Should the songs we sing in church be evaluated for theological accuracy?
Dr. Dharius Daniels stresses the importance of ensuring worship songs align with Scripture. Should churches review songs for theological accuracy to protect sound doctrine? Share your thoughts! #WorshipTheology#SoundDoctrine#ChurchMusic#DhariusDaniels#FaithAndMusic
In this video, Dr. Dharius Daniels emphasizes the importance of sound theology in the songs we sing during worship. Music has a powerful influence on how we understand and internalize spiritual truths. If the lyrics we sing don’t align with Scripture, they could shape our beliefs in ways that aren’t biblically accurate.
As worship is a vital part of our faith, ensuring the songs reflect God’s Word and character is essential. How do we evaluate whether a worship song aligns with biblical teachings? Should churches take a more intentional approach to vetting the songs they include in their services?
Watch Dr. Daniels’ message and share your thoughts. Do you think worship songs should undergo a theological review before being sung in church?
With respect, I do think that worship songs should be theologically correct, but I can also sing tongue-in-cheek or even while biting my tongue— can’t you?
I’d be more concerned, and I’m certainly more aware of bad theology coming from the pulpit, than from the worship/music leader’s song choices. A quick look at Dr Daniels’ repertoire illustrates a ministry with an emphasis on tithing-- (huge red flag and common among "prosperity gospel false teachers) and messages where this personal life coach might go on for 20 minutes or more of “teaching” without the mention of a single passage of scripture.
Hi,
Does The Beatles song make you want to live in a yellow submarine?
Songs are poetry sung rather than just read.
Poetry is always given sone leeway as it can be allegory or hyperbole.
But I would say a song cannot violate the Apostles’ Creed.
Those are our core beliefs.
Overall, the song should not contradict the Bible.
Looking at your list of songs with “bad theology” Fritz… what specifically do you find objectionable in this first one?
I serve a risen Savior,
He’s in the world today;
I know that He is living,
Whatever men may say;
I see His hand of mercy,
I hear His voice of cheer,
And just the time I need Him
He’s always near.
He lives! He lives!
Christ Jesus lives today!
He walks with me, and talks with me
Along life’s narrow way.
He lives! He lives, salvation to impart!
You ask me how I know He lives:
He lives within my heart!
In all the world around me,
I see His loving care,
And though my heart grows weary
I never will despair;
I know that He is leading
Through all the stormy blast,
The day of His appearing
Will come at last!
Rejoice, rejoice, oh Christian,
Lift up your voice and sing
Eternal hallelujahs to
Jesus Christ the King!
The hope of all who seek Him,
The help of all who find,
None other is so loving,
So good and kind!
Chorus
He lives, He lives,
Christ Jesus lives today!
He walks with me and talks with me
Along life’s narrow way.
He lives, He lives, salvation to impart!
You ask me how I know He lives:
He lives within my heart!
The unnamed 'contributing Crosswalk writer puts it like this…
Consider the lyrics of He Lives and now ask yourself whether or not someone hearing voices telling them to do something unthinkable could not just as easily fit. How does he know the voices are real?
I guess the objection is the idea that God would speak to someone. I see a slight theological problem with the objection rather than with the lyric.
