Is God in Everything—or Distinct from It All? A Christian Response to Pantheism

Is God in Everything—or Distinct from It All? A Christian Response to Pantheism

As Christians reflect on the nature of God and creation, we invite your voice in Crosswalk Forums.
#PantheismDebate #BiblicalWorldview #christianforums #crosswalkforums #forums #crosswalk #faithcommunity #faithforums

Pantheism is the belief that everything is divine—that God is not separate from the universe but one and the same with it. Trees, rivers, stars, and even you and I are all said to be “God,” according to this worldview. It’s a seductive idea, especially in a culture fascinated by mindfulness, cosmic energy, and spirituality without accountability.

But Scripture presents a radically different vision. God created the universe—He is not in it as a force, but above it as Lord. While the heavens declare His glory, they are not divine themselves. Romans 1 warns of those who “exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.”

Pantheism often leads to erasing moral boundaries. If everything is divine, then nothing can truly be evil. If all is one, then sin is just illusion. But Christianity insists that God is holy, personal, and separate from creation—yet lovingly engaged with it.

So how do we respond when people say, “God is the universe” or “We’re all divine”? Is this just poetic language—or a dangerous distortion of truth?

What do you say when friends adopt spiritual-but-not-religious ideas that echo pantheism?
Is there room for mystery without falling into error?

“God is not nature. He made it. And He is not you. But He loves you.”

Explore this biblical perspective here:

From my recent encounter with Mac, i’m surprised to see that Pantheism hasn’t left us.
Let’s talk about its roots:
Pantheism comes from the greek pan (all) and theos (god) posits that omnia sunt deus (everything is god), the universe, nature and even human beings (Mac said about “human beings”)
Scriptural and Theological Idea
Christianity, grounded in ex nihilo (out of nothing) creation, asserts that God is extra mundum (outside the world) not identical with it. Gen 1:1 establishes God as the causa prima (first cause) distinct from His creation:
“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.”
The universe is not divine but a creation that reflects God’s glory, as Psalm 19:1 declares
“The heavens declare the glory of God”
Romans 1:25, as noted condemns the pantheistic error of worshipping creation, instead of the creator, labelling it a lie that distorts God’s truth.
Pantheism’s collapse of distinction undermines judgement and sin. If all is divine, moral boundaries dissolve, evil becomes a mere illusion, and righteousness loses meaning.
Christianity, however, affirms God’s holiness. His personal being and His fellowship with creation, without conflation.
The Incarnation of Christ further reveals God’s engagement with creation while maintaing His alteritas (otherness)
John 1:14 states “The Word became flesh” not “the Word became the universe”.
I do have friends which believe in pantheism, and I have warned them, many left this cult, and I have also debated in youtube comments and other forums about this, what I know is that many of them hunger for connection, or they have a reaction against rigid religiosity. I feel sad thinking about those lost, I want to bring others back too.
What i followed was:

  1. Affirm their longing but clarify their error:
    Acknowledge the beauty of their intuition, nature grandeur or human dignity can indeed point to God, but gently correct the conflation like “I see why you would say the universe feels divine, But what if the universe is more like a masterpiece that points to an artist but not the artist himself?”
    By asking such, you can trouble their conscience, and take them to a deeper level.
  2. Point to Personhood
    Pantheism often depersonalizes divinity, reducing God to an impersonal force. Highlight the Christian view of God as person who loves, speaks and redeems
    You can ask:
    “If we are all divine, why do we feel guilt of long for forgiveness? Could that point to a personal God who cares about us?”
  3. Address Moral Implications:
    Pantheism’s dissolution of sin can lead to moral relativism.
    Follow up with “If everything is divine, how do we judge right from wrong? Doesn’t evil feel too real to be an illusion?”
    Next, point to Christ’s self-emptying on the cross as evidence of a God who confronts evil, not ignores it.
  4. Embrace Mystery, Avoid Error:
    There is room for mystery in Christianity, like God’s essence is incomprehensible. But mystery doesnt mean vagueness. The apophatic tradition like Pseudo-Dionysius, affirms that God’s transcendence without collapsing Him into creation. Encourage friends to explore this balance: “God’s bigger than we can grasp, but He’s revealed enough to know He’s not the trees or us. He’s the one who made them and loves us.”

And yes, this helps us to counter pantheism and save others from this terrible deception.
I pray for them.
Remember, gentleness is the key.

Yes, @Samuel_23, I like some things about the popular nine Star Wars films, but its pantheism is not one of them. Even Christians have failed to discern the pervasive pantheism in those movies. The first one that was made defines The Force as directly pantheistic.

However, a strong theme in those movies, as in a lot of movies, is the plot that weak good overcomes strong evil, a very biblical theme. I can praise God for that idea while replacing The Force with the Triune God, as I watch the movies.

2 Likes

Ah yes, the soft-sounding poison of pantheism—the spiritual version of sugar-coated cyanide. “God is the universe”? Cute. So is a golden calf, until fire falls from heaven and Moses starts smashing tablets.

Let’s get this straight: the biblical God is not in the trees, as the trees. He spoke the trees into existence. That’s not mystery, that’s majesty. Genesis 1 isn’t poetry about divine diffusion—it’s a cosmic coronation. “In the beginning, God created…” means He existed before creation, outside of it, not diluted into it like some celestial seasoning.

Pantheism is the religion of the serpent dressed in yoga pants. “You will be like God,” he hissed in Genesis 3. And the modern echo? “You are God.” Same lie, different branding. But here’s the holy clapback: “I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me” (Isaiah 46:9). So unless you’re parting seas and sustaining galaxies with your Word, sit down.

Saying “everything is divine” is just a sophisticated way of rejecting a holy God who commands repentance. If God is everything, then sin is nothing—and suddenly, no one needs saving. Convenient. Heretical, but convenient.

Look, there’s room for mystery in the Christian faith. But mystery bows before majesty. It doesn’t erase the line between the Creator and the creation. Romans 1 doesn’t leave us guessing—it rebukes those who blur that line. Worshiping creation instead of the Creator isn’t spirituality. It’s idolatry with incense.

So no, God is not the breeze, the blade of grass, or your inner light. He’s the burning fire before whom Moses took off his sandals. He’s the sovereign King who upholds the universe by His Word—not by being absorbed into it like some divine mist. He is distinct. He is holy. And He is not you.

Which begs the real question: If your “spirituality” leaves you without awe, repentance, or the fear of the Lord—are you worshiping God, or just a flattering image of yourself?

—Sincere Seeker. Scripturally savage. Here for the Truth.

@SincereSeeker
When we face them, we need 4 parts.
1st Part:
Ontological Superiority, that God as Ens Per se (Being Itself)
Pantheism’s core claim is omnia sunt deus (everything is god), collapses the distinction between the divine and the world, positing a monistic identity, where God is the totality of existence. This view, was exemplified in one of the books i read, that was Spinoza’s Deus sive Natura (God or Nature) or Advaita Vedanta’s non-dualism, equates divinity with nature, denying any otherness. Christianity by contrast affirms God as being itself, whose self-existence grounds all contingent reality through creation out of nothing. Genesis 1:1 and Exodus 3:14 establish God as causa prima (first cause), distinct from creation, yet sovereign over it.
Critique:
Monism fails to account for the contingency of the universe. If the world is divine, why does it exhibit change, finitude or entropy?
Pantheism cannot explain the principle of individuation, as it reduces all to a single substance. This leads to an ontological flattening where distinctions between entities, essential for agency or plurality, are incoherent.
Leibniz asked a legendary question:
*“Why is there something rather than nothing?”
This exposes pantheism’s inability to ground existence without a transcendent principle.
But..
Christian theology posits God as a pure act, per Aquinas, whose essence and existence are identical, unlike the universe’s contingent being. The doctrine of analogy of being allows creation to reflect God’s glory without being divine, preserving both transcendence and immanence.
Debate point: Challenge the person that “If the universe is God, why is it marked by contingency and decay? Doesn’t this require a necessary being distinct from the world to explain its existence?
Part 2:
Ethical Coherence:
Pantheism’s monistic framework undermines moral categories. If omina sunt deus (everything is god), distinctions between good and evil dissolve into a unified oneness. Evil becomes a mere shadow or illusion as in some Eastern Pantheisms, negating the reality of sin.
Christianity however, grounds ethics in God’s holiness and personhood.
Romans 1:18-25 condemns the pantheistic error of worshipping creation over the Creator, linking it to moral rebellion and unrighteousness.
Critique:
Without a transcendent law, pantheism cannot ground objective morality. if all is divine, what basis exists for judgment or moral responsibility? Some who have researched abt this might appeal to pantheism’s ethical intuitionism like some said to me about “Stoic logos spermatikos (seed of reason)”, but we have to be prepared to counter even this. Because while the name seems academic, inside, its shallow. This idea about Stoic logos spermatikos lacks a personal end to adjudicate conflicts. Human experiences of guilt or justice presuppose a relational character, which pantheism’s impersonal divinity cannot sustain.
But..
The Gospel presents God as just and merciful, whose love confronts sin through Christ’s self-emptying on the Cross (Philippians 2:7).
This offers a coherent salvation, where moral evil is real but redeemable, unlike pantheism’s dissolution of ethical categories.
Debate point:
You can ask “If evil is illusory, how does pantheism account for moral guilt or demand for justice? Doesn’t Christianity’s personal God, who judges and redeems, better align with our ethical intuitions?”
3rd Part:
Epistemological Rigour: Reason and Revelation
Pantheism struggles to ground knowledge. If all is one, how does the knower transcend the world to understand it? Monism collapses the subject-object distinction, rendering self-consciousness or thought inexplicable. The roots of Christian knowledge is the divine Word, who is both transcendent and immanent (John 1:1-14). God’s revelation in Scripture and Christ provides a criterion of truth, unlike pantheism’s reliance on intuitive knowledge.
Critique:
Pantheism’s epistemological vagueness, seen in Plontinus’s emanatio, fails to explain why reason exists or how it discerns truth. If the self is divine, why is human knowledge limited of fallible? Pantheism lacks a principle of knowing to ground epistemology.
But..
The Word, incarnate bridges the epistemological gap, offering both cataphatic revelation and apophatic mystery. This balances mystery with clarity, providing a robust framework.
Debate point:
Press the person on “How does pantheism explain the capacity for rational distinction? Doesn’t Christianity’s Logos offer a stronger foundation for epistemology?”
4th Part:
Existential Depth: Theosis vs Henosis (Divinization vs Absoption)
Pantheism’s existential appeal lies in its promise of unity, offering a sense of cosmic belonging without fear of judgement. A prepared person might argue that it avoids Christianity’s dualistic Creation-creation divide. Christianity counters with the Trinity, three persons, one substance, which models unity-in-diversity, preserving distinction while enabling fellowship. The end goal of theosis promises union with God without loss of individuality (2 Peter 1:4)
Critique:
Pantheism’s unity absorbs the self into an impersonal whole, negating personal free will and relational love. This flattens human purpose, reducing existence to a static monad. The Professor or Debaters might cite Hegel’s absolute spirit, this means they are desperate, you can add, that this lacks a personal telos (end)..over.
But..
Christianity’s theosis offers a dynamic relationship with a personal God, whose immanence through the Spirit and Christ’s incarnation ensures intimacy without conflation. The awe-inspiring mystery of God’s essence invites wonder while grounding purpose in love
Debate point:
Doesn’t pantheism’s absorption negate the value of personal identity? How can love or purpose exist without otherness?”

Hi,

John 1:1-4 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men. KJV

Made, not “in.”

Blessings

@Samuel_23, your breakdown of pantheism is strong. You’ve obviously done the work, and your grasp of the philosophical roots is solid. But let me offer a push in love.

You don’t need to sprinkle every paragraph with Latin for it to land with authority. Phrases like omnia sunt deus and causa prima might feel precise, but if most readers have to slow down to decode it, the clarity suffers. The truth of Scripture does not need to be dressed in academic robes to be powerful. It just needs to be clear.
(Translated: knock it off)

Paul preached to Greeks in Greek, Jews in Hebrew, and Romans in plain terms. Jesus taught crowds in stories they could follow. They didn’t use coded language to show they were deep. They trusted the Spirit to pierce hearts with plain truth.

If your goal is to sharpen minds and stir conviction, then make sure the words serve the truth, not distract from it. Otherwise you risk sounding lofty and losing the very people who most need what you’re saying.

God does not need a translator. He just needs a faithful witness.

—Sincere Seeker. Scripturally savage. Here for the Truth.

1 Like

@Samuel_23, I see you brought the theological sledgehammer, and I’m here for it. You broke pantheism down with surgical precision. Now let me lace it with some holy fire and street-level clarity.

Pantheism tries to blur the line between the Creator and creation, turning the divine into background noise. But Christianity draws a line in the sand. Genesis 1:1 doesn’t say “In the beginning, God became the universe.” It says He created it. Period. God is not a cosmic ingredient mixed into matter. He’s the Author writing the story, not a character lost in the plot.

You mentioned Spinoza and Advaita. These systems melt God into the universe like butter into hot soup. But that’s not transcendence. That’s theological laziness dressed up as mystery. If everything is divine, then nothing is. That’s not deep. That’s diluted.

And you’re right to ask the hard question. If the universe is God, why does it die? Why decay? Why injustice, entropy, and death? That’s not divine glory. That’s the fallout of sin. Pantheism can’t explain evil because it erases the category altogether. Everything becomes sacred, even depravity. But Romans 1 says when people worship creation, they don’t become enlightened. They become fools.

Pantheism flattens moral reality. If all is God, then sin is just a misunderstanding and evil is an illusion. But the cross doesn’t treat evil like an illusion. It crushes it with blood and justice. Christ didn’t die to redeem us from bad vibes. He died because sin is real and holy wrath is coming.

You brought the Logos, and rightly so. Pantheism collapses subject and object. You can’t reason clearly if everything is one indistinct blob. But John 1 declares the Logos is both with God and is God. Distinct, yet united. Christianity doesn’t just preserve rationality. It explains why we have it in the first place. God speaks, so we can understand.

And when it comes to the human heart, pantheism might sound comforting, but only because it lets you pretend you don’t need saving. It promises unity through erasure. Christianity offers union through redemption. Theosis doesn’t dissolve you. It exalts you through grace. You don’t vanish into the void. You walk with the living God, fully known and fully loved.

So yes, press the questions. Why does the world rot if it’s divine? Why does the human soul ache for justice and truth? Why does love even matter if selfhood is an illusion?

Only one worldview has a God who made the world, judges it rightly, enters it humbly, dies for it sacrificially, and will one day remake it in glory. And it’s not pantheism.

—Sincere Seeker. Scripturally savage. Here for the Truth.

Thanks @sincereseeker, noted.

1 Like

@sincereseeker, battle isn’t over. Here in the library, there is something unsettling.
Support pantheism, pantheists like:

  1. Green, Arthur. Seek My Face, Speak My Name: A Contemporary Jewish Theology.
    Arthur Green likes pantheism
  2. Michaelson, Jay. Everything Is God: The Radical Path of Nondual Judaism
    Based on kabbalistic texts like Zohar and Hasidic teaching, he says that the Shema means “all Being in one” supports pantheism.
  3. Kaplan, Mordecai. The Meaning of God in Modern Jewish Religion
    Views God as sum of all natural processes.
  4. Matt, Daniel C. The Essential Kabbalah: The Heart of Jewish Mysticism
    In it we see Moses Cordovero‘s Shi’ur Qomah which states “The essence of divinity is found in every single thing—nothing but it exists… all existence is God.”
  5. Zohar (attributed to Moses de Leon)
    Describes Ein Sof as the source of all existence, with creation as an emanation of divine essence.
    Christians as well:
  6. Tillich, Paul. Systematic Theology, Volume 1
    Tillich’s view that “God is not a being, but Being itself” resonates with pantheistic ideas
  7. Cobb, John B., Jr., and David Ray Griffin. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition (from Westminster press):
    Process theology, rooted in Alfred North Whitehead’s philosophy, posits a God who is immanent in the world’s processes, evolving with creation.
  8. Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. The Phenomenon of Man:
    Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit priest and paleontologist, presents a cosmic vision where creation evolves toward the Omega Point, a divine convergence of all things.
  9. Eriugena, John Scotus. Periphyseon (On the Division of Nature) (Translated by I.P. Sheldon-Williams)
    articulates a Neoplatonic Christian cosmology where God is the cause of all things and creation is a theophany.
  10. Moltmann, Jürgen. God in Creation: A New Theology of Creation and the Spirit of God:
    Jürgen Moltmann, a Reformed theologian, develops a panentheistic theology where God’s Holy Spirit indwells creation, emphasizing divine immanence.
  11. Hunt, John. Pantheism and the Philosophy of the Jews (Kessinger Publishing, 2005; excerpt from Pantheism and Christianity, 1884):
    Hunt argues that pantheistic concepts, such as the unity of all things and God’s presence in nature, have influenced Jewish thought, particularly in mystical and ethical traditions.
    My main aim was to tell, that even though we may not take it seriously, pantheism has crept into many works of literature and millions read it and accept it without knowing. This is a serious problem. To counter a a person who believes in pantheism, we should counter it within their domain.
    Peace
    Sam

Samuel_23, you’re absolutely right to sound the alarm. Pantheism has slipped in quietly, hiding under layers of mystical language and half-lit academic libraries. From the Zohar to Tillich to Teilhard, you’re naming the thinkers who turned transcendence into fog and traded the living God for a concept that blends too easily with the cosmos. And that’s not just bad theology. That’s spiritual erosion.

But here’s where we have to stay sharp. Citing a dozen sources that echo pantheism doesn’t validate it. It proves how far we’ve drifted from biblical clarity. The fact that millions read this stuff without discernment is exactly why we have to plant the flag on truth, not wander into their mist to meet them halfway. We confront falsehood with fire, not flattery.

You said we need to counter pantheists within their domain. I agree, but not by playing their game. We don’t need to sound mystical to refute mysticism. We need to sound like the prophets, like Christ, like Paul on Mars Hill. Speak plainly. Speak boldly. Call out the lies, not just their lineage.

If someone believes the Shema teaches nonduality, take them to Isaiah 45 where God declares there is no other. If they say all is divine, ask why evil exists. If they quote Moltmann’s panentheism, show them Colossians where Christ holds creation together but is not collapsed into it. This is not about academic ping pong. This is about souls.

You brought the receipts. Now bring the sword. Truth speaks with authority, not apology.

—Sincere Seeker. Scripturally savage. Here for the Truth.

Praise be to God, @SincereSeeker brother
Thanks for your guidance…but we have some who don’t accept scriptures, or part of scriptures like Paul’s letters etc, how should we go about in such cases?
Peace
Sam

@Samuel_23, ultimately, when we share the truth, it’s not longer our responsibility before God how people take it; it’s theirs. We need to keep sharing it no matter what (Ezekiel 33).

True @bruce_leiter, I see what you are saying…
Pantheism is like a silent issue, it has crept into many aspects of our life.
Peace
Sam

I love this topic. It is a beautiful thing to think of God, to attempt to understand the existence and mind of God. Better still to chase after the heart of God. But at the same time, from our limited perspective, we cannot graap all the Greatness. We cannot house within our selves the full scope.

It is human pride that says we can know these things fully and completely. Man can put God in a box and say this is God. But in its own way, is this any different from carving a statue and sayng that is God? We have only crafted it out of words rather than stone or wood.

Remember, Christ spoke in parables in an attempt to translate ideas beyond human comprehension. He did not lay out rule after rule, law after law, doctrine after doctrine. But instead He spoke to what already existed in human minds, with religion and law, and took us steps forward from there. In fact he challenged us to reach higher than what was previously believed to be enough.

Any cult leader can give you a doctrine, a belief, a definition of who or what God is. And then redirect your eyes back to the earth, and usually back on to themselves. They work with fear, hate, and destructive ways which usually catch up with them.

But Christ said He was the Way, the Truth, and the Life. He was not the end of the path but a doorway to be passed through that leads to the Father.

This seperates Him from cult leaders who live from a place of ego and feed upon their followers, leaders who are themselves the focus. Christ guides your eyes to the Father. He lights the path, revealing Truth, and being that Truth Manifested. He embodies the New Man, and shows us by example the lives we are called to live.

Because of this we know the difference between Wolves who feed themselves upon you, and Shepherds who guide you to safety when you don’t know the Way. The Shepherd lays down His life for you, that not one be lost. He faces the threats to keep His flock safe. He remains invested in our present struggles, in the outcomes, and in our future.

With that said, if You believe the Lord is your Shepherd, then you must trust God is still guiding us in all these things. And wrong turns will be met by a staff and rod over our lives, that we are constantly being pulled back and nudged forward. God does not leave investments unattended.

It should also be noted- if Love is the Law, and other people took a train rather than a plane to get there, maybe we can bring the Gospel into the conversation without fighting or wrestling with the groundwork God has already laid down in order to get them there.

Unless you believe false idols can teach manikind how to be thoughtful, kind, considerate, compassionate, to be self sacrificial, to search for God beyond themselves, to question the corruption of a sinful selfish world and pursue justice?

If God could make the stones praise Him, because no one else was around to praise Him (if praise was actually what God was looking for…) , couldn’t He also use a stone to save those people who did not know Him? Until He finally broke the stone apart in revelation, burning the bush, and saying, “I Am.” The bush was after all not God. But it was an instrument by which Moses could see that which no man could lay eyes upon.

Even the early church took the gods of Pagans conquered by Rome and turned them into “Saints” in order to make it easier for them to know Christ, who guides our focus to the Father. Even Paul spoke of the the temple or alter to an unknown God in a place of many Gods and used it to speak of Christ. And did he not say, I have become all things for all people. Didn’t he or am I mistaken? So the question becomes, would God use all things in Creation to point humaniity back to Himself?

How can God be both seperate and engaged? Maybe it is the same difference between Christ being both God and Man. Or Father and Son. A child cannot be born without being a part of the parent. This was the design of creation. And mankind was created in the image of God. And through Christ, God has merged with man- the blue print of the New Adam.

As the Holy Spirit joins with us when we recieve Christ into our lives, and we become a new Creation.

In this, there is some semblance of God being more internally woven someday into existence if this is not alteady the case.

When you look at objects deep enough with a microscope you will find there is no glue or gears that hold it all together. If God is not there, then please tell me what is in all of the empty space. What keeps everything from falling apart?

Faith? Belief? Doctine? Or God?

Again, I don’t focus on doctrines as much as parables. So I could be wrong. I am not about telling people what to believe. I mean, who am I to do that? But I know what I have wrestled with because I do spend time thinking upon God and trying to engage THAT, which I cannot begin to understand. I can only begin to attempt to follow and trust and know. And Love.

And God, who knows your future without Him, injected Himself into a single moment in time and space, multiple times, in order for you to be saved. A Being Who is unlimited by the dimensions that contain us, bore those parameters in order to intervine. To save us. To guide us home by giving us a Better Way Forward. Where as our old path lead us all to our death and doom, the death of all things, His Path leads us to Life. Life made New. New Chances. New Beginnings. A New Future. Because He first loved us. That is the Gospel. And we must live that Way Forward, allowing God to Transform us to prevent whatever dark fate was once before us so it will never come to pass.

Is that Doctrine? Is it Truth? Is it Inspired? I can’t tell you. I don’t know. But we are living as if all prophecies are meant to be. But God sometimes gives us a choice with that vision of what may come. He tells us of our choices so that we might choose different. And in Christ, we have the hearts that might choose better.

i wanted to add but ran out of room-

When we speak of an old creation and a new creation, we think in human terms rather than try to understand this from God’s perspective.

We think God will destroy this planet amd give us a new planet.

But God is not confined by space or time.

Is it possible that the old creation was the world that would have come to pass if Christ did not appear, if God did not intervine. And the New Creation is what will come to pass because Christ entered our lives.

The Path forward was forever changed by a God Who saw and sees all things and moved to save us when we could not save ourselves.

God will give believers his new universe, according to the Bible:

Isa 65:17 “For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth, and the former things shall not be remembered or come into mind.
Isa 65:18 But be glad and rejoice forever in that which I create; for behold, I create Jerusalem to be a joy, and her people to be a gladness.
Isa 65:19 I will rejoice in Jerusalem and be glad in my people; no more shall be heard in it the sound of weeping and the cry of distress.

Rev 21:1 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more.
Rev 21:2 And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Rev 21:3 And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.
Rev 21:4 He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.”
Rev 21:5 And he who was seated on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” Also he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.”