First, welcome @Hangal, Glad you are here.
Absolutely not. The Bible is the infallible, living, breathing Word of God. The Word has the power of life and death. It is NOT another religious book. It is the Word of God.
God did not. He created male and female to come together as one flesh. Man created LGBTQ BS through the lusts of the flesh.
He doesn’t, we do. We choose what paths we take, what we do. Ultimately, even where we end up going. It is all about choices. Remember, the devil is real, and he can bless you with riches and fame, as long as you stay away from Jesus.
Again, God doesn’t. We do these things out of our fallen and lustful flesh. I’m trying to answer all quickly, so if you would like Bible verses to back what I’m telling you, please ask.
God created perfect humans. When Adam gave authority of this world over to the devil, the hearts of people became evil. This is the whole reason Jesus died for us. Hell was never intended for man, but the devil and his angels.
A question that some wrestle with a lot. Free will is the most common philosophical response. It suggests that for humans to have the capacity for genuine love and virtue, they must also have the capacity for genuine rebellion and evil. A robot programmed to say “I love you” isn’t actually loving you; it’s just executing code. God deemed a world with free beings—even if they cause suffering—to be “better” or more meaningful than a world of “automata” who do good only because they have no other choice.
Then you have the “greater good theory” (The “Irenaean” View), named after the early church father Irenaeus. This view suggests that humans were created “incomplete” or as “infants” spiritually. True moral character isn’t something you can just be given; it must be forged through struggle, temptation, and even failure. The “Fall” wasn’t a mistake that ruined the plan, but a necessary environment for “soul-making.” In this view, a person who chooses to return to God after knowing sin is “higher” than a person who stayed “innocent” simply because they never knew an alternative.
The Aesthetic Argument: This is a more abstract philosophical take. It argues that a universe with a full range of experiences—light and dark, tragedy and triumph, fall and redemption—is a more “complete” and “beautiful” expression of reality than a flat, perfect one. You can’t appreciate the depth of a hero’s story without a conflict to overcome. God’s attributes (like mercy, justice, and grace) couldn’t be fully expressed or known by anyone unless there was a situation that required them.
Then you have a view, I believe my friend on here believes. The sovereignty/mystery. This is the perspective that suggests that God’s reasons are simply beyond human comprehension (Isaiah 55:8-9). If God is truly infinite and we are finite, it’s arrogant to assume we could judge His “cost-benefit analysis” for creation. The “glory” God receives through the entire story of humanity—including the parts we find tragic—is worth the price, even if we can’t see how from our perspective.
Continued…