|
|
|
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/3/2009 3:28:12 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
The purpose of the OP isn't to focus on Ten Boom herself, but on the conditions under which a Christian might resist government authorities. Romans 13:1-4 says: Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority ? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil. Corrie Ten Boom, long considered a Christian hero, obviously didn't submit to the authority of the de facto Nazi government that ruled the Netherlands after the invasion. She obviously resisted the laws which directed citizens to submit to the apprehension and confinement of Jews in the Netherlands; not only that, but she and her family developed elaborate plans and systems to evade enforcement of the law, as well as acting dishonestly by surreptitiously hiding her activities. So, was she and others like her disobedient to Scripture, and if so, should she be seen not as a hero of the faith, but another rebel against it?
< Message edited by Jhud -- 8/3/2009 3:34:39 PM >
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/3/2009 5:50:06 PM
|
|
|
ManimalX
Posts: 2558
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
|
Awesome. Way to take the ball and run with it, Jack That was exactly where I was going in the other thread with my line of questioning. Of course she wasn't a sinner for resisting the Nazis. The passage of Scripture calls for Christians to give "taxes, customs, honor, and fear" to whom it is due, which obviously also means that we can withhold those things from those to whom they are NOT due. Governments can forfeit their rights, and we don't have to be spineless doormats to tyranny and other evil. To sit by and do nothing while ANYONE does evil isn't some great virtue, it is a great shame.
< Message edited by ManimalX -- 8/3/2009 6:01:00 PM >
_____________________________
"And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth." - 2nd Timothy 2:24,25
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/3/2009 7:38:24 PM
|
|
|
navyblueret
Posts: 1971
Joined: 11/29/2008
From: S/W Nebraska
Status: offline
|
ManimalX says well. I see God's word, as he says. We will soon know, if I am seeing rightly. In Messiah. Arley
_____________________________
In the name of 'THE' Mashiach, Man the wall, set the watch, sound the Shofar. Our redemption draws nigh. Messiah, my Captain, and Helmsman. (Joh 14:6 KJV) ... I am the way, the truth, and the life: ...
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 12:03:41 PM
|
|
|
agapist
Posts: 659
Joined: 6/13/2009
Status: offline
|
Apples and oranges once again jhud and manimal. I am sorry but it just astonishes me. Love is the point, that is the law we follow, and that is what she did. Love has no hierarchy of endearment. Love is for all, equal and impartial. Corrie was simply being a Christian following the law, love is the fulfillment of the law. Were the American Revolutionaries being loving towards the British? Corrie was acting, as we need all do, as a citizen of heaven, where love is the governing authority. Our worldly rights, psychological needs, prosperity, and desires are not and should never be an issue. This has been my point all along. Love is the law we follow. Haven't you seen where I was going? Corrie is a support for what I have been trying to drive home. If the authorities came for her, what do you think she would do? Shot them? No, she would go peacefully, she would submit to their authority. This is the "foolishness of God" I have been trying to emphasize. Utterly foolish for her to act that way but completely godly. How godly is it to gut a fellow Christian with a bayonet because he is wearing red? What she did was selfless, she was other-centered in her actions. Were the American rebels being selfless? That you can equate this woman's actions with armed rebellion is a marvelous feat of mental engineering. If you are actually saying that it was right and proper for Corrie to do what she did as a matter of conscience, then refusing military service as a matter of conscience is also right and proper.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 12:20:50 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
Corrie was simply being a Christian following the law, love is the fulfillment of the law. Were the American Revolutionaries being loving towards the British? Corrie was acting, as we need all do, as a citizen of heaven, where love is the governing authority. Our worldly rights, psychological needs, prosperity, and desires are not and should never be an issue. You are getting a tad confused here; the governing authorities in Ten Booms case were Nazi's; obviously she was refusing to submit to them out of love for Jews, not the Nazi's. Americans were presumably fighting and dying out of love for their fellow Americans and families. But interestingly, you do acknowledge here (whether you realize it or not) that there is a legitimate basis for not submitting to authorities. quote:
This has been my point all along. Love is the law we follow. Haven't you seen where I was going? Corrie is a support for what I have been trying to drive home. If the authorities came for her, what do you think she would do? Shot them? No, she would go peacefully, she would submit to their authority. This is the "foolishness of God" I have been trying to emphasize. Utterly foolish for her to act that way but completely godly. Well I will agree she was no soldier, but the fact is she didn't submit to the governing authorities; if you want to claim that Christians should all be pacifists, that would be a different argument - but of course that would mean a Christian could never serve as an agent of government in a capacity that punishes evil, which is what God established government for. quote:
How godly is it to gut a fellow Christian with a bayonet because he is wearing red? What she did was selfless, she was other-centered in her actions. Were the American rebels being selfless? A soldier can be the most selfless person in the world; after all the greatest love is to lay down one's life for one's friends; soldiers do this as a matter of practice (as do police officers and others who put themselves in harms way for others). While I admire greatly Ten Boom and what she did in resisting the Nazi's, the fact is if soldiers hadn't fought the Nazi's, Ten Boom's efforts would have been in vain. quote:
That you can equate this woman's actions with armed rebellion is a marvelous feat of mental engineering. If you are actually saying that it was right and proper for Corrie to do what she did as a matter of conscience, then refusing military service as a matter of conscience is also right and proper. I have always considered the option to be a pacifist to be a matter of a believer's conscience; but to indict the actions of others who have served and died protecting your right to make such pronouncements is atrocious, and not in the least bit 'loving'.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 9:28:04 PM
|
|
|
manhattan42
Posts: 225
Joined: 4/13/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud The purpose of the OP isn't to focus on Ten Boom herself, but on the conditions under which a Christian might resist government authorities. Romans 13:1-4 says: Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority ? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil. Corrie Ten Boom, long considered a Christian hero, obviously didn't submit to the authority of the de facto Nazi government that ruled the Netherlands after the invasion. She obviously resisted the laws which directed citizens to submit to the apprehension and confinement of Jews in the Netherlands; not only that, but she and her family developed elaborate plans and systems to evade enforcement of the law, as well as acting dishonestly by surreptitiously hiding her activities. So, was she and others like her disobedient to Scripture, and if so, should she be seen not as a hero of the faith, but another rebel against it? Wow! What a way to pen a nonsensical straw man argument, compare it to another argument with which nothing is shared in common, then come to a completely flawed conclusion! Bravo! ---------------------- The power of Conservative Codswollop is really astounding! __________________ First, there is NOTHING in common with Nazi Germany and Christian English Colonial America. If there, is you need to point it out. Second, Corrie Ten Boom, served her God by preventing violence to her brothers and sisters, not by fomenting violence against her brothers and sisters as did the 'patriots' of the American Revolution. ----------------- Now I know what Jesus meant when He said there will come a day when some will call good evil and evil good. Jhud showed me the way this day!
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 9:45:58 PM
|
|
|
agapist
Posts: 659
Joined: 6/13/2009
Status: offline
|
Jhud, please listen to another voice, that of manhattan42, telling you how specious your arguments are. They do not make sense. you draw on anything and everything to make a point and we are trying to stay focused on Scripture. The nonsensical question you asked me and keep asking thinking I am avoiding it: when did Britain get established by God? What? Then later saying they broke from rome and so were not a governing authority. What? Shadows cast from a hundred light sources; you come from no sure direction.
|
|
|
|
Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 9:48:07 PM
|
|
|
PinkCarnations
Posts: 10801
Status: offline
|
Corrie tenBoom was a wonderful woman of God. If what she did was wrong, then what Daniel did was wrong as well. The law of the land and the law of God often but heads. That is why we, as Christians, fight so hard to protect the unborn, sanctity of marriage, etc. God's law is more important than man's.
_____________________________
Thank you Veterans.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 11:32:28 PM
|
|
|
NotreDame
Posts: 566
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PinkCarnations Corrie tenBoom was a wonderful woman of God. If what she did was wrong, then what Daniel did was wrong as well. The law of the land and the law of God often but heads. That is why we, as Christians, fight so hard to protect the unborn, sanctity of marriage, etc. God's law is more important than man's. Are her and Daniel sufficiently parallel to permit such a comparison, and thereby reach a conclusion about one on the basis of the other?
_____________________________
I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 11:39:54 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
Jhud, please listen to another voice, that of manhattan42, telling you how specious your arguments are. They do not make sense. you draw on anything and everything to make a point and we are trying to stay focused on Scripture. The nonsensical question you asked me and keep asking thinking I am avoiding it: when did Britain get established by God? What? Then later saying they broke from rome and so were not a governing authority. What? Shadows cast from a hundred light sources; you come from no sure direction. Um, manhattan is a left-wing radical with little regard for Scripture; remind me again why you think he is a voice of reason?
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/4/2009 11:47:16 PM
|
|
|
madelin1970
Posts: 71
Joined: 6/27/2009
Status: offline
|
What the Nazi's were doing was wrong. They were slaughtering innocent people because they wanted to do away with the Jews. It's called murder at the hands of an evil dictator. Corrie Ten Boom and others like her were brave to do what they did, they saved the lives of many innocent people.
_____________________________
That at the name of Jesus, every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 12:14:28 AM
|
|
|
SamsonUSA
Posts: 2067
Joined: 10/5/2008
From: Laguna Beach. Presently an Arizona desert dweller
Status: offline
|
quote:
Corrie Ten Boom, long considered a Christian hero, obviously didn't submit to the authority of the de facto Nazi government that ruled the Netherlands after the invasion How obedient were Moses and the children of Israel in their submission to the authority of Pharaoh during the Exodus?
_____________________________
If you can't be thankful for what you receive, be thankful for what you escape. "You are never more free than when you fulfill the plan God has for your life." Warren Wiersbe
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 12:35:59 AM
|
|
|
LCannon
Posts: 1119
Joined: 2/22/2007
From: Lebanon, OR
Status: offline
|
Miss Ten Boom violating Romans 13:1-4 is claiming Mother Teresa an atheist. Ludicrous. Of course I don't know either lady's heart but based on their obedience, witness and scarifice to Jesus Christ I fully expect to meet them in Glory. Just plunking a fact that Miss Ten Boom had no control over and criticizing it as a character flaw seems quite disingenuous.
_____________________________
'I will never leave you nor forsake you.' (Joshua 1:5) ''Let the very worst thing come to pass[and]even there, especially there; His hand will hold.' -Elisabeth Elliot-
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 1:06:00 AM
|
|
|
ManimalX
Posts: 2558
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SamsonUSA quote:
Corrie Ten Boom, long considered a Christian hero, obviously didn't submit to the authority of the de facto Nazi government that ruled the Netherlands after the invasion How obedient were Moses and the children of Israel in their submission to the authority of Pharaoh during the Exodus? Another excellent point, Samson. The answer from our opposition, no doubt, will be something along the lines of the New Testament not being written yet, that Romans 13 didn't apply to Israel, or some other such argument to time, that God changed His mind and decided it was OK to rebel against government before Romans 13, but not after. This is, as my 6-yr-old likes to say, "bringing the weak sauce". If government is established by God and meant to be unquestionably obeyed and always bowed down to, as our esteemed opponents argue, then government was ALWAYS established by God to be obeyed and bowed to. This argument is flawed, however, because if true it means that God was commanding Moses and the Hebrews to sin by demanding emancipation from Egypt and encouraging their rebellion against their rightful authority.
_____________________________
"And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth." - 2nd Timothy 2:24,25
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 9:58:12 AM
|
|
|
NotreDame
Posts: 566
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SamsonUSA quote:
Corrie Ten Boom, long considered a Christian hero, obviously didn't submit to the authority of the de facto Nazi government that ruled the Netherlands after the invasion How obedient were Moses and the children of Israel in their submission to the authority of Pharaoh during the Exodus? This example does not make sense because it is non-parallel. Why would the Israelites submit to an authority which had granted them freedom from its authority? The Egyptians rescinded all authority and control over the Jews, granted them their freedom to leave Egypt, and to leave the governmental jurisdiction and control of the pharoahs and Egyptian regime. It makes little sense to think the Jews who left Egypt should have remained in submission in this context. You are comparing apples to oranges.
_____________________________
I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 10:21:53 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
This example does not make sense because it is non-parallel. Why would the Israelites submit to an authority which had granted them freedom from its authority? The Egyptians rescinded all authority and control over the Jews, granted them their freedom to leave Egypt, and to leave the governmental jurisdiction and control of the pharoahs and Egyptian regime. It makes little sense to think the Jews who left Egypt should have remained in submission in this context. You are comparing apples to oranges. So that little incident when Pharoah was chasing down the Israelites and trapping them by the sea was them relinquishing their rights as authorities?
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 11:31:05 AM
|
|
|
John_O
Posts: 7800
Joined: 9/5/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud quote:
This example does not make sense because it is non-parallel. Why would the Israelites submit to an authority which had granted them freedom from its authority? The Egyptians rescinded all authority and control over the Jews, granted them their freedom to leave Egypt, and to leave the governmental jurisdiction and control of the pharoahs and Egyptian regime. It makes little sense to think the Jews who left Egypt should have remained in submission in this context. You are comparing apples to oranges. So that little incident when Pharoah was chasing down the Israelites and trapping them by the sea was them relinquishing their rights as authorities? Actually it was a foreign power trying to conquer an independent people. Prior to this Pharoah DID give the Israelites their freedom. Once the authority is relinquished it cannot be reimposed without the consent of the governed.
_____________________________
Psalms 46:10 Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 11:44:36 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
Actually it was a foreign power trying to conquer an independent people. Prior to this Pharoah DID give the Israelites their freedom. Once the authority is relinquished it cannot be reimposed without the consent of the governed. So where are the rules listed that determine when a 'foreign power' is legitimate? I mean the Israelites were free before the Egyptians imposed their rule on them the first time - did the Egyptians then become a legitimate authority? And how many chances do they get to do this? One? And what does that say about the legitimacy of the German rule over the Netherlands in the case of Ten Boom?
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 4:26:58 PM
|
|
|
Psalms274
Posts: 2865
Status: offline
|
In Kings 18 we read about Obadiah, who "feared the Lord greatly" and then the text tells us the evidence for that observation was that he had hidden a hundred prophets from the Queen so that they would be safe. quote:
Now it happened after many days that the word of the LORD came to Elijah in the third year, saying, "Go, show yourself to Ahab, and will send rain on the face of the earth." So Elijah went to show himself to Ahab. Now the famine was severe in Samaria. Ahab called Obadiah who was over the household (Now Obadiah feared the LORD greatly; for when Jezebel destroyed the prophets of the LORD, Obadiah took a hundred prophets and hid them by fifties in a cave, and provided them with bread and water.) Apparently Obadiah was not the only one hiding the those who were zealous for God from the King and Queen for in Kings 19 we read that God had "reserved seven thousand in Israel—all whose knees have not bowed down to Baal and all whose mouths have not kissed him." Had he been caught, he would have suffered great consequences for going against the government via jail or more likely, death; yet God was using Him for His purposes in Orbadiah's obedience to God in this matter. Corrie ten Boom did what the Lord was directing her to do. In Acts 5:27-32 we read about how the Apostles preached the Gospel despite being told by their authorities to stop teaching in His name. The Sanhedrin had the governing authority to jail and even put to death by stoning those who did not obey their commands. quote:
Having brought the apostles, they made them appear before the Sanhedrin to be questioned by the high priest. "We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name," he said. "Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man's blood." Peter and the other apostles replied: "We must obey God rather than men! The God of our fathers raised Jesus from the dead—whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might give repentance and forgiveness of sins to Israel. We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him." So it seems that when looking at the whole counsel of the word of God, when we read in Romans that we must submit to our governing authority, there are times when looking at what that authority is telling us to do, we may come in direct conflict with what God's word tells us to do. (A modern day example here in the US is the case of protecting the unborn.) In those cases when the government is doing something that is in direct violation to God's word, we are to stand firm on what God tells us first. BUT when doing so knowing full well we may be put in jail or in the case of Corrie ten Boom, or at times be put to death under the authority of the government. The word of God is very clear, we are to obey our governing authorities. But there are times when those directives are in direct violation to God's word, and in those times we have a choice to stand firm and follow God's word on the matter knowing full well that we ourselves may be punished for that action; or to remain silent. I am grateful that we have examples like Corrie and her family who were willing to pay the price to do the right thing.
_____________________________
I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the saints, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ. http://piswa.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 4:52:47 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
So it seems that when looking at the whole counsel of the word of God, when we read in Romans that we must submit to our governing authority, there are times when looking at what that authority is telling us to do, we may come in direct conflict with what God's word tells us to do. (A modern day example here in the US is the case of protecting the unborn.) In those cases when the government is doing something that is in direct violation to God's word, we are to stand firm on what God tells us first. BUT when doing so knowing full well we may be put in jail or in the case of Corrie ten Boom, or at times be put to death under the authority of the government. The word of God is very clear, we are to obey our governing authorities. But there are times when those directives are in direct violation to God's word, and in those times we have a choice to stand firm and follow God's word on the matter knowing full well that we ourselves may be punished for that action; or to remain silent. I am grateful that we have examples like Corrie and her family who were willing to pay the price to do the right thing. Excellent and well articulated guide to a proper understanding of when a Christian should resist authority.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 8:17:59 PM
|
|
|
agapist
Posts: 659
Joined: 6/13/2009
Status: offline
|
By George, I think I've got it. Is this what some of you believe? That the democratic way of life is the way God would have us govern and the founders who fought and died for this form of government thus died for a righteous cause, a neeed change God wanted for his people, and that as America is the founder and home of this way of life, and its defender, it is considered God's New Jerusalem. Am I close? I do not share these sentiments but if this is how some of you see, I understand why such strong feelings were evoked in these posts.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 9:13:13 PM
|
|
|
agapist
Posts: 659
Joined: 6/13/2009
Status: offline
|
For me, there is no way to equate selfless nonviolent behavior for the love of God and neighbor (in spirit) with violent self-interest for the sake of freedom and country (worldly). Oil and water: the will of God and the will of the people. The wisdom and values that have been expressed by Jhud and manimal are fine and shared by most decent people--but they are not applicable to a discussion focused on spirit. As Christians, we are not of this world--and that is the ground for what I am saying. We are citizens of heaven (actually and for real). Primary to Christ's whole message is that we are to live on earth as if in heaven--with love, joy, peace, and unity as our actual way of life. To the world , this is utter foolishness. Romans commonly mocked the Christians with this: "Look how they love one another." They sneered when they said it. If only the world sneered at Christians today for the same cause. Worldly values and conventional wisdom simply have no place in a discussion of spirit. Honoring those as relevant creates an impasse. Reason and logic will never get us to a place of understanding. Love alone has the eys to see reality in its full dimensions, with the depth perception of the eternal. And there's the rub. Another problem I see is how some view the nature of love. This what I see: Love is of God: that is the source of love. As God is love and love is of God it can never fail. Love is the most severe discipline that can be followed, for love begins with this: "Take no thought for your life." Love is other-centered, the self no longer resides in our own flesh. Love does not care one wit about making our life on earth any easier, better, or safer. Life is not precious to love, only heaven is precious. Love has no country or other earthly loyalties; obligations, yes, within the law, but no loyalties. There are three types of love: 1) unconditional; 2) unconditional; 3) unconditional--and this finds various forms of expression, such as agape. Love has no hierarchy of endearment, and this underscores the point about no earthly loyalties. Love, as mentioned, is ruthless, caring only for the ultimate well being of our soul--its eternal, not its worldly, life; anything else is a carnal distraction. This separates us from the world, it divides us against the world, as Christ said it would. But this not a stance we take or a worldview we hold; it is the world's reaction to our utter foolishness which creates this one-sided opposition. It is both absurd and troubling to them that what they hold dear holds no value for us. This is incidentally threatening to them. It is like heaping burning coals on their heads. Love appears to mock and undermine their treasured ideals and innermost desires, and this is not appreciated. The persecuted are blessed not because of what they suffer but for the joy they have where the worldly sees good cause for complaint, abttle, and revenge. Delight in the lord does away completely with any expectation or need for justice on this planet. Mercy is the most a Christian knows about justice. Go the extra mile...merrily skipping. When they bang on your door and shout, "The British are coming, the British are coming," and you respond, "I'll make a fresh pot of tea," they are not amused, but God is. For such action they will despise you, as they did Christ. Count it joy. I pray we all live truly foolish lives.
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 9:42:47 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 4481
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
When they bang on your door and shout, "The British are coming, the British are coming," and you respond, "I'll make a fresh pot of tea," they are not amused, but God is. For such action they will despise you, as they did Christ. Count it joy. I pray we all live truly foolish lives. Yes, and as you sip tea as your Jewish neighbors are hauled away, God weeps.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 10:56:48 PM
|
|
|
ManimalX
Posts: 2558
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NotreDame quote:
ORIGINAL: SamsonUSA quote:
Corrie Ten Boom, long considered a Christian hero, obviously didn't submit to the authority of the de facto Nazi government that ruled the Netherlands after the invasion How obedient were Moses and the children of Israel in their submission to the authority of Pharaoh during the Exodus? This example does not make sense because it is non-parallel. Why would the Israelites submit to an authority which had granted them freedom from its authority? The Egyptians rescinded all authority and control over the Jews, granted them their freedom to leave Egypt, and to leave the governmental jurisdiction and control of the pharoahs and Egyptian regime. It makes little sense to think the Jews who left Egypt should have remained in submission in this context. You are comparing apples to oranges. Your argument MIGHT be valid for the Hebrews as a PEOPLE, but surely Moses was a dirty old sinner in violation of the "don't resist your government" rule! His God-fueled one-man revolution was truly the pinnacle of guerrilla warfare the likes of which American Patriots could only dream of. I mean, he began by poisoning his enemy's water supply, moved on to devastating their food supplies, and that was nothing compared to his use of biological warfare and eventual massacre of tens of thousands of Egyptian firstborn in the dark of midnight. His revolutionary activities finally broke the will of the government, and then his compatriots robbed the Egyptian citizens blind! Sounds a little more drastic than muskets and cannon balls! You know.... you are right. Comparing Moses to Corrie ten-Boom or the American Patriots IS comparing apples to oranges: Moses and the Hebrews were WAY more of a thorn in the side of their government!
_____________________________
"And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth." - 2nd Timothy 2:24,25
|
|
|
|
RE: Did Corrie Ten Boom violate Romans 13:1-4? - 8/5/2009 11:27:23 PM
|
|
|
ManimalX
Posts: 2558
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: agapist For me, there is no way to equate selfless nonviolent behavior for the love of God and neighbor (in spirit) with violent self-interest for the sake of freedom and country (worldly). Oil and water: the will of God and the will of the people. The wisdom and values that have been expressed by Jhud and manimal are fine and shared by most decent people--but they are not applicable to a discussion focused on spirit. (bolding mine) This is what I have been trying to get you to admit, my friend. This is YOUR conviction, but Scripture does not make it ALL OF OURS. It is understandable but incorrect that you completely separate the spirit realm and what you call the worldly but what I would call the physical. I wrote that it is an understandable error because it is the error of dualism that crept into the church long ago, when misguided but well-meaning Christians asserted that any "good" Christian should only pursue occupations such as priesthood. This is the origin of the phrase, "too heavenly minded to be of any Earthly good". You may see that as a compliment, but I assure you it is not. The Bible knows nothing about abandoning the affairs of the world completely. Even our eternal habitation will be the New Earth! quote:
As Christians, we are not of this world--and that is the ground for what I am saying. We are citizens of heaven (actually and for real). Primary to Christ's whole message is that we are to live on earth as if in heaven Again, our eternal destination is not "heaven", but a redeemed Earth in a redeemed universe. The ethereal "heaven" that most non-believers would paint for you when asked is not a permanent "place" for humans. We have always been made for the Earth, and the Earth has always been made for us. Our eternity is here, not floating about the clouds someplace. To say that we need to live as we would "in heaven" is only revealing a glimpse of the whole picture. The Kingdom of Heaven has already begun!. We are establishing the beachhead right now as ambassadors for that Kingdom, bringing light and preservation (salt) wherever we can. We are merely awaiting the arrival of the King! quote:
Worldly values and conventional wisdom simply have no place in a discussion of spirit. Again, the erroneous erection of a border fence between "spirit" and "physical". quote:
Reason and logic will never get us to a place of understanding. Love alone has the eys to see reality in its full dimensions, with the depth perception of the eternal. And there's the rub. The only "rub" is an artificial one you have created. If reason and logic are worthless, why did God command us to love Him with all of our minds? quote:
Another problem I see is how some view the nature of love. This what I see: Love is of God: that is the source of love. As God is love and love is of God it can never fail. Love is the most severe discipline that can be followed, for love begins with this: "Take no thought for your life." Love is other-centered, the self no longer resides in our own flesh. Love does not care one wit about making our life on earth any easier, better, or safer. Life is not precious to love, only heaven is precious. Love has no country or other earthly loyalties; obligations, yes, within the law, but no loyalties. There are three types of love: 1) unconditional; 2) unconditional; 3) unconditional--and this finds various forms of expression, such as agape. Love has no hierarchy of endearment, and this underscores the point about no earthly loyalties. Love, as mentioned, is ruthless, caring only for the ultimate well being of our soul--its eternal, not its worldly, life; anything else is a carnal distraction. You have some beautiful notions of love, and most of what I quoted is correct. However, the question I want you to answer is this: if God is love and love is God and we are to be love like God, what happens when God uses physical and spiritual violence? Pretty much destroys any notion of "love" having a meaning of complete pacifism, doesn't it? quote:
When they bang on your door and shout, "The British are coming, the British are coming," and you respond, "I'll make a fresh pot of tea," they are not amused, but God is. For such action they will despise you, as they did Christ. Count it joy. I pray we all live truly foolish lives. So what happened to your beautiful prose about love laying down its life for a friend? The British were coming to kill friends and neighbors, but Bostonians should have sat idly by making tea?
_____________________________
"And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth." - 2nd Timothy 2:24,25
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|