As the balance between law enforcement and liberty is tested, we want your thoughts. Join the discussion in Crosswalk Forums. #PolicingPolicy#FederalVsLocal#CrimeAndJustice#christianforums#crosswalkforums#forums#crosswalk#faithcommunity#faithforums
On May 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted the Trump administration to temporarily enforce a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military while legal challenges continue.
Supporters argue that this policy enhances military readiness and cohesion. Critics contend it discriminates against capable individuals willing to serve their country.
As Christians, how should we approach this issue?
Does this policy align with principles of justice and equality?
How do we balance national security concerns with the rights and dignity of individuals?
Of course they shouldn’t! Transgender people are perfectly capable of serving in the military and defending our nation. If anyone is willing to put her/his life on the line and be in the armed services, s/he should be allowed to serve in any capacity!
The military is a top-down organization with the Commander-in-Chief Trump ordering a ban, as well as signing an exec order as President.
Christians serving in the miltary can follow those orders and still be faithful to God.
Benny, His & Her may not be this example-person’s pronoun and if the pronoun is their, then wouldn’t one surmise that you have to say: “to put their lives on the line” - even though you are speaking about one (1) person. Things get confusing pretty quick and this is a just smaller wrinkle.
The two cases in Seattle and D.C. Fed Districts are still in preliminary stages and arguments are not fully developed or ripe for their respective judges (or us) to rule on. The issue ruled on by the Justices was about the injunction. There may be compelling evidence to support either side.
Service in the Military Services is open to all persons who can meet the high standards for military service and readiness without special accommodations,” the memo stated.
We may find out surgical costs, procedures, trends, esprit de corps issues, accommodation impediments, MOS lockouts, UCMJ violations, etc.. There is some, albeit short, history to pull from to use as supporting evidence for each side. I am eager to to see it unfold.
At first blush, I presumed it was a bad idea, aside from Basic/Ait close quarters scenarios. Not all branches run peacetime, misson readiness the same and day jobs are very different from deployed missions and active warfare. Unfortuately, it seems that current political unrest may force us to test our forces in combat sooner rather than later and they/them/their readiness shouldn’t be [a] [in] question.
Please remember: when you disagree with someone on a specific topic, it is inappropriate to question their salvation or ask if they are a Christian based on that disagreement. Doing so implies that disagreement equals unbelief — and that crosses the line into spiritual judgment, which is a violation of our Terms of Service.
Let’s stay focused on the topic, engage with one another respectfully, and leave room for differences without questioning someone’s faith.
Thanks for helping keep Crosswalk Forums a place of grace and meaningful dialogue.
You may DM me with any questions or email Community @salemwebnetwork.com
Why are you so focused on a person’s gender? You should be focusing instead on who s/he is as a person, i.e., their character, their spirit, their behavior toward others. Focusing on a person’s physical qualities instead of their “heart” is simply wrong. => Love your neighbor as yourself <=
