Sanctification - what is it?

A “gradual growth in holiness” is perhaps the best description of the options given; sanctification isn’t separate from salvation, and it most certainly isn’t the ability to live a sinless life.

Rather than “a gradual growth in holiness” I would say sanctification is best understood as the process by which the Holy Spirit is conforming us to the image of Christ, it is an ongoing work, a continuing work, that involves our cooperation with God. Where in our justification we are entirely passive; sanctification is a cooperative, synergistic ongoing life of faithful discipleship.

We should not imagine sanctification as some kind of ladder we climb, where each rung on the ladder achieves us some greater degree of personal glory–as though we ascend toward God, or that there are milestones we attain, or ranks we achieve. Sanctification is the ongoing, continuing work of the Spirit in our lives, calling and inviting us to lay ourselves down, to drown the old man in repentance, feeding the new man and walking in lives of faithful discipleship and obedience–and that is always effort, it is hard work to follow Jesus. Taking up our cross is not easy, but difficult–indeed impossible apart from the Holy Spirit alive and working in us, making us new.

Sanctification never means we can look at our brothers and sisters and think we are more holy than them; sanctification always means humility before the foot of the Cross, confessing our unworthiness, and the daily, continuing invitation to come and follow, to deny ourselves, take up our cross and follow Jesus.

You will stumble, you will falter, you will fail spectacularly–but Christ is with you, and you are in Him, so hold strong, cleave to Him in all things. He will lift you up, go and follow, love your neighbor as yourself, and die to the world.

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but it ain’t theosis, right?

Yes and no. Theosis and Sanctification, if nothing else, are interconnected and inseparable concepts.

It’s a benediction and an invitation. Given the mercy she has encountered in Jesus, she is invited–and blessed–to go and discover a new life, one that is no longer defined by her previous sinful way of life. It’s not about attaining a state of sinlessness; but an invitation to a new redeemed life of faithfulness.

I have a slight problem with this @TheologyNerd

Let’s break this down-

κοινωνοί (koinōnoi) – “Partakers, sharers, companions.”

This word does not imply fusion with God’s essence but rather participation in His attributes. Would you agree?

Used elsewhere in Scripture to denote fellowship (1 Corinthians 10:16 – “partakers of the body and blood of Christ”).

θείας (theias) – “Divine, pertaining to God.”

This adjective does not refer to God’s essence (οὐσία, ousia) but rather His qualities.

Found in Acts 17:29 – “Being then God’s offspring, we ought not to think that the divine nature (το θεῖον, to theion) is like gold or silver.”

φύσεως (physeōs) – “Nature, inherent constitution.”

This term does not mean essence-sharing but rather participation in God’s moral and spiritual attributes. Are we still in agreement brother?

Used in Romans 2:14 – “Gentiles who do not have the law do by nature (φύσει, physei) what the law requires.”

  1. Biblical Context: Participation vs. Essence-Sharing

2 Peter 1:4 – “That you may become partakers of the divine nature.”

The verb γένησθε (genēsthe) means “to become, to be born into, to change condition.”

This does not imply ontological union but rather moral transformation through sanctification.That by these you might be partakers of the divine nature; not essentially, or of the essence of God, so as to be deified, this is impossible, for the nature, perfections, and glory of God, are incommunicable to creatures; nor, hypostatically and personally, so as the human nature of Christ, in union with the Son of God, is a partaker of the divine nature in him; but by way of resemblance and likeness, the new man or principle of grace, being formed in the heart in regeneration, after the image of God, and bearing a likeness to the image of his Son, and this is styled, Christ formed in the heart, into which image and likeness the saints are more and more changed, from glory to glory, through the application of the Gospel, and the promises of it, by which they have such sights of Christ as do transform them, and assimilate them to him; and which resemblance will be perfected hereafter, when they shall be entirely like him, and see him as he is:
Gill

Hebrews 12:10 – “That we may share in His holiness.”

The Greek μεταλαμβάνειν (metalambanein) means “to partake, to receive a portion.”

This reinforces participation in God’s holiness, not essence-sharing.

That we might be partakers of his holiness; not the essential holiness of God, which is incommunicable; but a communicative holiness of his, which it is his determining will his people should have: it comes from him, from whom every good and perfect gift does; it is in Christ for them, and is received out of his fulness; and is wrought in them by the Spirit; and it bears a resemblance to the divine nature: now men are naturally destitute of this holiness; they have it not by nature, but by participation; as God’s gift; and they first partake of it in regeneration; and here an increase of it is designed, a gradual participation of it; and it may include perfect holiness in heaven: afflictions are designed as means to bring persons to this end; to bring them to a sense of sin, an acknowledgment of it, an aversion to it, and to a view of pardon of it; to purge it away; to wean the saints from this world; to increase their grace, and lead them on to a perfect state of glory, where there will be no more sin, and no more sorrow.

Gill.

  1. Early Church Fathers (Pre-Augustine) on Participation in God

Athanasius (Against the Arians 3.24) – “The essence of God is beyond all created things.”

Basil the Great (Letter 234) – “We know our God from His energies, but we do not claim to approach His essence.”

Gregory of Nyssa (Life of Moses 2.163) – “The divine nature is incomprehensible and beyond all human grasp.”

Final Thought

The Greek verbs and biblical context confirm that κοινωνοί θείας φύσεως refers to participation in God’s attributes, not fusion with His essence. The Early Church Fathers reinforce this distinction, affirming that believers reflect God’s holiness but do not become divine in substance.

Let me know your thoughts on this.

Johann.

This word does not imply fusion with God’s essence but rather participation in His attributes. Would you agree?

Of course I’d agree.

I’d also point out that Theosis does not mean “fusion with God’s essence”. God’s essence is God’s essence, and is the unique and ineffible Being communicated exclusively within the Three Divine Persons–the Father communicates His essence with/to the Son, the Son is eternally begotten of the Father as God of God; the Father communicates His essence with/to the Spirit, the Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father [and the Son]; one God, Three Persons. Our participation in God does not mean we become God in His uncreated and eternal essence. It means we participate in God by grace, it is koinonia, not homoousia.

Just wanted to check, brother-many denominations push the “we are gods” narrative, but I’m glad we’re in agreement on this.

J.

As far as I know, no Christian denomination teaches “we are gods” or that we become gods. The only group that calls itself “Christian” that suggests something like that (that I am aware of off the top of my head) is Mormonism, but I’d hardly call Mormonism a denomination of Christianity.

Where have you been lately?!

In recent theological discourse, significant attention has been given to the doctrinal claims made by various figures within the Word of Faith movement, including Joyce Meyer and Kenneth Copeland. Their assertions regarding human divinity, often encapsulated in the “we are gods” narrative, have sparked critical examination within apologetic debates.

This perspective appears to conflate divine authority with human nature in a manner that challenges traditional theological distinctions. Given the historical and exegetical foundations of Christian doctrine, such interpretations warrant careful scrutiny, as they risk distorting the ontological relationship between humanity and the divine.

Blessings.

J.

1 Like

Ah, the Word of Faith/New Apostolic Reformation stuff did escape me when I wrote what I wrote. But you are right, that stuff does exist within those circles.

The whole lot of it is a toxic banquet of heresy and charlatanism.

I fully concur, we are in the last days.

Stay strong in Messiah.

J.

Is that what it says, or what you want it to say?

I just like arguing the other side, so don’t take this personal.

" Go, and sin no more" sounds like a command.

Just as, “Be Holy” or “Walk before me blameless”

What’s the context? Is Jesus, after causing the mob to lay down their stones by pointing out their own sinful hypocrisy, and showing mercy to the woman, now telling her, “Now, don’t sin or else”? If the “go and sin no more” is about becoming literally impeccable, then this is not a word of mercy to her, but a word of condemnation–if she cannot become impeccable then what?

But in the context she has been set free from the cruelty of the hypocritical mob, Jesus declares mercy to her, and then sends her on her way–to “go and sin no more”. In the narrowest sense it is a call for her to recognize the mercy she has just received and to no longer live in the sin (adultery) she had been living in. That is not a harsh command, but a loving call and invitation.

The context matters here.

In the larger scope of biblical teaching we can know that impeccability is never supported, because Scripture presumes that God’s people need to repent, to confess their sin, to abide in Christ. St. John writes, “If we say we have no sin, then the truth is not in us”, that’s a statement for us, for Christians; as is the following statement, “But if we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:8-9).

Christians do not deny that we are sinners, but instead confess that we are sinners–we make bold our confession, trusting in God’s grace, in the forgiveness that God freely and graciously gives us in Christ.

“Go and sin no more” is not, and cannot, mean “If you try hard enough, you can attain your own righteousness”; it cannot mean “watch out, if you screw up again, God is going to get you”. Christ preaches mercy to the woman, He gives her freedom–the freedom to experience a new life, no longer enslaved to the life of adultery she was living in, but a call to live in the new-found freedom and mercy she has received.

And that becomes a blessing to us all, who in our sin come face-to-face with the harshness of the Law, which justly condemns us. We do not need a mob of hypocritical sinners to threaten us; the Law itself is just and holy and condemns us all in our sin. The Law cannot make us righteous; only grace can free us to a life no longer defined by our sin.

“Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men-bedders, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” - 1 Corinthians 6:9-11

Does this mean none of the Corinthians ever sinned? Of course they did, otherwise Paul’s epistle to them almost makes no sense,

“But you yourselves wrong and defraud—even your own brothers!” (1 Corinthians 6:8), that’s the verse immediately preceding the above.

The Apostle is speaking of the past lives of the Corinthians, but they have a new life in Christ–and it is precisely that new life in Christ that they should aspire for, and thus the wrong they do–their sin–is even more unacceptable. Why are they sinning when they have been freed from sin?

That’s what Paul gets on about in Romans 6 as well, after having said, “Should we go on sinning so that grace may abound? Heavens no!” he follows it up by reminding the Romans of their baptism, they have died with Christ, buried with Christ, they have a new life in Christ–for the one who has died has died to sin, so why go on sinning? Instead we are to think of ourselves as dead to sin and alive to God.

It is never impeccability that is being preached, but rather genuine condemnation of sin, the use of the Law to both reveal our sin and to call us to repentance and change our way of life; and the preaching of the Gospel to declare that we are forgiven, there is mercy, grace sets us free.

So “Go and sin no more” is not an expectation of impeccability; it is a call and invitation to new life, “Where are your accusers?” “Sir, they are gone” “Neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more” That’s a benediction, a sending forth with blessing, in mercy, and invitation to live differently than before.

1 Like

As a matter of fact @TheologyNerd

I see salvation as one who you are connected to.

Here’s a way I imagine it to be:

God being the beginning and end - His Story

I would like to say we are the people of the book, the book of life, even; only if we stay attached to the one that is in the beginning and the end.

So this posses a question :thinking: for me. Like what does it mean: they that endure to the end shall be saved?

I hear that scripture in OSAS arguments but probably should take the time to look up the context.

Regardless though, by your own inference on the the command to, “Go, and sin no more” being and invitation, couldn’t we also apply it to the above: " “Those that endure to the end shall be saved” and " Walk before me blameless" If not why?

Isn’t it interesting,
“When Abram was ninety-nine years old the LORD appeared to Abram and said to him, “I am God Almighty; walk before me, and be blameless, that I may make my covenant between me and you, and may multiply you greatly.” Then Abram fell on his face.”

It actually would have to beg the question if being blameless had anything to do with sin in and unward motion. Rather being blameless was about who He was looking to and trusting…And Even if you say the woman who was forgiven was given an invitation, He never said that she could not be sinless at some point. So was the way to sinlessness about her trying to stop sinning or that forgiveness gave her the power to stop sinning. ( new outlook, i get it)

But I can’t say as I am contemplating this outloud I can’t see your point. I actually do even more.

Thank you good word

What it sounds is that God has the ability to make us stand where we are weak. Sound like all we have to do is move in the right direction…??? Repent ?

I feel so much free …from @Johann giving a passage on Justification…and this..wondering what strain a gnat means..just came to me..peace and blessing!!! :blush:

Looked it up…interesting ..

@Corlove13

Justification and sanctification run deep. I’m still finding my place in this forum, exploring where I truly belong.

The phrase “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel” appears in Matthew 23:24, where Jesus criticizes the Pharisees for their hypocrisy. The Pharisees were religious leaders who meticulously followed minor rules-such as filtering out tiny impurities like gnats from their drinks to maintain ritual purity—while ignoring much larger moral responsibilities, symbolized by the camel1.

This rebuke is part of a broader passage in which Jesus condemns them for focusing on external appearances rather than true righteousness. He points out that they obsess over small religious details, like tithing herbs, but neglect justice, mercy, and faithfulness. The imagery of straining out a gnat while swallowing a camel emphasizes the absurdity of their misplaced priorities3.

In modern usage, the phrase serves as a warning against nitpicking minor issues while overlooking major faults. It reminds us to focus on what truly matters rather than getting lost in trivial concerns.

J.

1 Like

I suppose my question would be, how would one reconcile the idea of Christian impeccability with 1 John 1:8.

There are, of course, many theological concerns I have with the notion of impeccability. But at the moment I would focus on 1 John 1:8.

Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him

1Jn 1:5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
1Jn 1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:
1Jn 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
1Jn 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1Jn 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

J.

I’m reading this thread with interest and wonder. Let me pound in a small tent peg.
The word our English Bibles use “Sanctification” is Latin in origin, and means “set aside or prepared for holy use”. (@Johann can speak on this with much more authority), The original word is a derivitave of the word for Holy, and means “made holy”. Christian tradition seems to favor the Latin meaning, that can imply a lengthy process. The original hearers may have heard something much more instantaneous. I’m wondering, from The word, where we derive the meaning of process from the specific context in which the original word is used. @Johann? Ideas?

KP

I have @KPuff and I am also familiar with Latin, brother. But to be honest, I am currently going through a kind of wilderness experience. For that reason, I would prefer to give others the space to respond.

I have noticed that few here are engaging deeply with the Scriptures, so I would rather allow them the opportunity to reply to what you shared.

I do not want to come across as someone who thinks he knows everything intellectually while failing to walk in the sphere of the Spirit.

Not deflecting brother.

God bless, to you and family.

Johann.

1 Like