will not be who you will vote for...

John
Post #: 146
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 2:19:36 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

I can't, John - I won't. You can bring it up as many times as you wish, and the answer will still be the same.



I know... I just want it to be clear that you are selective in your regard for human suffering... And while most here don't care if one's own veiws step all over themselves, in reality it's an issue...

John
Post #: 147
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 2:21:33 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 4522
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

Hi RC,

Agreed - it would have been a loss.



The above is direct conflict with your view on the subject... Can't have both no regard and regard for the same thing...

John
Post #: 148
RE: There He Goes Again - 6/8/2008 2:48:50 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1074
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SovereignIsHe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

I can't, John - I won't. You can bring it up as many times as you wish, and the answer will still be the same.



I know... I just want it to be clear that you are selective in your regard for human suffering... And while most here don't care if one's own veiws step all over themselves, in reality it's an issue...

John


Whatever you say, John.

Peace and God bless,