|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Christian?
View related threads:
(in this forum
| in all forums)
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
|
[Poll]
|
Would you marry a couple where only one was a Christian?
|
| Yes: I am a pastor |
|
| No: I am a pastor |
|
| Yes, pastors should do this: I'm not a pastor. |
|
| No, pastors should not marry such a couple: I'm not a pastor. |
|
Total Votes : 54
|
(last vote on : 11/1/2009 1:03:08 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 2:46:42 PM
|
|
|
Lapidoth
Posts: 5731
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
|
With any topic, we either accept what the Word actually says, or we follow the book of "yeah, I know, but"............ But 6:66 (or) was it But 66:6 I think Bro_Shane spelled it out quite clearly.
_____________________________
Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it? http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 4:03:03 PM
|
|
|
buckifn
Posts: 1738
Joined: 5/23/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
In which case we must also apply it to business arrangements, friendships, neighbours etc. In fact if we take it to its natural conclusion Christians should be completely isolated from non-Christians in every sphere of life, therefore unable to reach the lost with the good news! Apart from marriage, does that attitude reflect how Jesus went about His business whilst here on earth, me thinks not!! See this is where I believe we err so much! Yes, that must apply to all those things you mentioned, AND MORE. Truth is it must apply to ALL ASPECTS of our lives. Every choice, relationship, etc....but the error is in thinking that keeps us FROM being a light for Jesus...the truth is that is WHAT MAKES US A LIGHT SHINING IN DARKNESS. If the world can't see a difference that's because there is none. I have never in my 50 yrs. felt isolated.
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 4:35:02 PM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bro_Shane quote:
ORIGINAL: TheTartanTammy Good response, I agree. However, as we know Christians do marry non-Christians, Christians do divorce, Christians don't always obey every aspect of God's will for their lives, Christians have been given free will...do any of these facts put them beyond God's grace? Thanks. I'm not sure what you mean about them being beyond God's grace. The truthfulness of the command does not change because of either the inability of some to keep it or the choice of those not to. quote:
My simple approach to this matter, knowing the sad fact of sin in my own life, is to extend grace, trying not to judge, but after appropriate counselling from God's word to allow a Christian to take responsibility for his/her life. It is one thing to show a brother or sister, in love, how their attitude/behavior does not fall in line with scripture. It is quite another to take an active role in helping them both break a biblical command and give the illusion that what they do is OK with God. It would also make little sense if we told them what they were doing (or going to do) did not please God, but went along with them after telling them so. And whether or not we have sin in our own life does not change the biblical mandate or our responsibility to it. What it should so is help up to understand that we suffer the same human frailties as everyone else. We should also be an example of how God'd strength helps us, in spite of those frailties, stand strong on the word. quote:
I would rather after all is said and done, that a Christian be married under God's word than go off to a secular non-Christian wedding celebrant, and in doing so possibly also go away from the Lord, and the Lord's people. But knowingly marrying an unbeliever is neither being married under or by God's word. To conduct such a ceremony is to aid in a sham. All the scripture in the world can be recited and it changes nothing - unless the unbeliever repents and is saved at their own wedding (which, BTW, would be awesome). quote:
I appreciate that in your culture that this may not be acceptable, however the subject matter here is a secondary issue, as is baptism and so many others!! How many Christian women for example do not wear a hat to church, despite God's word saying they should? How many born again believers have not been baptised, despite the Lord's command? But this has nothing to do with culture as did either wearing a head covering or women wearing wigs. There's nothing in the text that would show, lead, or hint that this specific instruction was to a certain group but the broader principle applies to all. And whether or not a person consents to Baptism or not has no bearing on the biblical command. It is a slippery and dangerous slope we face if we can stop living by biblical commands based on whether or not other people keep other unrelated biblical commands. Humans could ignore and rebel against every single thing in the Bible (which they do) and it still would not change the truthfulness and authority of the command. quote:
Sorry, if you first read bro-Shane's post and then my response to it you will see that I agree with his interpretation of the passage. However, I then go on to expand on the reality of how some Christians live today in relation to this and other matters which are equally biblical. Hope this gives you the answer you seek. And herein lies the problem. There is no equally biblical command in this area. We are told not to be yoked with unbelievers, period. The only exception given is when a person becomes a believer when a spouse does not. The reality of some Christians does not change anything. What you are saying is that God and the applicability of His word should change based on how we (the same fallen creation He came to save and redeem) decide to live our lives. If this is the case, then there is no absolute morality. If there is no absolute morality there is no God and we are all wasting our time. This is the only logical outcome, there is no other. Thank you for your gracious and comprehensive response. What I am trying to point out in reality is the danger of pointing the finger, when there are 3 pointing back at us! You are right in what you say, however my concern in all of this is a lack of grace. A lack of grace by those dogmatically ready to condemn others without the ability to live out all of God's commands in their own lives. How many women ignore, for example, the command to wear a head covering, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that in line with God's revealed will? How many men have long hair in churches, which again biblically is wrong, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that? The point that I am trying to make (albeit in a laboured fashion) is that we are all capable of not obeying God's word, yet what does Jesus say about the danger of judging? I have seen too many pastors condemning others from the pulpit for a variety of reasons, yet being completely blind to their own faults, how many more Christians fall into the same category? It is sadly easier in the Christian life to look to see how others are walking with the Lord, without checking our own walk. No, we shouldn't collude with others to break God's commands, but neither are we as sinners saved by grace in a position to condemn them either!! If we do, then we may be guilty of a bigger sin, pushing them away from the Lord and His church. I believe firmly that pastors have a duty to explain God's word, all Christians have a responsibility to what they do with what has been explained to them. If after careful explanation of God's word, someone decides to go the opposite way to God's revealed will, then the responsibility lies with the individual, not with the pastor. Jesus said feed my sheep, He didn't say that we are to force feed them.
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 4:49:49 PM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: buckifn quote:
In which case we must also apply it to business arrangements, friendships, neighbours etc. In fact if we take it to its natural conclusion Christians should be completely isolated from non-Christians in every sphere of life, therefore unable to reach the lost with the good news! Apart from marriage, does that attitude reflect how Jesus went about His business whilst here on earth, me thinks not!! Yes, that must apply to all those things you mentioned, AND MORE. So, in reality if we really want to follow through on this we must examine what influence for example the media has on us like TV, cinema etc. Because if I hear you right, then an awful lot of Christians, me included, are not taking this command seriously enough when we consider the influence that the world in all of its various ways has on the average Christian?! When we stop to think about it, it really does go way beyond marriage, when we consider how yoked we are to multimedia, advertising, non-Christian friendships, associations with work mates, neighbours, unbelieving family members...etc
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 4:54:20 PM
|
|
|
Bro_Shane
Posts: 1614
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheTartanTammy Thank you for your gracious and comprehensive response. What I am trying to point out in reality is the danger of pointing the finger, when there are 3 pointing back at us! I agree that simply pointing the finger misses the point entirely. There's no need for us to be accusatory when the Word and the Spirit is quite capable of conviction. quote:
You are right in what you say, however my concern in all of this is a lack of grace. A lack of grace by those dogmatically ready to condemn others without the ability to live out all of God's commands in their own lives. That is my concern as well. Knowing our own weaknesses should help us have the right heart and attitude when we speak to others. We should treat one another as fellow pilgrims who suffer the same trials and tribulations, looking to the perfect Father that has given us His perfect word. I remind you today, you will remind me tomorrow, but the standard never changes. It's called intercession and edification, and it's a never ending process. quote:
How many women ignore, for example, the command to wear a head covering, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that in line with God's revealed will? How many men have long hair in churches, which again biblically is wrong, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that? These were cultural considerations having to do with prostitution and pagan worship. The general principle applies to all, even though the specific command was for specific people. quote:
The point that I am trying to make (albeit in a laboured fashion) is that we are all capable of not obeying God's word, yet what does Jesus say about the danger of judging? Jesus says that with whatever standard we judge we will be judged by. He doesn't say not to judge, only be careful how you do it. And, again, whether or how much we sin does not change the truthfulness or authority of the command. quote:
I have seen too many pastors condemning others from the pulpit for a variety of reasons, yet being completely blind to their own faults, how many more Christians fall into the same category? Sad, but true. Yet the hypocrisy of one does not change the nature of the message given. It only points to the nature of the giver. quote:
It is sadly easier in the Christian life to look to see how others are walking with the Lord, without checking our own walk True. quote:
No, we shouldn't collude with others to break God's commands, but neither are we as sinners saved by grace in a position to condemn them either!! If we do, then we may be guilty of a bigger sin, pushing them away from the Lord and His church. I'm not saying we condemn them, just their actions with scripture (not our own ideas of feelings) as the standard. If done in the right heart and spirit, there is no sin there. quote:
I believe firmly that pastors have a duty to explain God's word, all Christians have a responsibility to what they do with what has been explained to them. If after careful explanation of God's word, someone decides to go the opposite way to God's revealed will, then the responsibility lies with the individual, not with the pastor. Jesus said feed my sheep, He didn't say that we are to force feed them True, but we are also commanded to keep ourselves pure and not to be partakers in the sins of others.
_____________________________
<---- Respect the turtle neck
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 4:59:00 PM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
bro_Shane, it is a real pleasure to debate with you, unilke other encounters I have had on these boards. The gracious way that you have dealt with me has now given me food for thought! God bless you.
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 5:40:42 PM
|
|
|
buckifn
Posts: 1738
Joined: 5/23/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
So, in reality if we really want to follow through on this we must examine what influence for example the media has on us like TV, cinema etc. Because if I hear you right, then an awful lot of Christians, me included, are not taking this command seriously enough when we consider the influence that the world in all of its various ways has on the average Christian?! When we stop to think about it, it really does go way beyond marriage, when we consider how yoked we are to multimedia, advertising, non-Christian friendships, associations with work mates, neighbours, unbelieving family members...etc ABSOLUTELY. I only wish I had been taught this many years ago. We truly are imbedded in this world and it's fashions far more than we realize. I say that not in condemnation, because I would be condemning myself first, but in acknowledgement that this is part of the battle we must wage daily...spirit against flesh. It's one of many things that keeps me repenting. I don't think it is about judging others. I'm not sure why it comes across that way so easily in the forums sometimes.
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/10/2009 7:05:55 PM
|
|
|
TMeeks
Posts: 1532
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheTartanTammy Thank you for your gracious and comprehensive response. What I am trying to point out in reality is the danger of pointing the finger, when there are 3 pointing back at us! You are right in what you say, however my concern in all of this is a lack of grace. A lack of grace by those dogmatically ready to condemn others without the ability to live out all of God's commands in their own lives. How many women ignore, for example, the command to wear a head covering, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that in line with God's revealed will? How many men have long hair in churches, which again biblically is wrong, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that? The point that I am trying to make (albeit in a laboured fashion) is that we are all capable of not obeying God's word, yet what does Jesus say about the danger of judging? I have seen too many pastors condemning others from the pulpit for a variety of reasons, yet being completely blind to their own faults, how many more Christians fall into the same category? It is sadly easier in the Christian life to look to see how others are walking with the Lord, without checking our own walk. No, we shouldn't collude with others to break God's commands, but neither are we as sinners saved by grace in a position to condemn them either!! If we do, then we may be guilty of a bigger sin, pushing them away from the Lord and His church. I believe firmly that pastors have a duty to explain God's word, all Christians have a responsibility to what they do with what has been explained to them. If after careful explanation of God's word, someone decides to go the opposite way to God's revealed will, then the responsibility lies with the individual, not with the pastor. Jesus said feed my sheep, He didn't say that we are to force feed them. You get a hearty AMEN from me on the observation that we are woefully selective in following the clear words of the Scriptures in far too many areas. One, for instance, at least in this country, is the provision in the Old Testament that a person cannot be put to death for murder unless there were actual witnesses. Most Christians support the death penalty on the fact that God provided for the death penalty in Scripture. But, they fail to take the next step, ALSO in the Scriptures, to ensure that a person is not put to death wrongly. You and I have both seen this in the lives of pastors and missionaries and it never Glorifies God to be so selective in what we will or will not believe. But, it is even LESS Glorifying to God to interact gracelessly to others with whom we must deal. Especially as church leaders.
_____________________________
http://focusonliberty.blogspot.com Is "Left" vs. "Right" really accurate?- Check out the Liberty Dial!
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 1:42:04 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TMeeks quote:
ORIGINAL: TheTartanTammy Thank you for your gracious and comprehensive response. What I am trying to point out in reality is the danger of pointing the finger, when there are 3 pointing back at us! You are right in what you say, however my concern in all of this is a lack of grace. A lack of grace by those dogmatically ready to condemn others without the ability to live out all of God's commands in their own lives. How many women ignore, for example, the command to wear a head covering, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that in line with God's revealed will? How many men have long hair in churches, which again biblically is wrong, yet happily condemn others for not doing this or that? The point that I am trying to make (albeit in a laboured fashion) is that we are all capable of not obeying God's word, yet what does Jesus say about the danger of judging? I have seen too many pastors condemning others from the pulpit for a variety of reasons, yet being completely blind to their own faults, how many more Christians fall into the same category? It is sadly easier in the Christian life to look to see how others are walking with the Lord, without checking our own walk. No, we shouldn't collude with others to break God's commands, but neither are we as sinners saved by grace in a position to condemn them either!! If we do, then we may be guilty of a bigger sin, pushing them away from the Lord and His church. I believe firmly that pastors have a duty to explain God's word, all Christians have a responsibility to what they do with what has been explained to them. If after careful explanation of God's word, someone decides to go the opposite way to God's revealed will, then the responsibility lies with the individual, not with the pastor. Jesus said feed my sheep, He didn't say that we are to force feed them. You get a hearty AMEN from me on the observation that we are woefully selective in following the clear words of the Scriptures in far too many areas. One, for instance, at least in this country, is the provision in the Old Testament that a person cannot be put to death for murder unless there were actual witnesses. Most Christians support the death penalty on the fact that God provided for the death penalty in Scripture. But, they fail to take the next step, ALSO in the Scriptures, to ensure that a person is not put to death wrongly. You and I have both seen this in the lives of pastors and missionaries and it never Glorifies God to be so selective in what we will or will not believe. But, it is even LESS Glorifying to God to interact gracelessly to others with whom we must deal. Especially as church leaders. Your response in much appreciated, I feel less isolated now! God bless
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 1:49:53 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: buckifn quote:
So, in reality if we really want to follow through on this we must examine what influence for example the media has on us like TV, cinema etc. Because if I hear you right, then an awful lot of Christians, me included, are not taking this command seriously enough when we consider the influence that the world in all of its various ways has on the average Christian?! When we stop to think about it, it really does go way beyond marriage, when we consider how yoked we are to multimedia, advertising, non-Christian friendships, associations with work mates, neighbours, unbelieving family members...etc ABSOLUTELY. I only wish I had been taught this many years ago. We truly are imbedded in this world and it's fashions far more than we realize. I say that not in condemnation, because I would be condemning myself first, but in acknowledgement that this is part of the battle we must wage daily...spirit against flesh. It's one of many things that keeps me repenting. I don't think it is about judging others. I'm not sure why it comes across that way so easily in the forums sometimes. So, maybe the survey that began this debate should be expanded to include all areas of the Christian life, if Paul has more than marriage in mind with what he says in 2 Cor 6: 14? After all, why only narrow it to marriage if Paul meant so much more, why not let it inform every area of our Christian living? 2 Corinthians 6:14 (New International Version) Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? It is interesting that the word 'unbelievers' (plural) is used, that alone would suggest more than marriage is involved, how many Christians take more than one wife or husband at one time?
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 2:01:26 AM
|
|
|
agapeflight
Posts: 120
Joined: 3/29/2009
Status: offline
|
This one will upset someone but here goes. If it is possible for people to go to a justice of the peace and get married then why is marriage considered so sacrosanct? Are those not real marriages if not performed by a minister or priest? Paul said we ought not to be unequally yoked, that covers all contracts including employment (as so many of us learned the hard way.) But does anything in the Bible give power over marriage specifically to the volition of an overseeing clergymember? I d0o not know of any, Paul simply said 'the marriage bed is honarable among all.' and 'I wish you would remain as I am, since those who marry will have trouble in the flesh.' That marriage is God's will for the family is upheld in Scripture, but that marriage itself, alike with burial, and baby dedications ought to be under the sole power of some type of priestly(pastoral) class does not seem to exist beyond church tradition. Now I personally would not conduct a ceremony for two people unless they were both well grounded and mature in my own prayerful opinion, I want them to have the best chance at making past the 50% divorce rate that they can. I would counsel the believer strongly to consider very carefully the Biblical warnings and if they wanted to go through with it I would have to pass it to someone else. Sadly I think some pastors peform these types of things as public relations not as sacrament. to augment the point notice how Paul told the Corinthians that he was glad he had not baptized anyone in Corinth. It sounds like Paul did not take the sacraments as seriously as we might like to believe. So therefore as with so many things, I think there is probably a strong amount of liberty given to us all by grace in the matter of marriage. A final aside, I know a local church where a pastor some years ago had a wave of marriages out of the singles group, like seven of them in a couple years. A few years later that same pastor moved on to a job at the district and was shortly thereafter busted for soliciting prostitution. Within years all of those couples save one were divorced. It seems like his handiwork did not pass the fire test, so I caution my brothers to lay hands on no mand quickly, do not be participants in another man's sin. God bless.
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 5:12:50 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: agapeflight This one will upset someone but here goes. If it is possible for people to go to a justice of the peace and get married then why is marriage considered so sacrosanct? Are those not real marriages if not performed by a minister or priest? Paul said we ought not to be unequally yoked, that covers all contracts including employment (as so many of us learned the hard way.) But does anything in the Bible give power over marriage specifically to the volition of an overseeing clergymember? I d0o not know of any, Paul simply said 'the marriage bed is honarable among all.' and 'I wish you would remain as I am, since those who marry will have trouble in the flesh.' That marriage is God's will for the family is upheld in Scripture, but that marriage itself, alike with burial, and baby dedications ought to be under the sole power of some type of priestly(pastoral) class does not seem to exist beyond church tradition. Now I personally would not conduct a ceremony for two people unless they were both well grounded and mature in my own prayerful opinion, I want them to have the best chance at making past the 50% divorce rate that they can. I would counsel the believer strongly to consider very carefully the Biblical warnings and if they wanted to go through with it I would have to pass it to someone else. Sadly I think some pastors peform these types of things as public relations not as sacrament. to augment the point notice how Paul told the Corinthians that he was glad he had not baptized anyone in Corinth. It sounds like Paul did not take the sacraments as seriously as we might like to believe. So therefore as with so many things, I think there is probably a strong amount of liberty given to us all by grace in the matter of marriage. A final aside, I know a local church where a pastor some years ago had a wave of marriages out of the singles group, like seven of them in a couple years. A few years later that same pastor moved on to a job at the district and was shortly thereafter busted for soliciting prostitution. Within years all of those couples save one were divorced. It seems like his handiwork did not pass the fire test, so I caution my brothers to lay hands on no mand quickly, do not be participants in another man's sin. God bless. Your post leaves me a little confused! Are you saying that marriage is only for Christians?
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 7:06:16 AM
|
|
|
zoebob
Posts: 7966
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: land of limbo
Status: online
|
The poll is only about marriage because that's what I want to know about. I want to know if pastors are willing to help others in their sins. That's the big point here. It doesn't matter if you don't obey God's law X I'm only concerned about God's law Y. Just because someone doesn't keep law X doesn't mean they shouldn't keep Y. Also, most other sins that are being mentioned here (and some of them are things that most people would say are not specific for today in the way they are interpreted) are not things that a pastor helps people do. A pastor doesn't go out and take a woman's hats or cut her hair. As for unequally yoked with unbelieverS there are many ways to do that. Some involve only one unbeliever, others include more but all in all there is generally more than 1 opportunity to be linked with an unbeliever. That would be like saying when scripture says "Don't exasperate your children" that if you only have 1 child it's ok to exasperate them. ETA: Or when the Bible says to "love your wives" it's not that the men should have more than one wife but that they are talking to a group that should love their wives as a group.
_____________________________
L-R: DD1, Ellies DS2, DD2, Ellies DS1 L-R: Ellies DD1, Ellies DD2, DS, Ellies DS3
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 9:53:19 AM
|
|
|
ta_mosquito
Posts: 10998
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
|
quote:
This one will upset someone but here goes. If it is possible for people to go to a justice of the peace and get married then why is marriage considered so sacrosanct? Are those not real marriages if not performed by a minister or priest? Those marriages done in front of a JP are just as valid. However, will a minister willingly and freely unite a nonbeliever to a believer? That's the question at hand.
_____________________________
LibriVox: acoustical liberation of books in the public domain (Avatar: Turkeys are all saying "Moo")
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/11/2009 11:01:27 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: zoebob The poll is only about marriage because that's what I want to know about. I want to know if pastors are willing to help others in their sins. That's the big point here. It doesn't matter if you don't obey God's law X I'm only concerned about God's law Y. Just because someone doesn't keep law X doesn't mean they shouldn't keep Y. Also, most other sins that are being mentioned here (and some of them are things that most people would say are not specific for today in the way they are interpreted) are not things that a pastor helps people do. A pastor doesn't go out and take a woman's hats or cut her hair. As for unequally yoked with unbelieverS there are many ways to do that. Some involve only one unbeliever, others include more but all in all there is generally more than 1 opportunity to be linked with an unbeliever. That would be like saying when scripture says "Don't exasperate your children" that if you only have 1 child it's ok to exasperate them. ETA: Or when the Bible says to "love your wives" it's not that the men should have more than one wife but that they are talking to a group that should love their wives as a group. The words 'selective' and 'cherry picking' come to mind, so with that I will bow out of this one, having said that I have valued my debate with bro_shane, that really was worth being involved with. Thanks
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/22/2009 3:57:44 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
I have come back to this one to say that with the help of Bro_shane and his very helpful discussion style and non-legalistic approach, that my thoughts are now turning regarding this topic.
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/29/2009 12:15:20 PM
|
|
|
mariadreamer
Posts: 179
Joined: 5/17/2005
From: va
Status: offline
|
It wouldn't be done in our church. Couples usually spend several months in pre-marriage counseling with the priest where all things pertaining to faith would be discussed. Perhaps the hope is for the non- Christian to come to Christ - and this has happened many times in our parish.
_____________________________
Christ is risen from the dead, by death He has trampled down death, and on those in the tombs bestowing life!
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/30/2009 2:19:01 PM
|
|
|
Lapidoth
Posts: 5731
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ta_mosquito quote:
This one will upset someone but here goes. If it is possible for people to go to a justice of the peace and get married then why is marriage considered so sacrosanct? Are those not real marriages if not performed by a minister or priest? Those marriages done in front of a JP are just as valid. However, will a minister willingly and freely unite a nonbeliever to a believer? That's the question at hand. My wife and I were married by a JP, and then her mother insisted we be married by a minister. So we were married twice in the same day........... Which we've always joked we would have to be divorced twice if that were to happen. June 3, 1968 and still married and still fighting (I mean, loving). So I guess we are covered. To reiterate the OP, Would I marry a believer to a non-believer. Nope............no excuse for doing it and no excuse for not doing it. I plain and simply will not marry a couple in that case.
_____________________________
Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it? http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/30/2009 7:50:11 PM
|
|
|
zoebob
Posts: 7966
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: land of limbo
Status: online
|
THe poll doesn't add up to100%
_____________________________
L-R: DD1, Ellies DS2, DD2, Ellies DS1 L-R: Ellies DD1, Ellies DD2, DS, Ellies DS3
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/31/2009 2:29:31 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: zoebob THe poll doesn't add up to100% After thoughtful discussion with, and balanced gracious input from Bro_shane, my thinking has now turned around on a topic that I had not really previously thought through properly. A couple of things I want to say regarding this are; 1. Legalistic and dogmatic arguements from others did not influence me at all. 2. These forums when handled properly with the right appraoch can have a positive impact on some of us. 3. You can now count me as a no in the poll (I am a pastor). Thank you.
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/31/2009 10:12:40 AM
|
|
|
Lapidoth
Posts: 5731
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: zoebob THe poll doesn't add up to100% 98% I never paid any attention to that part of the numbers before. LOL I had to go back and look.
_____________________________
Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it? http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 7/31/2009 12:51:34 PM
|
|
|
zoebob
Posts: 7966
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: land of limbo
Status: online
|
When I posted that it added up to 90%. If you work it out to the hundredths place it is about right
_____________________________
L-R: DD1, Ellies DS2, DD2, Ellies DS1 L-R: Ellies DD1, Ellies DD2, DS, Ellies DS3
|
|
|
|
RE: Would you marry a couple where only one was a Chris... - 8/31/2009 11:19:44 AM
|
|
|
TheTartanTammy
Posts: 812
Joined: 12/2/2008
From: North Britain!!!!
Status: offline
|
Just to let you know that I have updated my thinking on this. I would not marry a Christian to a non-Christian under any circumstances. I would however happily marry two non Christians of different genders.
_____________________________
TheTartanTammy Isa 40: 11
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|