Pre_maritial sex is not sin according to the bible

Theology
1

Thesis: Modern church mandates requiring a formal wedding ceremony, pastoral permission, or state-issued marriage license to validate a relationship are entirely extra-biblical traditions of man. According to the strict text of the King James Bible, a committed, exclusive union between two single adults is recognized and sealed by God the moment the covenant of the heart is physically consummated.

1. Consensual Sex Between Single Adults is Omitted from God’s List of Sins

Leviticus 18 is the absolute master list where God explicitly bans every forbidden sexual act (adultery, incest, bestiality). Consensual intimacy between single, unmarried adults is completely missing. Furthermore, Exodus 22:16-17 treats intimacy between an unbetrothed couple strictly as a civil property/dowry matter—not a spiritual sin requiring a blood sacrifice or carrying spiritual condemnation.

2. The Original Context of “Fornication” (Porneia)

When the New Testament says “flee fornication” (1 Cor 6:18), the Greek word written was porneia. In the first-century biblical world, porneia explicitly denoted prostitution, incest, or pagan temple rituals. It was never textually applied to a loving, committed, exclusive couple.

3. Physical Intimacy IS the Scriptural Mechanic of Marriage

Traditional theology claims you need an altar, rings, and government paperwork before you can touch. The Bible says the exact opposite:

  • Genesis 24:67: “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife…” No buildings, no licenses, no pastors. The physical intimacy itself was the consummation of the covenant status.

  • 1 Corinthians 6:16: The text states that physical intimacy is the exact mechanism that creates the “one flesh” bond (“…for two, saith he, shall be one flesh”). The act itself executes the biblical mechanic of becoming spouses.

4. The Biblical Order: Union First, Celebration Second

Institutional churches argue a public ceremony must happen to “create” the marriage. But scriptural precedent shows public wedding feasts always happened after the couple was already physically intimate (e.g., Judges 14:10–11). The public party is a beautiful human tradition, but it does not establish the spiritual covenant.

5. Institutional Overreach

By inventing a sin where the text is silent and demanding compliance with modern legal/bureaucratic structures, modern churches violate Proverbs 30:6 (“Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar”) and fall directly under Christ’s rebuke in Mark 7:7: “Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”

Debate: If God is the primary witness of a covenant (Malachi 2:14), by what scriptural authority does an institution claim the power to turn what God left textually clean into a spiritual transgression based on modern bureaucratic paperwork?

2

The first wedding involved Adam and Even and God. Institutional involvement is not necessary. However, pre-marital sex is potentially destructive. If someone decides to move on after a physical relationship, whatever diseases, children, and emotional carnage left behind might not matter to them.

Chastity until marriage is a way to insure that as two people discover the physical aspect of their relationship, often with patience and even humor, they build a special intimacy that can last a lifetime.

2 Likes
3

Welcome to the forum.

There is a big difference between the customs and legal requirements found in Christian church marriage ceremonies and the at times far more informal early biblical marriage arrangements and the equally elaborate biblical marriage ceremonies.

These are all far removed from the modern custom of co habiting and certainly has no relationship to the modern habit of ’ hooking up '.

Yes a couple who co habit may consider themselves to be married in the eyes of God and in the eyes of society, this does nothing to give the ’ wife ’ any legal protection in the event of being abandon or in the event of the ’ husbands ’ death.

May I suggest you research the stats on living together versis marriage and try this link:-

1 Like
4

Commentary on and clips from Kenneth Copeland, Joel Osteen, Taylor Swift, John MacArthur, Voddie Baucham, Bill Johnson, Bethel Church, Jesse Duplantis, Zakir Naik, Brandan Robertson, Sunny Hostin, TD Jakes, Oprah Winfrey, Steven Furtick, Andy Stanley, Jimmy Fallon, Huffington Post, Marc Lamont Hill, Joyce Meyer, Charlie Kirk, Benny Hinn, Ray Comfort, Living Waters, Piers Morgan, Mike Todd, Transformation Church, Lakewood Church, Joseph Prince, Stephen Colbert, Sid Roth, Turning Point USA, Joy Behar, The View, Dylan Mulvaney, Joe Biden, Ana Kasparian, The Young Turks, Richard Dawkins, Lil Nas X, and Grace Family Baptist Church.

J

2 Likes
5

@anon21586045 You make fair points! But, I do agree with @Who-me. If you’re using the argument that two consenting adults are all you need in God’s eyes, then by that logic, there are a lot of 25-year-olds who have at least 32 husbands/wives right now. :smirking_face: I would not use the Bible to excuse casual sex. BUT, I do see a fair argument for adults who live together and never get legally married.

1 Like
6

"Pre_maritial sex is not sin according to the bible. " Not really sure of your point. Leviticus 18 isn’t actually meant to be an exhaustive “sexual ethics manual” for the modern individual. It is specifically a list of boundary violations that would destroy the clan or family structure, or mimic pagan Egyptian and Canaanite religious rituals.

Incest destroyed the strict family hierarchies required for survival in tribal societies. Adultery violated another man’s household and disrupted legal inheritance lines. Bestiality and cultic practices violated the distinction between humanity, animals, and God. The text assumes that sexual intimacy belongs within a family structure. It explicitly lists the violations of that structure rather than defining everyday relationships.

You are completely right: Exodus 22 treats consensual sex between an unbetrothed, unmarried couple as a civil issue involving a dowry, not a capital offense requiring execution.

“If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride-price for her and make her his wife.” Exodus 22:16

In the ancient mind, sex was the physical initiation of a covenant. If two unmarried people had consensual sex, the law didn’t require a sacrificial ritual to clean a spiritual stain; instead, the law required them to formalize the reality of what they just did by paying the bride-price and marrying.

In other words, the ancient Israelites didn’t have a category for “consensual, casual dating between independent singles.” A woman was part of her father’s household until she became part of her husband’s household. Therefore, bypassing the covenant process was treated as a severe civil offense against the family’s honor and economic structure.

While Leviticus 18 doesn’t use the modern phrase “premarital sex,” the rest of Scripture views intimacy outside of the marriage covenant as a violation of God’s design. The Old Testament uses the word zanah (often translated as harlotry or whoredom) to describe sexual behavior outside the boundaries of a committed marriage covenant. It is consistently condemned as a corrupting force (see Proverbs 5 and 6).

By the time the New Testament was written, the Greek word porneia was used as an umbrella term for any sexual activity outside of a legal marriage covenant. When Paul tells believers to “flee from sexual immorality (porneia)” in 1 Corinthians 6:18, 1st-century readers instantly understood that to include intimacy between unmarried singles.

Peter

2 Likes
7

Great video. Not sure what it had to do with the topic. But GREAT video. I encourage all to check it out.
Peter

2 Likes
8

Voddie is addressing the topic under discussion brother.

Johann.

9

Using the meaning of the Greek porneia as defined within the Bible, @anon21586045, it means any sex outside of marriage as follows:

Lexical Summary porneia: immorality, fornication, fornications

Original Word: πορνεία
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: porneia
Pronunciation: por-NAY-ah
Phonetic Spelling: (por-ni’-ah)
KJV: fornication
NASB: immorality, fornication, fornications, immoralities, sexual immorality, unchastity
Word Origin: [from G4203 (πορνεύω - committed immorality)]

  1. prostitution (including adultery, incest, and porn)
  2. (by extension) unwedded stimulation or fulfillment of sexual desire
  3. (figuratively) idolatry

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance

fornication.

From porneuo; harlotry (including adultery and incest); figuratively, idolatry – fornication.

see GREEK porneuo

HELPS Word-studies

4202 porneía (the root of the English terms “pornography, pornographic”; cf. 4205 /pórnos) which is derived from pernaō, “to sell off”) – properly, a selling off (surrendering) of sexual purity; promiscuity of any (every) type.

1 Like
10
11

I appreciate all the comments and feedback on my findings and indulge in discussing various view points of this, but do keep in mind that the reason this book and scriptures exists is due to several different viewpoints and beliefs. 1947 discovery of the Dead sea scrolls proved that these scriptures and texts are all human based concepts and understanding of the cultural beliefs at that time. Different viewpoints and beliefs are evident in different translations of the oldest texts found used for translations. Ultimately my point being made is valid as validity of these concepts, not morality, are up for debate depending on the person’s own beliefs, what are considered sins and what is not sins all depends on what the powers at play in those times saw as destructive and not destructive, what was the law of the land and what was dismiss able.

12

@anon21586045, please be specific to give an example of how the Dead Sea Scrolls show that the sin of sexual immorality and adultery are not really sinful. General statements are one thing, but I prefer to discuss specific passages in the Bible, including those scrolls.

It also seems to me that your comments reflect the belief that the Scriptures we have are not God-inspired. Is that right? If so, why do you think so? Let’s have a discussion.

1 Like
13

All that of course is an attempt at falsely supporting fornication. Fornication is about sexual relations outside the marriage, period. It does not have to be tied to sexual fertility rituals, etc., to be fornication.

And for a Christian to promote such an attitude that fornication is acceptable to God is an abomination.

14

Whoa! Hey, do you believe this guy? In one of those weird moods today. Sorry. But uh, what? What was sin is sin. There is not a case whatsoever of something coming along, Dead Sea Scrolls or anything else, that contradicts scripture to the point that we need to ignore scripture. That is a dangerous statement that I hope you brought a receipt for.
Peter

2 Likes
15

What is the scripture ultimately if it can be translated, rewritten, re-rewritten, translated again and changed? It is a man made concept of what they believe or how they perceive what god ultimately is. Several of the old texts found has been changed and translated (Some words and sentences changed to such extent that the meaning completely changed), Inconsistency is seen in several places, in the same books and between different authors speaking of the same story. I do believe the bible does hold some good guidelines and then again some completely immoral points and to argue that it was for those times, because of how their laws and etc etc was, points more to it not then being relevant to today’s age. Maybe a sequel to the bible then?

16

I was not implying that the Dead Sea Scrolls hold any examples or verses that shows it is not sinful, in fact it is even more strict on the it. The discovery of these scrolls brought forth a polytheistic view that was believed by earlier cultures (fragment 4QDeutʲ. Deuteronomy 32:8–9 in later translations was changed to children of Israel. Changes like these are not translation error but intended changes to shift belief from one thing to another. If this was possible how can anything in any of these scriptures be deemed valid? So would you say they are God-inspired or a human made construct and if it is determined by humans what is to be written there then how can it be validated that anything is a sin for example fornication or sexual immorality and not only a matter of economic property right violation, tribal survival or bloodline purity. Being sent to eternal punishment because you and your devoted life long partner did not marry? Hmmm, I am eager for your reply on this one as it is a interesting one.

17

Looks like you have a problem with the Scriptures, somehow, it is not God-breathed. Do you believe Messiah Yeshua was crucified and resurrected?

J.

1 Like
18

If you had the look at the contradicting manner Yeshua preached in reflection of what the old testament laws were, one would theorize that Yeshua was preaching of another father and not Yahweh. This tale is just a sad one and also one I like to discuss, so you believe that God created earth, created humans, knew that we were going to sin and then one day would have to offer up his child, continued anyway with making everything and letting it happen, created a hell and then got mad that we sinned, and had to get a blood offering (His own son) to forgive us for the sins he was ultimately responsible for? Would you make a fire in a baby’s play pen and if the baby burns himself hold the baby responsible even though you put the fire there in the first place?

19

What group are you affiliated with? Since you reject the fundamental orthodox core doctrines as written in Scriptures?

J.

20

I am not affiliated with any group. I simply do my own research. These are actually scripture based verses I can relate to when the author wrote them: Deuteronomy 13:14 – When dealing with rumors of false worship or false prophets, the text commands: “Then you shall inquire and search and ask diligently.”

Proverbs 18:17 – A warning against accepting the first explanation you hear: “The first to state his case seems right, until his opponent comes and cross-examines him.” This heavily promotes critical thinking and looking at multiple perspectives before deciding what is true.

So as to my point his book does hold some sort of truth to it but not all as I see it as a human made construct and not a divine broadcast, so the verses above was merely referenced as I would reference something out of a high school science book.