Exploring the Writings of Maria Valtorta and Other Private Revelations

Theology
1
Exploring the Writings of Maria Valtorta and Other Private Revelations

Exploring the Writings of Maria Valtorta and Other Private Revelations
Exploring the Writings of Maria Valtorta and Other Private Revelations1200×630 127 KB

As Christians reflect on divine revelation, biblical authority, and spiritual curiosity, we invite your voice in Crosswalk Forums.
#BibleCanon #PrivateRevelation #christianforums #crosswalkforums #forums #crosswalk #faithcommunity #faithforums

From Maria Valtorta’s “The Poem of the Man-God” to the so-called “lost books of the Bible,” Christians across traditions have debated whether writings outside of Scripture can offer real insight—or if they pose a spiritual danger. Some view these texts as deeply moving personal revelations that supplement our understanding of Jesus’ life. Others see them as misleading distractions from God’s revealed Word.

Maria Valtorta, for instance, claimed to receive visions of Jesus’ life in vivid detail—visions which have inspired many and drawn sharp criticism from others. Her works are still widely read and debated, especially among those who long for a deeper emotional picture of Christ. But should they carry spiritual weight?

This discussion ties into a broader issue: How did we get the Bible as we know it? Why were some books included while others were left out? The canon was formed through prayerful discernment, apostolic authority, and theological consistency. Books like the Gospel of Thomas or the Book of Enoch, while intriguing, didn’t meet the criteria of early Christian leaders and were excluded.

Still, the human heart often seeks stories beyond the page—especially stories that claim divine origin. That raises important questions:

How should Christians handle books that claim private revelation?
What role, if any, do these writings play in personal devotion or theological formation?
Are we right to be cautious—or missing something beautiful and inspired?

“The Bible is God’s sufficient revelation, but history shows that people often hunger for more—especially when they feel the silence of heaven.”

Have you read any works like Maria Valtorta’s?
What role—if any—should private revelations play in the life of a believer?

Explore more about how the Bible canon was formed and how to view other spiritual writings:

1 Like
3

Excellent @Fritzpw_Admin.

Johann.

4

How Did the Early Church Recognize the New Testament Books?

5

Thank you for creating this thread.

I have read the following:

And, let it be known, that Jesus, using Maria Valtorta as His “pen”, stated that The Gospel as Revealed to Me, or The Poem of the Man-God, “is not a canonical book. But it remains an inspired book”, and this goes for the other books above as well. (The Notebooks: 1945-1950)

Additional recommended reading material:

6

yes im reading the poem of Man-God
@Soul

1 Like
7

How do you feel as you read it?

8

I feel as if Jesus is talking to me, something personal. You know i get that feeling as if Jesus is just beside me, a warm feeling in my heart…

9

Trust those feelings, because Satan and his servants can’t produce true peace, love, joy, and so on. Thank you for sharing. Which part are you at?

10

im currently in Chapter 106: Jesus Is Driven Out of Nazareth and He Comforts His Mother. Reflections on Four Contemplations.
Long journey but im still in Vol 1. I think there are 5 Vols, im almost completing the 1st one, will take 15 more days to be accurate, so in 1-1.5 months i can complete 1 vol, thus it seems possible that i may be able to complete the 5 vol in the span of 1 yr… :grinning_face: i was calculating how many days it actually took me
A journey to remember

11

I didnt know how time went by, i just started reading, i just read and read and read..something caught me, i wasnt able to stop…at morning, at night, at evening, i was thinking about it all the time…

12

Maria Valtorta describes her visions of scenes from Jesus’s life with such precision and beauty that you feel like you’re present in every scene journeying with Jesus. And, you come to know Him more personally too, which deepens the reader’s relationship with Him. Most of the scenes you read about are found in Scripture, but you’re not only reading them in full, but you’re living them in a way as well because it’s in vision form, and so this Work helps one to understand Scripture. And no one can reasonably deny that understanding of Scripture isn’t needed due to the many differing interpretations of it, translation errors, and so on. God was so good to bring Scripture to life for us by taking recourse to visions.

13

Thats true that is the beauty of catholic mysticism. Many people dont know about how the catholics define certain categories..
I think this is the most amazing gift u have given me
I also like Anne Catherine Emmerich’s “The complete visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich”

14

It is a gift, a loving gift from our living, loving, and interactive God. And, Maria Valtorta was loving and faithful to Him by writing all she saw and heard through enduring constant suffering.

1 Like
15

You’ve covered a lot of ground in a short period of time! Shouldn’t take you long at all! You know what’s funny? The Poem of the Man-God is over four-thousand pages and it still doesn’t cover all that Jesus did during His three year ministry lol, but that’s ok. What God did give us through using Maria Valtorta is already such a wealth of knowledge. May we never stop thanking Him for it.

So true! I continue to re-read them.

16

Oh i didnt know about that, it new for me, reading about the hidden life of Jesus..I have read Anne Catherine Emmerich’s before, but yeah its first time im reading Maria Valtorta’s writings

17

Ah, “trust those feelings” — the anthem of every spiritual shipwreck who traded the compass of Scripture for the winds of emotion. Soul, I say this with all the gentleness a theological thunderclap allows: feelings are not infallible. The devil doesn’t need to manufacture true peace when he can fake it just long enough to pull someone out of the Word and into the weeds.

You say Satan can’t produce peace? Tell that to the false prophets of Jeremiah 6:14 — “They dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious. ‘Peace, peace,’ they say, when there is no peace.” Satan’s greatest trick isn’t producing chaos. It’s producing counterfeit calm to keep folks comfortably deceived.

And now we’ve got Maria Valtorta — self-proclaimed visionary of 4,000 pages of “Jesus scenes” — being treated like a spiritual cinematographer, when Scripture gives us everything we need for life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3). The idea that God needed to supplement His Word with dream sequences from a bedridden mystic is not just misguided — it’s a direct slap in the face to the sufficiency of Scripture.

Hebrews 1:1-2 says God “spoke in times past to the fathers by the prophets, but in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son.” That’s final. Not by Maria. Not by visions. Not by 4,000-page fanfiction of the Gospels. If your understanding of Scripture “needs” extra-biblical revelation to come alive, maybe what you’re missing isn’t more detail — maybe it’s the Holy Spirit who actually illuminates the Word (John 16:13), not private visions from 1940s Italy.

This isn’t about denying Maria’s suffering. It’s about refusing to exalt her private experiences over the public, preserved, perfect Word of God. 2 Timothy 3:16 doesn’t say “All visions are God-breathed.” It says all Scripture is. That’s the standard. That’s the sword.

So no, I won’t thank God for “The Poem of the Man-God.” I’ll thank Him for the real thing — the Gospels — where Jesus is revealed by the Spirit, not by a pen claiming private access.

—Sincere Seeker. Scripturally savage. Here for the Truth.

18

@Samuel_23, brother, I see the hunger in you. You’re not drifting—you’re searching. But let me give you a word of caution, not as a critic but as a fellow soldier watching your six.

You said it feels personal, like Jesus is speaking directly to you through Maria Valtorta’s writings. You feel warmth. You feel peace. But here’s the question you need to hold up like a lamp in a cave: is it truth or is it just tender? Because the enemy doesn’t tempt saints with sulfur. He tempts them with the aroma of holiness laced with error.

Scripture says Satan masquerades as an angel of light. He doesn’t lead people into darkness by handing them pitchforks—he hands them glowing books filled with spiritual emotion and just enough Bible to keep them nodding. Proverbs 14:12 warns us there’s a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.

You said you read and read and couldn’t stop. That something caught you. But addiction to a religious experience is not the same as being rooted in the truth. The devil doesn’t mind if you feel close to a false Jesus, as long as it’s not the one revealed in Scripture.

Valtorta’s writings are not just poetic extras. They claim to reveal new scenes from Jesus’ life—new details, new visions, new dialogue. That is dangerous. Revelation warns against adding to God’s Word. And while that specifically references John’s apocalypse, the principle stands tall: God doesn’t need help finishing His sentences.

You mentioned Anne Catherine Emmerich too. I know her work. Similar vibe. Emotional. Mystical. Beautiful even. But truth isn’t measured in beauty. It’s measured in biblical alignment. If it can’t be found in the Gospels, it shouldn’t be shaping your view of Christ.

So here’s the challenge. Test every spirit. Compare every “Jesus” with the One who walked through Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. And if what you’re reading draws more awe to the vision than the Word, more intimacy with the emotion than the cross, then it’s time to back up and recalibrate.

The real Jesus doesn’t need a ghostwriter. He gave us the Gospels. He gave us the Spirit. And He gave us enough.

Come back to the Book, brother.

—Sincere Seeker. Stay grounded. Stay sharp. Stay in the Word.

1 Like
19

@SincereSeeker , i see, i keep scriptures first and compare the private revelation to check if it aligns with the Scripture.
From what i have read from the poem of Man-God its not exactly word to word but thats the whole point of Maria Valtorta’s visions that they give a deeper image and understanding about the gospels, so of course we cannot say its word to word like gospel, it does have scenery, emotions etc.
Now the question is did Jesus really appear to Maria Valtorta, because
It shldnt be that today if we see Isaiah, and he puts forward what God told him, then will we question Isaiah like this, or will it be different, similarly God appeared to many prophets, so why can’t He not appear to Maria Valtorta, how can we verify this is the dilemma im facing currently @SincereSeeker
God can reveal His will to whomever He will, it can be me or you, like He appeared to Young Samuel or Moses, did we ever question them, so what about Maria Valtorta, maybe Jesus could have appeared to her..we never know right..I havent studied much about Private revelations, any help would be grateful.
Peace
Sam

20

@Samuel_23,

You’ve just hit the center of the target. This is the real question, not the fluff that dances around the edges. You’re asking how to know if Jesus truly appeared to Maria Valtorta, and you’re comparing it to how God spoke to Isaiah or Samuel. Fair question. Now here’s the hard truth.

The difference isn’t in whether God can speak to someone today. Of course He can. He’s God. He’s not on mute. The question is: how do we test if what someone claims is truly from Him?

1 John 4:1 commands us to test the spirits. That means every dream, every vision, every voice. The bar isn’t feelings or how personally it speaks to you. The test is whether it aligns completely and unshakably with what God has already revealed in His Word.

Isaiah, Samuel, and Moses didn’t just say “God spoke to me.” They were confirmed by miracles, by fulfilled prophecy, and ultimately by the endorsement of Christ Himself. Their words didn’t float in spiritual mystery. They became part of Scripture. Valtorta’s writings are not that. They are private, unconfirmed, and filled with details that go far beyond what is written in the Gospels. That should not excite us. That should alarm us.

Revelation is not open-ended. Jude 1:3 says the faith has been delivered once for all to the saints. Not once and then added to. Not once and then upgraded in Italy centuries later.

Maria’s writings aren’t just commentary. They include new dialogue, new scenes, and new emotional layers that subtly reshape how you view Jesus. And that is a red line. If something adds to Scripture or rewrites it with extra emotion or detail, it is not a companion—it is a competitor.

Galatians 1:8 could not be clearer. Even if an angel shows up with a different gospel, let him be accursed. That’s how serious God is about guarding the purity of His truth. Maria’s “Jesus” didn’t just repeat the Gospels. He expanded and embellished them. That’s not harmless. That’s a counterfeit.

God can speak. But He does not contradict Himself. He does not need to fill in narrative gaps He intentionally left. He does not send secret add-ons to a completed Gospel.

So test it, brother. Hold it up to the Word. Not just for contradiction, but for sufficiency. Because if it takes you away from depending fully on the Bible, even a little, then it’s already taken too much.

That’s how we know.

—Sincere Seeker. Stay grounded. Stay sharp. Stay in the Word.

1 Like
21

@Samuel_23, you and I have talked before about how we thank God for the canonical books that we have. We also recognize that God is a living, loving, and interactive Being. As Jesus said about The Poem of the Man-God, it “is not a canonical book. But it remains an inspired book ”, and this goes for the other books above as well (The Notebooks: 1945-1950). We understand that God could start speaking to us about a myriad of things at any moment and want us to write down what He’s saying, and share it with those who will listen. Those writings wouldn’t be canonical, but they would be inspired, because God is the Author. You not only feel that The Poem of the Man-God is from God, but do you see it contradicting Scripture in any way so far in your reading? And haven’t you reviewed the proofs in support of her writings have a supernatural origin?