I am not sure what your point is. So, Albuquerque is a dangerous place. Is there some connection between that and immigration across the southern border? Who is comkiting those crimes? (Evidence please.)
Again, blaming crime on a class of people who immgrate across the southern border is nothing but racist propaganda.
I am not name calling, any more than you are. I say what I believe to be true. Some people clearly behave like bigots and Pharisres.
I don’t love terrorists. Howvcan you even suggest such an absurd thing?
Don’t you realize that by far the greatest percentage of immigrants are here legally but Trump demonizes all of them.
Did you know that Elon Musk arrived as an illegal immigrant?
And Trump’s grandfather was a German immigrant?
The whole issue revolves around bigotry and hatred; justice simply doesn’t matter.
Pure fantasy! That is not “due process”. A person can be a legal immigrant but not yet a citizen. Try getting your facts straight.
Benny, when someone starts a sentence with “I’m not name-calling,” and ends it with “bigots and Pharisees,” they’ve basically brought the stones to the stoning and then claimed clean hands.
Let’s unpack the rest:
No one said you love terrorists. But if you oppose deporting them because of how Trump talks, then you’re letting rhetoric override righteousness. That’s not moral high ground—it’s emotional quicksand.
Most immigrants are legal? Absolutely. No one’s arguing otherwise. That’s why they’re not the ones being deported. Trump didn’t demonize “all immigrants.” He targeted illegal entry and criminal activity. If your outrage can’t distinguish between a gang member and a green card holder, you’re not defending justice—you’re blurring it.
Elon Musk? Entered on a student visa and later adjusted status legally. That’s not illegal immigration. That’s a legal process. Let’s not rewrite biographies to fit talking points.
Trump’s ancestry? Yes, his family immigrated—legally. Again, that’s not the issue. The debate is about lawlessness, not lineage.
And finally: “Justice doesn’t matter”? That statement right there is the real tragedy. Justice matters deeply—to God, to Scripture, and to every person who played by the rules. Mercy without justice isn’t compassion. It’s corruption.
Bigotry isn’t calling out illegal behavior.
Bigotry is refusing to apply the same standard to everyone—legal or not.
Leftist progressives like to patty cake by painting with broad strokes and diverting attention to justify their lack of reality. I really cannot see that Harris would have been a better choice. Bigot, Racist Fundamental. Right Wing Trump supporter here (or so I have been called)…don’t forget Southern Gun Owner also - that can be added into your psychological profile if you like
Send them all back …they can stand in line
LOL!!! It’s clear that you have swallowed the full right-wing propaganda package. What a farce!
Prime example: You say that Karris, a black woman, is a bigot and a racist. She is a VICTIM of bigotry and racism!
Oh, we’ve got ourselves a classic forum bonfire brewing—labels flying, sarcasm dripping, and substance circling the drain. Time to inject some clarity and calm without letting the truth get trampled.
Here’s what I suggest posting to reframe the tone and replant the conversation in something resembling sanity:
Hold up, both of you.
BrotherDavid, throwing down the whole “send them all back” line might feel cathartic, but it’s about as useful to this discussion as yelling “fire” in a theology class. Immigration policy isn’t fixed by slogans—it’s fixed by restoring order under the law. That means securing the border and respecting due process. If someone’s here illegally, yes—line up or ship out. But we don’t need to turn this into a bumper sticker contest.
And Benny, “LOL” and identity politics don’t make a point—they dodge one. No one said Harris is a bigot because she’s Black. That’s your leap, not anyone else’s. If someone calls out her ideology, that’s not racism—it’s disagreement. We’re not doing the race card tap dance every time someone critiques a leftist.
Can we stop the tribal name-calling and get back to actual issues? Like maybe how immigration law works, what the Constitution says, and how we apply justice without weaponizing skin color or political tribes?
If we can’t do that, we’re not debating—we’re just flinging memes with keyboards.
Let’s elevate this. Or at least stop digging.
A post was merged into an existing topic: What Did Jesus Really Mean by “Love Your Neighbor”?
Are you a Native American? If not, why should some immigrants be deported but not others? Are all immigrants evil in your eyes?
Do you really want to spend tens of thousand dollars feeding, housing, and trying each of ten million immigrants who came into your country when Joe Biden opened up the southern border? You know we can’t do that. Due process for illegal immigrants is to catch them and send them back where they came from. I’ve got no problem giving them a hearing to prove they are United States citizens.
Due process isn’t a luxury we apply when it’s affordable—it’s a constitutional requirement, not a budget item. We don’t waive the rule of law because the numbers are high. That’s not justice—that’s panic policy.
And no, we don’t need to give each person a full courtroom drama. But we do need a process that confirms identity and status before deporting someone. Because mistakes happen. Citizens have been wrongfully deported before. That’s not compassion—that’s incompetence with consequences.
If the system’s overwhelmed, fix the system. But don’t burn the Constitution because enforcement is expensive. The law doesn’t disappear when the numbers get inconvenient.