Is Catholicism a Branch of Christianity or Something Else?

Theology
22

You assert that the Bible does not command rituals or liturgies. Historically and biblically, that is incomplete. While Scripture alone is inspired (2 Timothy 3:16–17), the New Testament itself describes ritual acts and liturgical forms: baptism (Matthew 28:19), the Eucharist (1 Corinthians 11:23–26), and prayers of the Church (Acts 2:42). The apostles established patterns of worship that were communal, orderly, and spiritually formative. Liturgies are not arbitrary “feelings” or vain repetitions; they are sacred expressions of Christ’s command, grounded in apostolic authority.

You reference incense and Levitical sacrifices, correctly noting that the Old Covenant was fulfilled in Christ (Hebrews 9:9–10). However, the Church does not treat these rituals as salvific works. Rather, liturgical elements like incense, bells, and sacred vessels are symbolic and catechetical, teaching spiritual truths, directing the heart to God, and uniting the community in worship. They are signs, not substitutes, for Christ’s work. Hebrews 9 and Matthew 27 affirm that Christ fulfills the Law; the liturgy expresses that fulfillment in visible, communal forms, not as a replacement for faith.

You insist that Scripture alone is sufficient, but this overlooks historical reality. The canon of Scripture itself was recognized, transmitted, and interpreted by the Church. Apostolic Tradition safeguards correct interpretation, preserves the unity of faith, and ensures that Scripture is applied faithfully. 2 Thessalonians 2:15 commands believers to hold fast to “the traditions that you were taught, whether by word or by letter.” Tradition is not a human addition; it is the apostolic witness that hands down the gospel faithfully.

You caution that beauty is no substitute for truth. That is correct — yet the Church teaches that beauty, symbol, and form are not opposed to truth; they serve as means to enter more fully into the mystery of God. The hymns, icons, and liturgies of Orthodoxy and Catholicism do not replace Scripture; they proclaim, illustrate, and internalize the gospel. Romans 10:17 reminds us that faith comes by hearing — the liturgy is a vehicle for Scripture and apostolic teaching to enter the heart and mind.

@ILOVECHRIST, welcome, brother, to Orthodoxy
Peace
Sam

23

I really love it, brother @Samuel_23 , and I want to sincerely thank you for teaching me over this past month.

24

What you’ve written makes it crystal clear why it is so important to measure everything by the Word of God, not by what men say. The Bible plainly declares, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9). That rules out sacraments, penance, and any system of works as means of salvation. Paul also wrote, “To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness” (Romans 4:5). That is justification by faith alone, apart from anything else.

James 2 never teaches salvation by works, but rather that true faith is demonstrated genuine by works. Abraham was already reckoned righteous before God long before he offered Isaac (Genesis 15:6 compared with James 2:21). Scripture interprets itself, and it never makes works a part of justification.

As to “Tradition,” Jesus said, “Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition” (Matthew 15:6). Paul never taught that oral traditions outside of Scripture would rule the church for all time, but instead he commanded believers to hold fast to the written Word (2 Thessalonians 2:15 balanced with 2 Timothy 3:16–17). The Bible alone “gives the knowledge of salvation through the faith which is in Christ Jesus” and “equips the man of God thoroughly…unto all good works.” Nothing else is necessary.

Apostolic succession, sacraments, and church hierarchy are never taught in the New Testament as necessary for salvation. The only thing necessary for salvation is repentance and faith in Christ alone. Peter himself preached, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

Catholicism may say it is Christian, but by adding works, tradition, and man’s authority to the gospel, it is really preaching another gospel. Paul said, “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:8). The truth is plain: salvation is in Christ alone, by grace alone, through faith alone, revealed in Scripture alone. Anything else is a lie.

1 Like
25

See lets learn more brother, now its time to go deeper.
Lets take bdavidc’s post and learn some more.
The insufficiency of Sola Scriptura
Some say that “Scripture alone is sufficent for faith and practice” predicated upon 2 Tim 3:16-17, represents a post-Reformation construal that elides the historical and ecclesial matrix from which the canon emerged (St. Basil the Great’s On the Holy Spirit ch 27, where he distinguishes between the written and the unwritten traditions), maintains that Holy Scripture is not an autonomous artifact but a constitutive element of the broader Apostolic Tradition. This is explicitly enjoined in 2 Thess 2:15 “Stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.” Here, St. Paul bifurcates the modalities of transmission, oral and epistolary, without subordinating one to the other. Some appeal to 2 Tim 3:16-17, which affirms the inspiration and profitability of Scripture for equipping the believer, does not negate this; rather it presupposes the interpretive authority of the Church @ILOVECHRIST, which St. Paul writes as the pillar and bulwark of the truth in 1 Tim 3:15
To posit the Scripture’s self-sufficiency is to overlook its canonical formation: the Church, through ecumenical councils, be it Carthage or Trullo at 397 and 692 AD respectively, discerned the canon amida milieu of apocryphal texts, guided by the liturgical usage and patristic attestation. As St. Vincent of Lérins articulates in his Commonitorium (ch. 2), orthodoxy is that which has been believed “everywhere, always, by all”. Thus rituals and liturgies from the times of the fathers, are not antiquarian impositions but the vividied exegesis of Scripture within the ekklesia. The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, for instance, is replete with Scriptural itations (over 200 direct allusions) rendering it a performative heremeneutic that actualizes the Word in communal praxis. Far from supplanting Christ and His Word, Orthodox liturgy is the enfleshment of that Word, echoing the Incarnation itself (John 1:14), wherein the divine economy engages the material order.

Ritual and the Flesh
The critique that “the flesh loves outward rituals and forms” invoking Israel’s prophetic rebuke in Isa 1:11-17, miscontrues the prophetic intent while pertuating a gnostic-tinged dualism antithetical to biblical holism, take careful note here @ILOVECHRIST, my brother, see:
Isaiah’s condemnation targets ritual per se but ITS DECOUPLING FROM THE ETHICAL FIDELITY: the offerings are rejected because they mask unrighteousness, not because externals are inherently profane. Orthodox anthropology, drawing from Gen 1:26-27, and patristic synthesis affirms the psychosomatic unity of humanity, body and soul are co-constitutive in imaging God. Worship, therefore, must encompass the sensorial and corporeal, lest it devolve into a disembodied intellectualism.
The NT attests to this: The Eucharist, commanded by Christ (Luke 22:19, 1 Cor 11:23-26), is a ritual par excellence, involving bread and wine as materal signs of His Body and Blood. St. Paul’s admonition underscores its sacramental gravity, not as outward form but as mystical participation in Christ. Similarly, baptism and anoiting as in Rom 6:3-4 and James 5:14 engages the senses, fulfilling the OT types without abrogating their symbolic depth. @bdavidc’s dichotomy here, between flesh and true worship ignores the Resurrection’s vindication of materiality (Luke 24:39, Philippians 3:21), wherein Christ’s glorified body prefigures our own. Orthodox liturgy with its icons, incense, and prostrations, thus rehabilitates the flesh, channeling it toward theosis (2 Peter 1:4), the participatory deification wherein humans commune with the divine energies (St. Gregory Palamas, Triads I.3.5). This is not carnal indulgence but a therapeutic ascent contra the prophetic warning which Orthodoxy hymnody echoes in its call to repentence (e.g the Great Canon of St. Andrew of Crete)

The Pure Gospel: Orthodoxy’s fidelity to grace, faith and Christ
The charge that Orthodoxy adulterates the pure gospel by additions, citing Gal 1:8 and Eph 2:8-9, presumes a forensic soteriology alien to the Eastern Fathers. Orthodox doctrines affirms salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone, but contextualizes this within a synergistic framework (Philippians 2:12-13 “work out your own salvation…for it is God who works in you”). The solas of reformation fragment the organic unity of faith and works (James 2:14-26), whereas Orthodoxy views sacraments as efficacious means of grace (ex opere operato in a qualified sense), not meritorious works, @bdavidc .
The Eucharist, for example is not an addition but the fulfillment of John 6:53-56:
“Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.”

Beauty in Orthodoxy is an eschatological icon, reflecting the SPLENDOR OF THE HEAVENLY LITURGY (REV 4-5, 8:3-4). As St. John of Damascus defends in On the Divine Images (III.16) aesthetic forms direct the mind to prototypes, combating iconoclasm’s implicit Docetism. Tradition, far from substituting for Scriptures, safeguards its interpretation against individualistic eisegesis, as evidenced by the Christological controversies resolved at Nicea and Chalcedon.
**The Anathema in Galatians 1:8 applies to distortions like Arianism, not to the Church’s custodial role
Amen brother

26

The difference is this: the New Testament commands baptism and the Lord’s Supper, but nowhere commands incense, bells, icons, or man-made liturgies. Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are both given by Christ Himself (Matthew 28:19; 1 Corinthians 11:23–26). But adding other rituals and claiming they “express” the gospel is exactly what Jesus condemned when He said, “In vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Matthew 15:9). The early church “continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers” (Acts 2:42), simple obedience, not layers of ritual.

2 Thessalonians 2:15 is also abused to get to “Tradition”, but Paul did not give authority to traditions centuries later, he was commanding them to hold fast to what he himself taught them directly as an apostle. And the same Paul later said, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God…that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works” (2 Timothy 3:16–17). Scripture is sufficient. If Tradition were necessary, Paul would not say Scripture makes the man of God complete.

As for beauty, yes, creation reflects God’s glory (Psalm 19: 1), but worship must be “in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24). The “truth” is the Word of God (John 17:17). Beauty, symbols, and rituals may appeal to the senses, but they cannot add one ounce of saving grace. Romans 10: 17 says faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God, not by incense, icons, or liturgy.

The bottom line is this: Christ is enough. His finished work is enough. His Word is enough. Anything added to that may look spiritual, but it is what Paul warned of, “a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof” (2 Timothy 3:5).

1 Like
27

Ending with:
Incense and Typological continuity
The specific objection to incense, relegated to the “Old Covenant temple system” (Exodus 30:7–8) and deemed obsolete per Hebrews 9:9–10 and Matthew 27:51, overlooks the typological hermeneutic pervasive in patristic exegesis. Hebrews portrays Christ as the eternal High Priest, fulfilling, not annihilating the Levitical order. The tearing of the veil signifies universal access to the holy (Hebrews 10:19–22), but does not preclude ritual expressions; indeed, Revelation depicts heavenly worship with incense symbolizing prayers (8:3–4), a motif echoed in Orthodox practice (Psalm 141:2: “Let my prayer arise in thy sight as incense”).
Early Church evidence corroborates this: the Didache (ca. AD 100) prescribes Eucharistic liturgies, while Clement of Rome (1 Clement 40–41) invokes temple analogies for Christian order. Incense, as in the Liturgy of St. James (the earliest extant form), evokes the Shekinah glory, now manifest in the Spirit-filled assembly (1 Corinthians 3:16). Christ’s fulfillment liberates from legalistic bondage, but invites participatory reenactment, as in the anaphora’s memorial (anamnesis) of His sacrifice. Thus, Orthodox rituals are not regressions but pneumatic actualizations, wherein the “time of reformation” (Hebrews 9:10) inaugurates a transfigured cultus.

28

The Bible never teaches that the true church has an unbroken line of bishops or any outward institution. Jesus said, “Upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). That “rock” is not a line of bishops, but Christ Himself (1 Corinthians 3:11). Scripture is very clear in its definition of the church, and it is not a “branch” or a building with clergy and religious rites. “For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body” (1 Corinthians 12:13). The true church is spiritual and not an outward organization with liturgy and hierarchy.

Your teaching of apostolic succession as men have defined it is never taught in Scripture. The apostles did appoint elders and overseers (Acts 14: 23; Titus 1:5), but they were not promising that the sacraments or authority were dependent on an unbroken line of ordinations. In fact, it’s quite the opposite: Paul instructed his readers not to look to men, but to God: “That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God” (1 Corinthians 2:5). The authority we need today is not the man-made apostolic succession; it is the Word of God which alone can make us “thoroughly furnished unto all good works” (2 Timothy 3:16–17).

You claim we have unity in Catholic and Orthodox structures, but Scripture teaches that unity is only found in Christ and His truth: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” (John 17:17). Jesus prayed that His followers would be one, but that unity is not in belonging to a visible organization. Unity without truth is worthless.

Sacraments like the Eucharist are called in the Bible the bread and cup of the memorial of Christ’s finished work, not a sacrifice or a source of grace (1 Corinthians 11:23–26). Hebrews 10: 14 says, “For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.” The cross is sufficient; no ritual can add to it.

In conclusion, the true church is not Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant by name. The true church is composed of all who repent and believe the gospel of Christ crucified and risen (Romans 10:9–10; 1 Corinthians 15:3–4). Anything added to that gospel, whether it is apostolic succession or traditions or liturgy, is another gospel, and Paul said plainly, “If any man preach any other gospel…let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:9).

1 Like
29

Placing faith in men and their traditions rather than in God’s Word is not of God. The Scripture says, “Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition” (Matt 15:6). Paul also wrote, “That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God” (1 Cor 2:5). To lead others to rituals, liturgies, or the authority of men in order to come to God is to lead them astray.

Christ is our only High Priest and Mediator (Heb 7:24–25; 1 Tim 2:5). The veil was torn to show that we no longer come to God by rituals or ceremonies but through the One who took away sin by His blood, shed for us (Matt 27:51; Heb 10:19–22). Revelation 8: 3–4 is not speaking of incense literally commanded in New Covenant worship, but the prayers of the saints as incense. Our “incense” is prayer and the fruit of our lips giving thanks to His name (Ps 141:2; Heb 13:15).

To add to God’s Word and make that extra biblical tradition binding on others is to exalt man rather than serve Christ. The Scripture is clear, “If any man preach any other gospel…let him be accursed” (Gal 1:9). The truth is simple: salvation and worship are through Christ alone, by His Word alone, not rituals or the authority of men.

1 Like
30

@bdavidc brother
The assertion that the NT commands solely baptism and the Lord’s supper while proscribing incense, bells and icons rests upon an atomistic exegesis that conflates silence with prohibition
Isnt this a fallacy akin to argumentum ex silentio?
Orthodoxy theolgy, informed by St. Cyril of Jerusalem’s catechetical lectures discerns in Scripture, not an exhaustive codex of rubrics but a seminal kerygma, germinating within the Church’s litrugical matrix. Consider: if explicit commands is the sine qua non, whence the warrant for congregational singing (Eph 5:19, Colossians 3:16), which employs bells or instruments in patristic practice. (e.g St. Ambrose hymns)? Or the imposition of hands in ordination (1 Tim 4:14, 2 TIm 1:6), a ritual act?
The early Church’s anaphora, as attested in the Apostolic Constitutions (Book VIII, ca. AD 380), integrates incense as a pneumatic symbol (drawing from Revelation 5:8; 8:3–4), not as innovation but as eschatological participation.
Matt 15:9’s condemnation of commandments of men targes pharisaic legalism that supplants divine latent (e.g corban evasions, Mark 7:11), not the Church’s interpretive stewardship. Acts 2:42’s depiction of steadfastness in apostles’ doctrine, fellowship, breaking of bread and prayers is not a minimalist blueprint but a synecdoche for communal life wherein prayers encompass structered forms, as evidenced by the Diache’s Eucharistic prayers.

Apostolic Tradition as Living Continuum
Your constrictions of 2 Thess 2:15, to Paul’s direct teachings excluding traditions centuries later, imposes an anachronistic temporal firewall that severs the apostolic succession enshrined in patristic ecclesiology (eg. St. Ireneaus, Against Heresies III.3.1-2). Paul’s enjoins fidelity to paradoseis, traditions, transmitted orally or epistolatry, a mandate echoes in 1 Cor 11:2
“I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to you.”
This paradosis is not static but dynamic, perpetuated through episcopal continuity (Titus 1:5; 1 Clement 42–44), ensuring fidelity amid hermeneutical pluralism.

31

The Anathema in Galatians 1:8 applies to distortions like Arianism, not to the Church’s custodial role

32

Coming back to this post:

Invoking John 4:24’s “spirit and truth” and Romans 10:17’s faith via the Word, the critque posits a noetic primacy that marginalises sensory elements as superfluous to grace.
Yet this verges on a Manichean Dualism, contra the Incarnation’s sanctification of matter (John 1:14, 1 Tim 4:4-5).**
Patristic anthropology (St. Maximus the Confessor, Ambigua 10) views humans as microcosms, wherein sense mediate noetic ascent; icons, incense and liturgies are not grace additives but the vehicles of the uncreated energies (Palamite distinction, Triads III.1.9), facilitating theosis.**
Psalm 19:1’s cosmic glory extends to ecclesial aesthetics, as the Tabernacle’s ornate design (Exo 25-31) typifies the New Covenant splendour (heb 8:5). Faith arises from hearing the Word, but the Word is proclaimed liturgically with symbols ampliying its resonance. To label this as “a form of godliness denying the power” (2 Tim 3:5) misapplies Paul’s eschatological warning agaisnt hypocrisy, not ritual per se.

33

@Samuel_23, brother, this is truly enlightening. Thank you for laying out such a thorough and patient response.

I see now that much of what davidc has argued stems from misunderstandings of Catholic and Orthodox teaching. You’ve clarified several things beautifully:

  1. Salvation and grace – that works, sacraments, and penance do not replace Christ’s saving work but flow from the grace already given. Faith is alive when it bears fruit, fully in line with Scripture (James 2:17–22).

  2. Scripture and Tradition – the Bible did not come to us in isolation. Scripture and Tradition together form the deposit of faith, preserved by the apostles and their successors, ensuring unity and guarding against misinterpretation.

  3. Rituals, liturgy, and the senses – these are not mere outward forms, but a participation in the mystery of Christ, the Incarnation, and theosis. Incense, icons, hymns, and the Eucharist are not extra additions but channels of grace and communal Scripture enacted.

  4. Apostolic succession and the sacraments – the Church does not add to Christ’s work, but faithfully transmits it through ordained ministers and the sacraments, safeguarding the faith against error.

34

@ILOVECHRIST
I will focus on some questions @bdavidc , so that we can get a clear picture of what we are going after.
1. To deem Orthodox liturgies “man-made” begs the question: if the Church, as Christ’s Body (Ephesians 1:22–23), evolves rituals under the Spirit’s guidance (John 16:13), are these not extensions of apostolic fiat?
If the New Testament omits explicit rubrics for worship order—beyond broad exhortations—how does one derive a “simple” model without appealing to post-apostolic traditions, such as those of the Reformers themselves?
2. If Paul deemed Scripture alone adequate, why instruct Timothy to “guard the deposit” (1 Timothy 6:20; 2 Timothy 1:14)—a phrase denoting unwritten traditions—and why does the New Testament itself cite extra-canonical traditions (e.g., Jude 9, 14–15 drawing from Assumption of Moses and 1 Enoch)?
3. If “Christ is enough” precludes additions, why does the New Testament mandate physical acts like laying on hands (Acts 8:17–19) or anointing with oil (James 5:14), which “add” material media to convey the Spirit’s power?
4. Given that the canon was discerned by post-apostolic tradition, how can one invoke scriptural sufficiency without circularly presupposing the Church’s authoritative role in its formation? Would not rejecting tradition undermine the Bible’s own integrity?
5. If sensory appeals are suspect, why does Christ employ parables, miracles, and material symbols (e.g., mud for healing, John 9:6), and why does Revelation depict heavenly worship with incense and visuals? Does minimalism not risk a disembodied gnosticism

35

This is not an issue where the Bible is silent, where God has left us free to choose. It is very clear that worship cannot be “according to tradition” but “according to His Word alone” (Matthew 15:9). Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for worship that was in vain, “teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Matthew 15:9). The Greek word for “commandments” is entalma (ἐντάλμα), which means man-made regulations, laws. That warning applies directly to incense, bells, and icons which God has never commanded for His church. The silence in Scripture is not a blank check to invent; it is a prohibition. “Learn not to go beyond what is written” (1 Corinthians 4:6).

Singing in congregations is commanded. “Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs” (Ephesians 5:19). “Teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs” (Colossians 3:16). These are explicit, positive commands, not inferences or traditions invented by men. The laying on of hands is also commanded in Scripture (Acts 6: 6; 1 Timothy 4:14) and so is not comparable to incense or icons or rituals which are nowhere commanded in the New Testament.

The incense in Revelation is symbolic, not literal. It is interpreted for us in the text: “the smoke of the incense, which came with the prayers of the saints” (Revelation 8:4). The Greek word thumiama (θυμίαμα) can refer to incense, but the Spirit does not leave us in doubt about what it means**; it is symbolic of prayers being offered by the saints**, not a command for churches to burn incense. Likewise in Psalm 141: 2 incense is used as a symbol of prayer. The New Testament fulfillment of that psalm is spiritual, not ritual.

Traditions. The Greek word paradosis (παράδοσις) simply means “what is handed down.” Paul used it positively of the gospel he delivered (2 Thessalonians 2: 15; 1 Corinthians 11:2) and negatively for human traditions that are contrary to God’s Word (Colossians 2:8). He always handed down the same thing, the gospel of Jesus Christ. But what he handed down is now preserved in inspired Scripture, which alone makes the man of God “perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works” (2 Timothy 3:16–17). Scripture never gives authority for a continuing stream of extra-biblical traditions.

The apostles did not deliver a “dynamic” evolving system; they delivered “the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3). That faith is complete, fixed, and sufficient. Add incense, icons, rituals not commanded by God is to add to His Word, something He strictly forbids (Deuteronomy 4:2; Proverbs 30:6; Revelation 22:18).

Simple: worship “in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24) must be bound to the Word of God. Anything else, even if ancient or beautiful, is the commandments of men.

1 Like
36

I can only move to the next post, if you could explain me this, because these are the core-points im stressing about.

Because, after reading posts, I like making questions which show your view and mine as well, but by making it in the question form, the message can be delivered effectively.

37

You call me brother but Scripture defines true brothers as those who abide in the gospel of Christ. “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God” (2 John 9). A brother is one who has believed the true gospel which is salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone apart from works (Ephesians 2:8–9). If you mix the gospel with man’s traditions, the Bible calls that “another gospel” (Galatians 1: 6–9) and those who teach it are not counted as brethren in Christ.

1 Like
38

@bdavidc , Scripture calls true brethren those who abide in Christ (2 John 9), and the Catholic and Orthodox Churches have done precisely that for two millennia: proclaiming salvation by grace through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8–9) while living it visibly through sacraments, prayer, and love. To claim this is “another gospel” ignores both history and Scripture itself — the Church faithfully preserves the apostolic teaching, evident in the lives of countless saints and martyrs, from St. Ignatius of Antioch willingly entering the arena as “God’s wheat” to St. Cecilia singing praise to God as she faced death. These witnesses clung to Christ alone, confirming that the sacraments, liturgy, and Tradition do not replace the gospel but manifest it. John 17 shows that Christ prays for all who follow Him in truth, sanctified by His Word — the visible Church and her faithful are exactly those He prayed for. To deny that Catholics and Orthodox are true Christians is to ignore the historical witness, the continuity of the gospel, and the testimony of those who gave their lives for Christ.

39

Help me with these, brother @bdavidc

40

The Bible itself proclaims its sufficiency. “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works” (2 Timothy 3:16–17). The Greek word for “perfect” is artios, meaning complete, fully qualified. If Scripture makes the man of God complete, then nothing else, (tradition, councils, or rituals) is needed to thoroughly furnish him for every good work.

You quote 2 Thessalonians 2:15 about “traditions” (paradosis, things handed down). But Paul also said, “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition [paradosis] of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ” (Colossians 2:8). The only traditions we are to keep are the inspired teachings that are handed down in the Scriptures, not man’s add-ons centuries later.

As to worship, Jesus said, “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24). The “truth” is God’s Word (John 17:17). Icons, incense, and rituals are nowhere commanded for the church. In Revelation, incense is symbolic of prayer (thumiama, Revelation 5: 8; 8:4), not a ritual act commanded for the church on earth. True incense today is “the sacrifice of praise… the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name” (Hebrews 13:15; Psalm 141:2).

As for salvation, scripture is clear: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works” (Ephesians 2:8–9). Philippians 2: 12–13 shows believers working out their salvation because God is already at work in them, not because their works contribute to salvation. James 2 teaches that true faith produces works, not that our works add to justification. Paul wrote clearly, “To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness” (Romans 4:5).

Finally, Paul’s warning in Galatians 1: 8 does apply here: “Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel… let him be accursed.” Rituals, traditions, and church authority added as necessary in addition to the gospel is exactly the kind of “another gospel” he was talking about. The pure gospel is Christ crucified and risen (1 Corinthians 15:3–4), received by faith alone. That is enough.

1 Like
41

Galatians 1: 8–9 doesn’t just curse Arianism or one false doctrine. Paul said, “Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” That can include anything added to or taken away from the gospel he preached to them. The Greek word for “any other” is heteros, which means “different, of another kind.” If a system binds man’s traditions or rituals for salvation or worship, that is a “different gospel.”

Paul said what gospel he preached was in 1 Corinthians 15: 3–4, “That Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.” Salvation is by faith in that finished work alone (Ephesians 2:8–9; Romans 4:5). Anything added to this is precisely what Galatians is condemning.

The church is not the custodian of truth above Scripture—Scripture itself is the truth (John 17: 17) and it makes the man of God complete (2 Timothy 3:16–17). Binding believers to traditions Christ never gave them is not stewardship of His Word but an addition to it, and Proverbs 30: 6 says, “Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.”

By setting man’s words and traditions against God’s truth, you are not guarding the gospel but corrupting it. Jesus said, “In vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” ( Matthew 15:9 ). He also warned, “Enter ye in at the strait gate… because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it” ( Matthew 7:13–14 ). To elevate human authority beside or above God’s Word is to walk the broad road that leads to destruction. Only Christ and His Word save. “Thy word is truth” ( John 17:17 ).

1 Like