Postapostolic Developments
After the time of the apostles, the church began to develop the meaning of baptism and instructions regarding its usage and practice. The Didache (ca. ad 100), one of the church’s earliest-known documents related to Christian theological practice, provides specific instructions for baptism. The instructions of the Didache indicate a highly developed liturgy and understanding of baptism in the late first century:
• The people receiving baptism (baptizands) were to first recite “all these things” (Did. 7:1), a reference to the ethical teachings of the first six chapters of the Didache. This implies that a catechetical process was already underway in the first century of the church’s existence.
• The baptizers and baptizands were to fast before the baptismal event (Did. 7:4).
• “Triune” baptism (baptism in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) in “living” water (a river or stream) was preferred (Did. 7:1). If running water was unavailable, then baptism should take place in “other” cold water (Did. 7:2). If none of these options were available, the baptizer should pour water over the baptizand’s head three times in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Did. 7:3).
Two additional texts provide further detail into baptism:
• The Apostolic Tradition (traditionally attributed to Hippolytus, ca. ad 200) notes that baptizands were naked and recommends that men and women be separated (Apostolic Tradition 21:1–7).
• The Apostolic Tradition also notes that the baptizand would be anointed with oil by a deacon or deaconess, and the elder would anoint the baptizands once more after their baptism (Apostolic Tradition 21:8–9).
• The Didascalia Apostolorum (ca. ad 230) notes that baptism involved a traditional Trinitarian formula as well as the impartation of the Holy Spirit after baptism (Didascalia Apostolorum 3:12).
The Epistle of Barnabas (ca. ad 70–130) contains a discussion of baptism that offers insights into the theological interpretation of baptism in the early church. The author argues that the Jewish people have interpreted the Mosaic laws too literally, suggesting “an allegorical interpretation of the Old Testament” instead. He argues that Jews do not possess a baptism for the remission of sins like Christians possess (Barnabas, 11:1). The author quotes Psa 1, and Ezek 47:12, and several passages in Isaiah (Isa 16:1–2; 45:2–3; 33:16–18) that use water imagery, implying that these verses do not merit literal interpretation, but rather are foreshadowing references to baptism (Stander and Louw, Baptism in the Early Church, 37).
Barnabas also uses language of “going down” into the water and “coming up” out of the water (Barn. 11:8, 11), indicating that immersion was the preferred mode of baptism. While this reference could simply mean that the baptizands descended and ascended from the banks of rivers or streams, other references in early Christian literature generally use this language to refer to immersion (Stander and Louw, Baptism in the Early Church, 37). The author concludes chapter 11 by noting that when we are baptized, “we go down into the water laden with sins and filth, and rise up from it bearing fruit in the heart, resting our fear and hope on Jesus in the spirit” (11:11). These words indicate the symbolic nature of baptism—that it is an outward, visible sign of inward spiritual transformation.
Bibliography
Beasley-Murray, G. R. Baptism in the New Testament. Eugene, Ore.: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2006.
Dockery, David. “Baptism” in The InterVarsity Press Dictionary of the New Testament. Ed. Daniel Reid. Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity Press, 2004.
Ferguson, Everett. Baptism in the Early Church: History, Theology, and Liturgy in the First Five Centuries. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2009.
Klawans, Jonathan. Impurity and Sin in Ancient Judaism. Oxford University Press, USA, 2004.
McKnight, Scot. A Light Among the Gentiles. Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress, 1991.
J.