Should Christians Ever Throw the First Stone? What Jesus Really Said

General Faith
1
Should Christians Ever Throw the First Stone? What Jesus Really Said

Should Christians Ever Throw the First Stone What Jesus Really Said
Should Christians Ever Throw the First Stone What Jesus Really Said1200×630 131 KB

As Christians reflect on how grace and justice work together, we invite your voice in Crosswalk Forums.
#GraceAndTruth #FirstStone #christianforums #crosswalkforums #forums #crosswalk #faithcommunity #faithforums

We’ve all heard the verse: “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone” (..: John 8:7 :..). But what does that really mean in today’s church? Should we avoid all correction—or is there still a place for speaking hard truths?

Jesus didn’t dismiss sin. He acknowledged it—but refused to let religious pride do the judging. That moment with the woman caught in adultery wasn’t about ignoring wrong—it was about confronting it without hypocrisy.

So how do we follow His example? When someone in our church falls, do we restore them gently… or reach for a stone?

Where do you draw the line between loving correction and harmful judgment? Have you ever been on the receiving end of either?

“Truth doesn’t excuse sin—but it also doesn’t excuse pride.”

Watch this short video devotional:

1 Like
2

The verse in John 8:7—“Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone”—was not a license for moral indifference, nor was it a rebuke of moral clarity. It was a direct confrontation of hypocritical judgment, not righteous correction. Jesus was exposing the Pharisees, not abolishing discipline.

Jesus never condoned her adultery—He told her plainly in verse 11: “Go, and sin no more.” That’s not permissiveness. That’s repentance. The woman’s accusers wanted death without mercy, but Christ offered mercy that demanded change.

The Church today should follow that exact model: truth and tenderness, holiness and humility. Galatians 6:1 commands:

“If anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.”

Restoration, not humiliation. Correction, not condemnation. We don’t trade stones for silence, we trade them for shepherd’s staffs.

Loving correction is marked by brokenness, not superiority. Harmful judgment is when truth is wielded like a weapon to crush, rather than a scalpel to heal.

And yes, I’ve been on both ends. It humbles you. Because real love tells the truth, even when it wounds, but always to heal, not to exile.

So the question isn’t whether we should speak hard truths. The question is whether we can do it with clean hands and a broken heart.

Truth never excuses sin. But it also never excuses pride.
If we can say that and mean it, we’re walking in Jesus’ footsteps, not the Pharisees’.

3

@Fritz et. al.

The way Jesus administered justice in this passage reminds me of the wise and clever administration of Justice by King Solomon as recorded in 1 Kings 3:16-28. Without setting aside the law, both wise kings exposed the true intent in the heart of the prosecution without doing undue harm to plaintiff or defendant; accuser or accused. This is Grace, the ability to resolve a dire situation by administering firm justice without abrogating mercy. In both cases, everyone who was present in the courtroom left better than when they came in.

**1 Kings 3:16-28**

Now two women who were harlots came to the king, and stood before him (King Solomon).

And one woman said, “O my lord, this woman and I dwell in the same house; and I gave birth while she was in the house. Then it happened, the third day after I had given birth, that this woman also gave birth. And we were together; no one was with us in the house, except the two of us in the house. And this woman’s son died in the night, because she lay on him. So she arose in the middle of the night and took my son from my side, while your maidservant slept, and laid him in her bosom, and laid her dead child in my bosom. And when I rose in the morning to nurse my son, there he was, dead. But when I had examined him in the morning, indeed, he was not my son whom I had borne.”

Then the other woman said, “No! But the living one is my son, and the dead one is your son.” And the first woman said, “No! But the dead one is your son, and the living one is my son.” Thus they spoke before the king.

And the king said, "The one says, ‘This is my son, who lives, and your son is the dead one’; and the other says, ‘No! But your son is the dead one, and my son is the living one.’ " Then the king said, “Bring me a sword.” So they brought a sword before the king. And the king said, “Divide the living child in two, and give half to one, and half to the other.”

Then the woman whose son was living spoke to the king, for she yearned with compassion for her son; and she said, “O my lord, give her the living child, and by no means kill him!” But the other said, "Let him be neither mine nor yours, but divide him." So the king answered and said, “Give the first woman the living child, and by no means kill him; she is his mother.”

And all Israel heard of the judgment which the king had rendered; and they feared the king, for they saw that the wisdom of God was in him to administer justice.

In awe of Him
KP