|
|
|
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
legalism - 7/14/2008 8:51:57 AM
|
|
|
deliveredarling
Posts: 1877
Status: offline
|
I see in these threads all the time, comments made about this or that being legalistic. I really think it is a bunch of pooey. People scream legalism when they don't like something they are hearing. They scream it when they feel convicted. They especially scream it when they have to give up something that they are doing (a pet sin). It is amazing to me what and how people will justify sin in their lives. My suggestion to you leagalist police, is look in your life to what needs to go before telling someone that they are a legalist. Deflection doesn't help you or anyone else.
_____________________________
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light." Luke 8:16
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 8:58:32 AM
|
|
|
bluestone
Posts: 2934
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: United States of America
Status: offline
|
Not everyone is the way you have described. I grew up in a church where going to the circus was a sin. Dancing was a sin, going to the prom was a sin, owning a television was a sin, wearing a wedding ring was a sin, all jewelry was, in fact , sin. Wearing short sleeves was a sin. The church was, in fact, legalistic in a big way. they also removed people from membership on a regular basis who fell down in regards to any of the above mentioned situations. A pastor lost his preaching credentials when his adult married daughter was "seen" going into a movie theater. Following extra Biblical rules does not make anyone a better, more holy believer. having "Standards" that show an absolute lack of trust in the Holy Spirit's convicting power does not make your church higher than others. Legalism is a very real thing. It needs to stop.
_____________________________
I need Christ. Not something that resembles Christ.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 9:04:13 AM
|
|
|
deliveredarling
Posts: 1877
Status: offline
|
quote:
Following extra Biblical rules does not make anyone a better, more holy believer. I'm not referring to any extra biblical rules. i agree those do need to stop. I'm referring to the very clearly stated scriptures in the bible, that people want to twist to mean justification on their own sin. This is when they scream legalism. maybe I didn'[t describe my beef to well.
_____________________________
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light." Luke 8:16
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 9:17:01 AM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3974
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
I have seen both kinds of legalsim. Neither are pretty.
_____________________________
Avatar is Saphira 5 months and Louvena at 23 months! We are now grandparents TWICE!! ==================================== Our CD is now available here: http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 9:26:34 AM
|
|
|
deliveredarling
Posts: 1877
Status: offline
|
Living a holy life. You've seen the major ones. They have all been debated and beaten to a dead horse. Accountability/ responsibility I just don't get why following the Word of God equals legalism or equates to being a pharisee. It just doesn't make any sense.
_____________________________
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light." Luke 8:16
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 10:41:38 AM
|
|
|
armydude
Posts: 15934
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: NC
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: deliveredarling I see in these threads all the time, comments made about this or that being legalistic. I really think it is a bunch of pooey. People scream legalism when they don't like something they are hearing. They scream it when they feel convicted. They especially scream it when they have to give up something that they are doing (a pet sin). It is amazing to me what and how people will justify sin in their lives. My suggestion to you leagalist police, is look in your life to what needs to go before telling someone that they are a legalist. Deflection doesn't help you or anyone else. I see the legalism card played a lot when it's not true, but I've also seen a lot of people that are 100% accurate in their assessment. The kicker is this; if you tell me something's wrong, that's truth while if you tell me that I'm not saved because of it, that's likely legalism.
_____________________________
Nothing is certain but death and taxes? No. There is nothing certain but the Word of God.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 11:26:56 AM
|
|
|
Liveloved
Posts: 1597
Joined: 1/22/2008
Status: offline
|
Delivered, As one who has befriended a number of women who were in legalistic churches but who have now been set free, I understand what you are speaking of. Those who were trapped in it and are now FREE scream at anything that resembles what they were trapped in before. It is a natural reaction---they fear what they know to be evil. I have said this before but I would rather be found by God in a doctrineless church (which I was) than to be found by Him in a legalistic church. The legalistics have SO MUCH to get beyond to find God. And few do! Colossians 2 gives much understanding to what these rules (even so-called biblical ones) do. They are superficial and though making the outside look pretty good, they are not the 'substance' (Paul's word). And Paul ends the chapter by saying, "These are matters which have, to be sure, the appearance of wisdom in self-made religion and self-abasement and severe treatment of the body, but are of NO VALUE against fleshly indulgence." Paul isn't talking about extremes here like those who whip themselves. He's talking about the simple "do not handle, do not taste, do not touch"! Paul is warning us of the deceitfulness and danger of such. Those who are now free of such constraints are ultrasensitive to anything that smells of this. They will get over it in time---the Spirit does amazing and mighty works to set them free of this response as well. But it takes time. And we must bear with them, stand with them, pray for them, and love them through this very real time of what they perceive of danger. Anyway, I hope I've helped you in some way understand what you are observing. DD, you know how wonderful freedom is. You've experienced it. You also know what bondage is all about. Use what you know to come alongside and love these individuals to the place the Lord wants them to be. Bless you dear sister ! LL Edited to add: Also look at 2Cor 3. The letter of the Law kills and many of those you are referring to have experienced this kind of death. It is brutal. And once freed, the pendulum tends to swing to the other extreme. But where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. So if we love them, pray for them, teach them what is TRUE and walk along side them, they will find the liberty of the Spirit. It is His work but we can do our part.
< Message edited by Liveloved -- 7/14/2008 11:51:58 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 11:38:33 AM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3974
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: deliveredarling I just don't get why following the Word of God equals legalism or equates to being a pharisee. It just doesn't make any sense. Actually it does. Not necessarily right, but there is a sense to it. Modern evangelicism has made such an idol out of "salvation by faith ONLY" that anything that looks remotely like "works" is considered evil. "Legalism!" "Works salvation!" etc. etc. has been the cry both from the pulpit and the congregants. Look up the discussion on "Lordship Salvation" as taught by John McArthur on these lists to see how rabid that subject can be. It is as if people either don't want to grow up as christians or believe that initial salvation is all there is. Edited to add: Pastors need to teach their congregations what legalism REALLY is (and what it is NOT), and WHY it is bad.
_____________________________
Avatar is Saphira 5 months and Louvena at 23 months! We are now grandparents TWICE!! ==================================== Our CD is now available here: http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 11:58:38 AM
|
|
|
drmark
Posts: 3267
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: online
|
quote:
I have said this before but I would rather be found by God in a doctrineless church (which I was) than to be found by Him in a legalistic church. The legalistics have SO MUCH to get beyond to find God. And few do! This is an interesting observation but one that seems to belittle the efficacious grace of God. I really do see how growing up in a legalistic system makes one's appreciation of grace more difficult, but surely God is able to overcome human pride. Indeed, I wonder if those who are saved out of legalism may actually be more dependent on God's grace in the long run than those who are saved out of deep dark sinful behaviors and make so many personal lifestyle changes after conversion. One more comment for consideration. Legalism can readily become the extreme end result of Holiness doctrine when too much emphasis is placed on free will as its basis. On the other hand, antinomianism (lawlessness) can readily become the extreme end result of Reformed Calvinism when too much emphasis is placed on unconditional election. For me personally, I would much rather err on the side of legalism than lawlessness given the undisputed final destination of the constant sinner!
_____________________________
Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 12:15:55 PM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6386
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: drmark ...For me personally, I would much rather err on the side of legalism than lawlessness given the undisputed final destination of the constant sinner! I don't think that or the other extreme shows the biblical understanding of the place of works in the believer's life. Having come from the camp that tended to err on the side of legalism, it was marvelous grace to learn that works are either a natural result of one's new nature and an immersion into walking in the Holy Spirit or else they are empty and worthless attempts to be something one is not. Works are either genuine expressions of that which God is doing internally or else they are wood, hay, and straw.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 12:17:54 PM
|
|
|
deliveredarling
Posts: 1877
Status: offline
|
quote:
Works are either genuine expressions of that which God is doing internally or else they are wood, hay, and straw. I agree with this completely. Forced works are evident or will eventually be revealed. God's works will stand eternal.
_____________________________
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light." Luke 8:16
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 12:49:37 PM
|
|
|
bluestone
Posts: 2934
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: United States of America
Status: offline
|
I think most of the bickering resides in "disputable issues", things scripture may not seem to be clear on. Things you have to strectch scripture to get it to wrap around all the way. Too many times people have been taught in error by the ignorant that something is sin that is not, or something is not sinful that is..legalism and liberalism are both beds I try not to sleep in. Say that 150 years ago a local congregation was taught that something was evil and sinful. That subject kept being taught, and asumed to be correct all these years. You can point out to the descendants in that church (or denomination) that they are wrong, back it up with scripture...and they won't change their minds. Tradition takes preference.
_____________________________
I need Christ. Not something that resembles Christ.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:02:47 PM
|
|
|
drmark
Posts: 3267
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: online
|
quote:
I don't think that or the other extreme shows the biblical understanding of the place of works in the believer's life. Having come from the camp that tended to err on the side of legalism, it was marvelous grace to learn that works are either a natural result of one's new nature and an immersion into walking in the Holy Spirit or else they are empty and worthless attempts to be something one is not. I also agree. But now that you're in the camp that "tends to err" on the side of lawlessness, do you not despair for those that ignore or minimize their works?
_____________________________
Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:12:51 PM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3974
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
quote:
the camp that "tends to err" on the side of lawlessness Drmark: that was a bit harsh.
_____________________________
Avatar is Saphira 5 months and Louvena at 23 months! We are now grandparents TWICE!! ==================================== Our CD is now available here: http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:35:28 PM
|
|
|
deliveredarling
Posts: 1877
Status: offline
|
DrMark, and DaveW, you boys have lost me. Camps that err on the side of lawlessness?????? Ignoring or minimizing works??? Why would somebody deny God the glory of those works???
_____________________________
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light." Luke 8:16
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:35:30 PM
|
|
|
bluestone
Posts: 2934
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: United States of America
Status: offline
|
Another point about legalism: it produces religious snobbery. You and your church are not as holy as me and mine since your members are "allowed" to do x, y, and z. Chrisitans destroy each other of disputable matters.
_____________________________
I need Christ. Not something that resembles Christ.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:40:26 PM
|
|
|
deliveredarling
Posts: 1877
Status: offline
|
quote:
religious snobbery. Haven't heard that term before, it made me chuckle. I get what you are saying. What it boils down to is respect. We don't have to agree on everything, but we don't have to be right on everything either. I can tell you my opinions and disagree with yours, but that doesn't mean we aren't both believers in God. I don't have to put you or anyone else down because we may disagree.
_____________________________
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light." Luke 8:16
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:46:28 PM
|
|
|
Liveloved
Posts: 1597
Joined: 1/22/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
This is an interesting observation but one that seems to belittle the efficacious grace of God. Not on my part, drmark. As I just got up from my piano singing "and by grace we'll stand on your promises and by faith we'll walk as you walk with us", I have no intention of belittling my most gracious God. But many of those still caught within the legalistic mindset that thinks every sermon has to be a salvation message or you can't baptize babies, etc, think God is too small to find us WHEREVER we are. So my testimony, growing up in the Evangelical & Reformed church begun by my ancestors when they immigrated to this country from Switzerland and which became the UCC church, of God speaking to me as a child, calling to me from within this most liberal church, using His word and hymns such as Holy, Holy, Holy, is a MOST wonderful testimony of God's amazing ways. He can reach beyond the barriers that bind men and find us! Hallelujah! No church is too liberal, no teaching too heinous for God. He can and does reach beyond all these so-called barriers that men erect. He finds those who are His. Not one sheep will He lose. No, His grace is marvelous. And because of His grace and the leading of His Spirit, I can walk at liberty. But I don't have to battle the restraints that those who were bound by legalism battle. I walk in freedom. But freedom that is bound to Jesus. True freedom. That is the freedom He longs to bring us into. He's doing it for me. Praise the name of Jesus!
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 1:55:29 PM
|
|
|
drmark
Posts: 3267
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: online
|
quote:
Drmark: that was a bit harsh. I'm not the one who used the phrase initially as you can see in post #11. My comment in post #10 was that legalism or antinomianism "can readily become extreme end results" of certain doctrinal traditions, not that one camp "tends to err" on certain sides. Do you feel labelling Holiness doctrine as "the camp that tended to err on the side of legalism" is any less harsh than labeling Reformed doctrine as "the camp that 'tends to err' on the side of lawlessness"? Is legalism any more grievous a problem than antinomianism in your opinion, Dave?
_____________________________
Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 2:03:22 PM
|
|
|
drmark
Posts: 3267
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: online
|
quote:
Another point about legalism: it produces religious snobbery. You and your church are not as holy as me and mine since your members are "allowed" to do x, y, and z. And some might argue that lawlessness produces religious snobbery: Your and your church are not as liberated as me and mine since your members "prohibited" to do x, y, and z.
_____________________________
Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 2:18:23 PM
|
|
|
bluestone
Posts: 2934
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: United States of America
Status: offline
|
drmark: I agree . The swing to liberalism has equal results.
_____________________________
I need Christ. Not something that resembles Christ.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 2:32:50 PM
|
|
|
drmark
Posts: 3267
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: online
|
Thanks for the acknowledgement, bluestone, but I'm not so sure that legalism and lawlessness do indeed have equal results. Think about it. If a Christian is doing all kinds of unnecessary good works for personal "holiness", then God may rebuke her/him in Heaven for their legalism. On the other hand, if a Christian is living in daily sin assured of their "election", will they even see God in Heaven to be rebuked?
_____________________________
Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 2:54:19 PM
|
|
|
bluestone
Posts: 2934
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: United States of America
Status: offline
|
I don't agree with the mentality of "I was sinking deep in sin, WHEEEE!!!" or with the adage "Tis a glorious church, without spot or wrinkle". I do think that if you are not sure whether to do something or not, and don't get a clear answer from prayer or scripture, you are best to stay away from it. At the same time, avoiding something that is not sin because someone else demands it of you robs you of freedom in Christ. Example: I feel free to go swimming, even though there are people I know who declare it to be sin. I do not, after prayer, feel free to swim in a skimpy swimsuit, for me it would be sin. (conviction).
_____________________________
I need Christ. Not something that resembles Christ.
|
|
|
|
RE: legalism - 7/14/2008 2:55:27 PM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6386
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: drmark Thanks for the acknowledgement, bluestone, but I'm not so sure that legalism and lawlessness do indeed have equal results. Think about it. If a Christian is doing all kinds of unnecessary good works for personal "holiness", then God may rebuke her/him in Heaven for their legalism. On the other hand, if a Christian is living in daily sin assured of their "election", will they even see God in Heaven to be rebuked? This reminds me of a story about two sons, one stayed home the other wanted his inheritance early and went away to a far country to spend it. I think, of the two, the one that stayed home ended up the poorer of the two. Then there was Mary and Martha... One learning at the Master's feet, the other busy and critical of the other's lack of work. I remember the Master rebuking just one of the two. [Edited to correct typo]
< Message edited by JimboFletch -- 7/14/2008 3:19:40 PM >
|
|
|
|
| |