Is there a biblical question you hope to have answered one day?

PeterC,
re: "Before the trouble started, Peter had been openly and happily sitting down at the table with Gentile Christians, eating whatever was served. By doing this, Peter was “living like a Gentile,” meaning he had dropped the strict Jewish customs that forbade Jews from eating with non-Jews or consuming non-kosher food. Peter knew this was perfectly okay because God had already given him the famous vision of the sheet in Acts 10, explicitly telling him, "And the voice came to him again a second time, 'What God has made clean, do not call common.” Acts 10:15.

It appears that you are offering Galatians 2:14 as a proof text for the dietary rules having been rescinded. Were Paul and James living like the Gentiles at that point? If not, why not?

That’s a fair question, but it misunderstands how Paul uses “living like a Gentile” (ethnikōs zēis) in Galatians 2:14.

The point in Galatians 2 isn’t about whether Paul, James, or Peter were permanently discarding their Jewish heritage, but whether they were treating non-Kosher table fellowship as permissible under the Gospel, and then hypocritically walking it back out of fear.

In terms of table fellowship and freedom, yes; in terms of identity, no. Freedom to share meals. Paul made it clear that in Christ, dietary laws no longer governed righteousness or fellowship (1 Corinthians 8:8, Romans 14:14). When Paul was with Gentiles, he ate with Gentiles without imposing Jewish ceremonial laws on them. He sums up his personal approach in 1 Corinthians 9:20–21:

“To the Jews I became as a Jew, to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law.”

Paul was not bound by the ceremonial law, but he was free to observe Jewish customs when ministering to Jews, as long as those customs weren’t treated as a requirement for salvation or fellowship. What made Peter’s action wrong in Galatians 2 was not that Peter was a Jew, but that Peter changed his behavior out of fear of the “circumcision party,” effectively signaling to Gentile believers that they were second-class Christians unless they Judaized.

Was James “living like the Gentiles”? Most likely no, but James was not forcing Gentiles to live like Jews either. James was the leader of the church in Jerusalem, a community composed almost entirely of Jewish believers. Naturally, James and the Jerusalem church continued to observe many Jewish traditions, Torah customs, and dietary habits as part of their cultural context.

The Jerusalem Council Agreement: However, James himself explicitly agreed that Gentiles did not need to come under the Mosaic Law or keep kosher laws to be saved or full members of God’s people Acts 15:19–20.

James living a Torah-observant personal life in Jerusalem was not hypocrisy. What Paul confronted in Galatians was people coming from James’ circle who were pressuring Gentiles in Antioch to adopt Jewish ceremonial practices, forcing a split at the communion table.

Mark 7:19: Jesus declared all foods clean: “Thus he declared all foods clean.” Acts 10:15: God explicitly told Peter, “What God has made clean, do not call common.” Romans 14:14: Paul writes, “I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself.”

Galatians 2 shows what happens when that theology meets real-life practice. Peter knew the food and the Gentile fellowship were clean (hence why he ate with them initially). Paul’s rebuke wasn’t, “You must stop being Jewish,” but rather, “If you, being a Jew, live like a Gentile (by freely eating with them) when it suits you, how can you turn around and force Gentiles to live like Jews just to eat at the same table with you?”
Peter

1 Like

Is Christ’s love transactional?

The short answer is no, Christ’s love is not transactional. It is relational, covenantal, and sacrificial. A transaction is based on a quid pro quo: “I give you X, so you owe me Y.” It is a contract where value is exchanged between two equal parties for mutual benefit. Christ’s love, however, works on a completely different paradigm.

In a transaction, you earn what you receive. But Scripture explicitly contrasts wages with God’s love:

“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 6:23

If God’s love were transactional, grace wouldn’t be grace. It would be a salary. We had nothing of value to offer Him in exchange for His love or salvation.

In business or transactions, no one invests in a completely bankrupt entity with no return on investment. Yet.

“But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” Romans 5:8

Christ didn’t wait for us to clean ourselves up or bring something to the bargaining table. He loved us at our absolute lowest and most hostile state. People often mistake Christian obedience for a transaction. “If I follow the rules, God has to love/bless me.” But in Scripture, obedience is a loving response to already being loved, not a payment to secure it:

“We love because he first loved us.” 1 John 4:19

Transactional thinking says: “I obey, therefore I am accepted.” The Gospel says: “I am accepted in Christ, therefore I gladly obey.”

A contract (transaction) is an exchange of goods/services protected by conditions: “If you fail your end, the deal is off.” A covenant is an unconditional pledge of self: “I give myself to you.” Christ’s blood sealed a new covenant, where His faithfulness covers our unfaithfulness (2 Timothy 2:13).
Peter

Regarding transactions, perhaps the question should be ;

Were His acts of sacrifice, transactional?

Did God owe Himself anything? I think not . I view His actions as more instructional, than sacrificial.

His actions, were actions of love, for us to emulate.

Christ’s actions ARE instructional and meant to be emulated. Absolutely. Scripture explicitly states that Jesus’ sacrifice sets an example for how believers should love one another.

“Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.” Philippians 2:5–8

“This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” 1 John 3:16

God was under no external obligation or compulsion to save humanity. Salvation was an act of pure, unforced divine grace.

While the cross is certainly instructional, classic Christian orthodoxy, I would argue that viewing the cross only as an example reduces the Gospel to moralism and strips the Atonement of its actual power. If Christ’s death was purely an example to follow, it leaves humanity with a tragic dilemma. It gives us a perfect model to emulate, but no power to fix our broken, sinful nature. Scripture clearly frames Christ’s sacrifice as doing real, objective, penal/substitutionary work. Not just revealing a lesson.

If a man stands on the edge of a pier and jumps into raging waters to drown just to show a woman on the shore how much he loves her, that isn’t love; it’s a meaningless gesture. But if the woman is already drowning in those raging waters, and the man dives in, rescues her, and dies in the process, his death is both a real rescue AND a supreme act of love to be emulated.

Christ didn’t jump onto the cross merely to show us an inspiring example; He jumped in because we were drowning in sin and death, paying the cost to pull us out. His sacrifice is instructional because it was first an objective rescue.

Does this clear it up a bit?
Peter

1 Like

Having read a physicians description of the Crucifixion many years ago, the unforgettable horror of His death made clear to me the power of His sacrifice.

The Crucifixion remains an endless source of instruction.

1 Like

That’s a very interesting question! I never even thought to ask that! I did read Matthew 17 verse 3 and all it says is “and behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them talking with him.” From a human standpoint my guess would be if Jesus and Moses and Elijah were talking maybe Peter heard the conversation and names were said because in verse 4 of Matthew 17 it says that Peter Jesus about making three Tabernacles one to Jesus one for Moses and one for Elijah so Peter obviously knew. Maybe you can check a commentary such like Matthew Henry’s commentary on the Bible and read what he says about that scripture, if he says anything at all but I think he would. Please share what you find out. Thanks!

2 Likes

“Moses and Elias appeared to the disciples; they saw them, and heard them talk, and, either by their discourse or by information from Christ, they knew them to be Moses and Elias; glorified saints shall know one another in heaven.”
This is what I got from Matthew Henry’s commentary. The thought I have is the disciples knew who they were simply by being in the Kingdom during the Transfiguration of Jesus.

1 Like

I saw this in action. One day, Jesus walked into my room, and even before He spoke to me, I knew who it was. Then He did speak (audibly) to me and said a certain Brother in Christ needs help and pray for Him, My jaw almost hit the floor because I recognized His voice as one I knew. How is this possible? I’ve never been taken up to heaven or even seen Jesus as far as memory serves me.

So how did I know who it was? I knew it before He spoke even. All I can say for sure is, when Jesus walks into the room, no introductions are necessary! Everyone knows who it is.

Is that because of the glory of God being with Him? Which speaks to every cell in your body?

I surmise that it is the same reason that let the disciples know that Moses & Elijah were recognizable. They were the disciples ancestors so surely they had some of the glory of God upon them and everybody knew who they were.

There’s my .02 cents.

1 Like

That is amazing! No reason to doubt you knowing that I heard other peoples’ testimony of Jesus visiting them. I suppose there was no need to ask Him if He believes He came in the flesh(1 John 4:3). I’m not going to ask you if you were floored, fearful or simply just whaaaauuuh? When you said, “Which speaks to every cell in your body?” That’s enough.

1 Like

I think I’m with Thomas (Didymus, the twin) on this fabulous account.

KP

1 Like

The question mark was a typo, lol. I know it because every cell of my being knew who He was.

Was I floored? Funny you should ask that, I also experienced the terror of the Lord that day! What happened was He entered the room first and I felt Him ‘over there’ then He spoke and told me to pray for a certain Brother in Christ because he needs help…

I think I did the most stupidest thing I could do, I questioned Him ! I said, why? what happened? Is he ok? He did not rebuke me in any way but He basically repeated what he said to me pray for him and He added he needs help pray for him right now…And when He said that, He slightly changed His tone just a wee bit. Sort of that tone us parents use with their kids when we mean, no backtalk just do it or it wont go well with you, that tone! Brother, I felt terror in my heart. I immediately said, Yes, Lord and then went into prayer for my friend…

I learned a very good lesson that day. Anytime the Lord comes and tells you to do something, the only correct answer is, Yes Lord. !! I felt the fear from the tone, but He continued to radiate Love so I was still feeling that at the same time. I prayed and asked forgiveness for Him not striking me dumb like Zachariah was in the temple for questioning the Angel Gabriel . Thank you Lord, I know the answer now! YES Lord! Thank you for not striking me dumb! It was scary, I tell you. But my friend and Brother in Christ was all right. I pm’d him on a christian site to ask what happened and tell Him the Lord had me pray for him, because the Lord did not answer my questions before leaving. Then I’m sitting there wondering what happened. 4 hours later he got back to me. He was in some adult school taking classes, a small school, everyone knows everyone. His blood sugar went bad and he left the classroom to go to the vending machine for a sweet drink to help him…He didn’t make it and collapsed in the hallway. Classes were in session so no one way in hallways except him. Then he said a stranger wearing a suit walked up to him and said, I am here to help, what do you need? So he told him OJ from the vending machine and the guy (angel) got him some to drink and then, was gone. He tried to find out who that was that helped, so he asked all the people did you see a guy in a suit, a stranger? No one saw him but he got help! Praise the Lord, that was time sensitive and I could have botched it (Yikes)…Praise the Lord He got help, and I learned to listen better.

1 Like

That’s ok Brother I guess you kind of had to be there? I know what happened and should share my testimonies and truths with whoever I can. Some will have ears to hear it, others may not.

Above is more details to what happened and the important thing is that, Brother Mike did get help, and I grew in the Lord that day!

1 Like