The Parable of the 10 Virgins (Matthew 25:1-13)

I know I didn’t put my sources in the post, my apologies but I was trying not to make it longer than it already was. Plus I’m just trying to get my thoughts out. Maybe some of them are wrong? I appreciate your honesty in telling me so.

My comment about Judah vs. Jerusalem is because of the divided kingdom of Israel, Jerusalem being its capital, and Judah the two southern tribes which Israel separated themselves from. 1 Kings 12:16-19

The 10 tribes of Israel made Jeroboam king and the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, along with the Levites, remained with Rehoboam. The split was prophesied by the Lord (1 Kings 11:11-13, 29-39) because of Solomon’s sin. The kingdom of Judah was located in the same area as modern day Palestine. Why this is relevant I’m not sure, but I find it interesting when talking about the two baskets of figs in Jeremiah. Israel also turned to idolatry with Jeroboam’s Golden Calves at this time.

I’ll explain how I researched the two names, starting with the first use of the name Judah. The reason why I am researching the Hebrew words is simple. I, unlike the people Jesus was speaking to, do not know Hebrew. Both Hebrew and Aramaic are ancient languages and while English came from ancient Hebrew it is much different. The original ancient Hebrew was pictorial, much like Jesus’ parables. I have found that if I research the Hebrew it will give you very precise meaning. It also helps to understand the cultural aspects of the Hebrews which brings even more context to what is being said. It is the language of nomadic shepherds, each letter of their alphabet was a picture which by itself has more concrete meaning than the somewhat ambiguous Greek and now English words. There has been much difficulty in arriving at an accurate or adequate translation. Plus our cultures are completely different so it’s an East vs. West situation.

When two Hebrew letters are put together they form a family, when three are put together then they form a child. The imagery of the Hebrews was very powerful and not ambiguous at all, but it makes a word for word translation very difficult and maybe impossible without leaving off loads of meaning that the ancient Hebrews, and those of Jesus time would have understood easily. Here is the first mention of the word Judah:

Genesis 29:35
And she conceived again, and bare a son: and she said, Now will I praise the LORD: therefore she called his name Judah; and left bearing.

From the context of the verse we can see that there was a reason that Leah named her son Judah. Now if we get into the definition of the Hebrew words which (while I am in no way claiming to be an expert at) is what I look too if I want to understand the word and it’s cultural context better. (The source I’m copying from is a free Bible app called Kairos which allows me to look up the words like I would in a Strong’s Concordance). Here is what I found:
Judah
H3063
Lemma:
‎יהוּדה ⟺ יְהוּדָה
Transliteration:
yehûdâh
Pronunciation:
yeh-hoo-daw’
Part of Speech:
Proper Name Masculine
Root Word (Etymology):
From יָדָה H3034
BDB Lexicon:
Judah = “praised”

  1. the son of Jacob by Leah
  2. the tribe descended from Judah the son of Jacob
  3. the territory occupied by the tribe of Judah
  4. the kingdom comprised of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin which occupied the southern part of Canaan after the nation split upon the death of Solomon
  5. a Levite in Ezra’s time
  6. an overseer of Jerusalem in the time of Nehemiah
  7. a Levite musician in the time of Nehemiah
  8. a priest in the time of Nehemiah
    Strong’s Definitions:
    From יָדָה H3034; celebrated ; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory: - Judah.
    Occurrences in Bible:
    818
    Occurrences in Verses:
    754
    KJV usage:
    Judah (808x), Bethlehemjudah (with H1035) (10x).
    The Hebrew words are really wonderful in that they have roots that provide a pictorial explanation along with masculine, feminine, and other tenses which allow us to understand exactly what the user was talking about. In this case I see that there is a root word:
    Praise
    H3034
    Lemma:
    ‎ידה ⟺ יָדָה
    Transliteration:
    yâdâh
    Pronunciation:
    yaw-daw’
    Part of Speech:
    Verb
    Root Word (Etymology):
    A primitive root; used only as denominative from יָד H3027
    BDB Lexicon:
  9. to throw, shoot, cast
    a. (Qal) to shoot (arrows)
    b. (Piel) to cast, cast down, throw down
    c. (Hiphil)
  10. to give thanks, laud, praise
  11. to confess, confess (the name of God)
    d. (Hithpael)
  12. to confess (sin)
  13. to give thanks
    Strong’s Definitions:
    A primitive root; used only as denominative from יָד H3027; literally to use (that is, hold out) the hand ; physically to throw (a stone, an arrow) at or away; especially to revere or worship (with extended hands); intensively to bemoan (by wringing the hands): - cast (out), (make) confess (-ion), praise, shoot, (give) thank (-ful, -s, -sgiving).
    Occurrences in Bible:
    114
    Occurrences in Verses:
    111
    KJV usage:
    praise (53x), give thanks (32x), confess (16x), thank (5x), make confession (2x), thanksgiving (2x), cast (1x), cast out (1x), shoot (1x), thankful (1x).
    And there is a reference to another word; H3027 or Hand the first use of the word is found in Gen. 3:22 (here is where I begin to appreciate why they called Strong’s Concordance Exhaustive).
    Hand
    H3027
    Lemma:
    ‎יד ⟺ יָד
    Transliteration:
    yâd
    Pronunciation:
    yawd
    Part of Speech:
    Noun Feminine
    Root Word (Etymology):
    A primitive word
    BDB Lexicon:
  14. hand
    a. hand (of man)
    b. strength, power (figuratively)
    c. side (of land), part, portion (metaphorically) (figuratively)
    d. (various special, technical senses)
  15. sign, monument
  16. part, fractional part, share
  17. time, repetition
  18. axle-trees, axle
  19. stays, support (for laver)
  20. tenons (in tabernacle)
  21. a phallus, a hand (meaning unsure)
  22. wrists
    Strong’s Definitions:
    A primitive word; a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etc.), in distinction from כַּף H3709, the closed one); used (as noun, adverb, etc.) in a great variety of applications, both literally and figuratively, both proximate and remote: - (+ be) able, X about, + armholes, at, axletree, because of, beside, border, X bounty, + broad, [broken-] handed, X by, charge, coast, + consecrate, + creditor, custody, debt, dominion, X enough, + fellowship, force, X from, hand [-staves, -y work], X he, himself, X in, labour, + large, ledge, [left-] handed, means, X mine, ministry, near, X of, X order, ordinance, X our, parts, pain, power, X presumptuously, service, side, sore, state, stay, draw with strength, stroke, + swear, terror, X thee, X by them, X them-selves, X thine own, X thou, through, X throwing, + thumb, times, X to, X under, X us, X wait on, [way-] side, where, + wide, X with (him, me, you), work, + yield, X your-selves.
    Occurrences in Bible:
    1615
    Occurrences in Verses:
    1447
    KJV usage:
    hand (1,359x), by (44x), consecrate (with H4390) (14x), him (14x), power (12x), them (11x), places (8x), tenons (6x), thee (6x), coast (6x), side (5x), misc (130x).
    There is another great study tool that I have found if you are interested which has simplified this process for me a great deal. It is the Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible authored by Jeff A. Benner the founder of the Ancient Hebrew Research Center. But I still use my Strong’s dictionary too, and they tie together.

Does this help to understand my initial approach?

To summarize:

When we look to the words of the Son, we can also look to the words of His Father. In essence, the Lord God spoke in the First Person throughout the Old Testament—speaking through the prophets. And as He set the precedents, we can look to His precedents to better understand His Son. And a case in point is, The Parable of the 10 Virgins.

Many thanks for participating. If this thread proved to be a catalyst for thought, great.

If you have any questions remaining on this parable, lmk.

Peace.

sixthseal

1 Like

The parable of the 10 virgins is in direct correlation to those who claim the walk of Christ and the mysteries of the bible, but ears and eyes are closed to the truth. The 5 without the oil are believers who believed from the flesh and not the spirit. Their eyes and ears are shut and that’s why they missed the banquet. If anyone is curious, please read the 70 weeks of Daniel (use the Old Testament symbolism, and then connect the dots to the next mystery of the Olivet Discourse, and then the most important book of scriptures in this last church age, The book of Revelations. Every chapter in Rev. tells a story from Jesus til now and the end. Most of the prophesies have already been completed, and we are in the vial judgements, plus the 7th trumpet judgement.
The 2 witnesses happened about 400 hundred years ago, but so many missed its understanding. The opening of the pit of hell and those like scorpions would hurt but not touch the land. Look at the descriptions and they match the muslim hoards who spread over 2 empires in exact detail. One of the most strangest things I’ve heard in the 7 year tribulation and the antichrist appearing is a lie. This happened in the 7 years around Jesus and the fall of Jerusalem in 67 to 70 AD when the temple was desegrated. Every thing I say here is backed by scripture and history and the holy Spirit who guides the 5 virgins with the oil. There is so much evidence of this falling away from the truth, I am saddened by what I see. Especially Do Christians still have to believe in the Virgin Birth. These topics sow me the people who seek out truth, but there is no truth in them. If anybody is truly searching for answers, let me know and ill point you in the right direction.

This is simply your personal interpretation; I believe that you are stretching things…

I do not accept that the parable of the 10 virgins is in direct correlation to those who claim the walk of Christ and the mysteries of the bible, but ears and eyes are closed to the truth. That is really s-t-r-e-t-c-h-i-n-g things as is the idea that their eyes and ears are shut and that’s why they missed the banquet. The parable is clearly about readiness.

You may want to look up the meaning of Churchianity and Revelations 3:17 meaning. Pray in the spirit for the answers. One of the keys to the parable is the understanding of Revelations and the other two posted before. It’s like that verse that says “he will come like a thief in the night” and the falling away/ and the son of perdition will be revealed. The son of perdition has already been revealed and the falling away is almost complete. Thew mark of the beast for most of the world is already finished (Roman Catholic Church, the harlot church, and all other religions) For Christianity the Buy/sell component is so very soon. Remember the mark of God in the hand and forehead is our thoughts and actions around Christ/father. Satan has copied it in so many ways. A great part of today’s Christian church has become like the Pharisees , a soft approach to the truth for tickled ears. Most of todays Christianity will take the mark because they are the 5 virgins who missed the banquet. Theres so much more to it but I was suggested that if people didn’t get it, its because they have been blinded to the truth. I have to go but maybe later tonight

Let’s talk lamps, oil, and what’s really burning.

First off—props to both @Searching and @Benny. Searching’s throwing down a buffet of prophecy connections that would make a seminary professor’s head spin, and Benny’s trying to keep us tethered to the plain reading. But let me ask the room:

Are we looking to interpret the parable, or obey it?

Because Jesus didn’t tell this story so we could play theological Sudoku. He told it so we wouldn’t get locked out of the wedding.

“But while they were on their way to buy the oil, the bridegroom arrived. The virgins who were ready went in with him… and the door was shut.” – Matthew 25:10

Let that hit. THE. DOOR. WAS. SHUT.

Not debated. Not negotiated. SHUT.

So whether you lean preterist, futurist, idealist, or just realist—the punchline of the parable slaps the same: If you don’t have oil, you don’t get in.

What is that oil? Some say the Holy Spirit. Some say enduring faith. Some say a life of obedience. You know what? I say yes. It’s not about stockpiling prophetic timelines—it’s about walking in a living, breathing relationship with the Bridegroom now so you don’t miss Him then.

And if the lamp’s empty? You can’t borrow someone else’s fire. Not your pastor’s. Not your church’s. Not even your favorite YouTube prophet’s.

So instead of debating when the end is coming, maybe we oughta make sure we’re not running on fumes when it does.

Are your lamps full or just fancy?