What Age To Start Teaching Kids About God Seriously?

It’s important tfor those of us with children to teach them about our Lord and how to pray and stuff. To be their spiritual leader. The man has the designation of spiritual leader in the home, but the wives can certainly teach them also.

I did not do good as spiritual leader of my home and family when we were raising kids. We didn’t even take them to church until they was about 10 or so and that’s clearly way too late. I think 3 year olds can be taught how to pray!

The way I see it, young children were so to speak brn not too long ago so that means that they have been in Heaven with the Lord a lot more recently than we adults have (!!), so they probably have a greater capacity to learn the ways of the Lord than most adults! They were just there!

What do you think?

I, too, would suggest I was a bit lacking in that department as well. I did take them to church. Then they came to church because that was where I was. We had some Sporadic Bible Studies in the home when time and schedules allowed.

But then I see my Pastor’s Kids, reading three or four adult books a week. Brilliant in math and pretty skilled in scripture. Did I mention they were like 8 and 10 or os at the time? I asked him how. His response? “No TV. Movies. Worldly Music, and most definitely no electronics.” I said seriously? He said, “Uh, yeah. Why do you find that strange?”

Thinking to myself, well, mine have phones, tablets, go to friends’ houses whenever, friends come over whenever. You know, I try to let them be them. What I did say was “Oh. I see.” It was too late for mine. I tried after the fact, which was like a war. You would think "I’m taking your electronics away for a day was the same as beating them within an inch of their lives.

If I had it to do over, I would start as early as possible. Along with “Teaching them in the ways they should go,” I would deny the electronics. What may be extremely convenient for the parents, putting a screen in their face and they will leave you alone, is more detramently then you could ever possibly realize.
Peter

2 Likes

Amen Brother. You’re right, no electronics are some fond memories of mine. They didn’t even have pong until after I had kids, and so as kids I never had video games. The most we had was television so we spent a lot of time outside stomping around in the world. It was nice then! We ate together, played together talked all the time and was outside for a lot of it. So I wound up raising my kids that way and we did a lot of camping and hunting and all sorts of stuff. A little bit of fishing. I wasn’t walking with the Lord and so we didn’t have any bible studies when we raised kids, mostly because she was catholic and we didn’t see eye to eye on God?

If I could do it over knowing what I know now, it would be different. IIRC, kids from birth to about age 7 are absorbing everything they see and hear like a sponge and programming their subconscious. No wonder scripture says

Proverbs 22:6

**6 **Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it…/KJV

Because if we start them ultra early, they’ll have it for life in their heart. Hey I know! Mommey there a monster under my bed or in the closet…? Teach them to tell it to leave in Jesus name! No problem!

After age 7 they begin thinking more and more for themselves and are quick to learn to be mischevious, so it seems extra important to ground them in Christ as early as possible.

2 Likes

“And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.”

2 Timothy 3:15 (KJV)

Greek Text.

καὶ ὅτι ἀπὸ βρέφους τὰ ἱερὰ γράμματα οἶδας, τὰ δυνάμενά σε σοφίσαι εἰς σωτηρίαν διὰ πίστεως τῆς ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ.

Key Greek Words…
ἀπὸ βρέφους (apo brephous) “from infancy,” “from a baby,” or “from earliest childhood.”
βρέφος (brephos) refers to an infant, newborn, or very young child.
The phrase emphasizes that Timothy’s exposure to Scripture began at the earliest possible age.
τὰ ἱερὰ γράμματα (ta hiera grammata) “the sacred writings” or “holy Scriptures.”
At the time Paul wrote this, this primarily referred to the Old Testament Scriptures (Tanakh).
The Jewish Context

Timothy was raised in a Jewish household through his mother and grandmother:

“When I call to remembrance the genuine faith that is in you, which dwelt first in your grandmother Lois and your mother Eunice…”

2 Timothy 1:5

His mother was Jewish:

“A certain disciple was there, named Timothy, the son of a certain Jewish woman who believed, but his father was Greek.”

Acts 16:1

In Jewish practice, children were taught the Scriptures from a very young age. The command comes from:

“And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children…”

Deuteronomy 6:6–7

This passage reflects the Jewish pattern of covenant instruction, where parents continually taught God’s Word in daily life. Timothy’s knowledge of Scripture “from infancy” is therefore a fulfillment of this biblical model of discipleship.

Related Passage.

Paul’s statement echoes the Jewish conviction expressed in:

“Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”

Proverbs 22:6

Thus, ἀπὸ βρέφους (apo brephous) highlights that Timothy was instructed in the Scriptures from infancy according to the Jewish practice of diligently teaching God’s Word to children within the home.

And that from a child thou hast known the holy Scriptures,… And therefore must know that the doctrines he had learned were agreeable to them; and so is another reason why he should continue in them. The Jews very early learned their children the holy Scripture. Philo the Jew says (w), εκ πρωτης ηλικιας “from their very infancy”; a phrase pretty much the same with this here used. It is a maxim with the Jews (x), that when a child was five years of age, it was proper to teach him the Scriptures.

Timothy’s mother being a Jewess, trained him up early in the knowledge of these writings, with which he became very conversant, and under divine influence and assistance, arrived to a large understanding of them; and it is a practice that highly becomes Christian parents; it is one part of the nurture and admonition of the Lord they should bring up their children in: the wise man’s advice in Pro_22:6 is very good.

From hence the apostle takes occasion to enter into a commendation of the sacred writings; and here, from the nature and character of them, calls them the
holy Scriptures; to distinguish them from profane writings; and that because the author of them is the Holy Spirit of God; and even the amanuenses of him, and the penmen of them, were holy men of God; the matter of them is holy, both law and Gospel; and the end of writing them is to promote holiness; the precepts, promises, and doctrines contained in them are calculated for that purpose; and even the account they give of the sins and failings of others, are for the admonition of men: and next these Scriptures are commended from the efficacy of them:
which are able to make thee wise unto salvation. Men are not wise of themselves; they are naturally without an understanding of spiritual things; and the things of the Spirit of God cannot be known by natural men, because they are spiritually discerned; particularly they are not wise in the business of salvation, of which either they are insensible themselves, and negligent; or foolishly build their hopes of it upon their civility, morality, legal righteousness, or an outward profession of religion: but the Scriptures are able to make men wise and knowing in this respect; for the Gospel is one part of the Scriptures, which is the Gospel of salvation, and shows unto men the way of salvation. The Scriptures testify largely of Christ, the Saviour; and give an ample account both of him, who is the able, willing, suitable, complete, and only Saviour, and of the salvation which is wrought by him; and describe the persons who do, and shall enjoy it: not that the bare reading of the Scriptures, or the hearing of them expounded, are able to make men wise in this way; but these, when accompanied with the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Christ, are; when he who endited the Scriptures removes the veil from their eyes, opens their understandings, and gives them light and knowledge in them: and then may persons be said to be wise unto salvation, when they not only have a scheme of it in their heads, but are in their hearts sensible of their need of it, and know that there is salvation in no other but in Christ; and when they look to him for it, to his righteousness for justification, to his blood for peace, pardon, and cleansing, to his sacrifice for atonement, and to his fulness of grace for a continual supply, and to him for eternal life and glory; when they rejoice in him and his salvation, and give him all the glory of it: the apostle adds,
Gill.

Looks like the best cure for “AI-phobia” is a healthy dose of actually using it, right brother? Age 5 a good place to start teaching our children?

J.

1 Like

I think honestly you can start teaching children about the Lord from birth. Even though they won’t mentally remember it until they are maybe three or four, I think their bodies will store the memory of how you prayed over them as babies or took them to church or sang worship songs to them, etc. My two-year-old loves praying before meals or hearing his blessing before bed. These things are so formative!

2 Likes

With AI? That isn’t a good idea. It’s demonic.

I bet you’re exactly right. In fact, hmmm…At less than one year old they are alert, and…they just left the presence of God, so to do much praying and praising the Lord to them and in front of them has to be a good thing, even at that age. What they still lack in cognitive abilities, they still have spiritual connection with God, right? I think so.

1 Like

Yes! I certainly think so.

Teach God’s seriousness very young. Not necessarily the revelation type stuff, but more than the storybook Bible

1 Like

Yeah, mine too. No cell phones, no cameras everywhere, no tracking. We went out, ran all over town, and you know what? My grandmother always seemed to know what we did. We would, of course, be out until the streetlights came on and home for dinner.

Nowadays, you can lock kids outside, and they will stand, or more likely sit, and stare at each other, completely absent from any thought of what to do. Sad when you think about it.
Peter

2 Likes

Loved and agreed with everything you said until this.

You know, I feel like the moment anyone raises a hand to say, “Hey, I have a concern about this,” they get immediately slapped with a “phobia” label to shut down the discussion. There is a massive difference between clinical phobias, sociological labels, and legitimate, critical concerns.

To understand how we got here, and when the line actually gets crossed, it helps to look at how the word “phobia” got hijacked, and what separates an honest warning from a true phobic reaction. From fear to dislike. Historically and medically, a phobia is an irrational, intense, and debilitating psychological fear of something specific (like arachnophobia or the fear of spiders, or acrophobia, the fear of heights. However, in modern language, the suffix “-phobia” has evolved from a psychological term to a political and sociological one.

In terms like homophobia or transphobia, it doesn’t mean the person is literally shaking with fear; it is used to describe animosity, aversion, prejudice, or discrimination. Now, we see it jumping to tech with “AI-phobia” or “technophobia,” used to label anyone hesitant about rapid technological replacement. When does a concern become a “phobia”?

The line between an honest concern and a phobia, in the modern, sociological sense, usually comes down to three things: objectivity, proportionality, and the desire for engagement. Based on observable data, historical precedents, or logical ethical frameworks. Based on stereotypes, deep-seated disgust, personal discomfort, or a total lack of exposure.

The goal is to protect people, preserve ethics, or fix a flaw. The goal is to push the group, identity, or technology completely out of sight. AI-Phobia: A rigid, irrational refusal to use any digital tool, claiming all AI is inherently evil, demonic, or destined to terminate humanity next Tuesday, without understanding how the technology actually works.

Honest questions vs. prejudices? This is where the cultural debate is the most fiery, because the “phobia” label is often used as a blunt instrument to bypass conversation. Raising complex legal, philosophical, or ethical questions, such as discussing the fairness of biological sexes in sports, navigating the religious freedom of a business owner, or asking how to protect children’s development. These are deeply held societal questions that require careful, empathetic debate. When the dialogue stops being about policies or principles and turns into active hostility, dehumanizing language, bullying, or denying a person’s basic right to exist, work, and live safely.

Why is everything labeled a phobia now? The reason the phrase is thrown around so casually today comes down to a modern debate tactic: Pathologizing the opposition. If someone disagrees with a cultural shift or a new technology, arguing the actual points takes time, nuance, and effort. But if you can label their disagreement as a “phobia,” you instantly frame them as irrational, broken, or malicious.

It turns a legitimate intellectual or ethical debate into a medical or moral failing, effectively disqualifying their voice from the room. The antidote to this is demanding specificity. When someone tries to apply a blanket “-phobia” label, the best response is usually to pull the conversation back to the data: “I’m not operating out of fear or hatred. Let’s look at the facts, risks, and ethics of this specific issue.”
Peter

Milk before meat. Amen.
Peter

I have to disagree with this here. Who should man be talking to in order to be saved and not die? Ai or God? AI merely creates a distraction in people away from the Lord. And so I have concluded that anything which draws ones time away from the Lord…has to be demonic.

1 Like

At age 2, my son was able to name dinosaurs with more letters than I can spell. If kids can do that, they can learn about God from an early age. :hugs:

3 Likes

I agree with you. I said this.

My point was not whether AI is demonic, but rather why, if someone questions it, we are labeled AI-phobic. I see nothing wrong with using it as a research tool. As long as what you get jives with the Word. Oh, I’m never saying that again. The problem is when you start turning over your Spiritual life to a machine instead of God.
Peter

2 Likes

They understand authority also. When a toddler wants something which requires permission, you can can catch them peeking to see if you are watching them. Mom isn’t watching grab a cookie…then momma is there! DId you get into the cookies? And they begin studying their shoes! And older siblings will try to exercise authority over younger siblings for sure, so yes mamn they understand authority.

So they could grasp that, in Jesus name they have authority to tell monsters (evil spirits) to leave and not come back.

My kids never had a problem with monsters under the bed / in the closet, thank God.

1 Like

Yeah, I felt that when he said that because I was the one who said it was demonic. Creating sociological labels and trying to pin them to people is a total distraction from the discussion. So I had to say something, lol.

Do you know why Enoch was taken by God? Because he went off to live in a quiet cave so he could hear God more clearly…away from the AI (distractions). And it worked for him! He was so close to the Lord that the Nephilim tried to hire him as their attorney to represent them to God for their evil deeds. (That’s saying something!) So if we, as Christians would take the time that we would have given to AI and use that time to cultivate our own personal relationship with the Lord instead, we could do our research from the horses mouth so to speak!

Ai is not needed and will not and can not lead man to God. (Thus, it is demonic). That’s why I have never asked Ai even one question’ I’ve read some of Ai’s responses to my Googles and I can see that it will speak much truth, however, it is not the spirit of God and is deceptive, and a scourge upon mankind. The best lies are couched in the truth, so even false prophets speak some truths. And only add in subtle things which draw us away from the Lord and asking the wrong questions. So I was surprised to see that some pastor’s are using Ai to help them in sermon preperation or even to write complete sermons! Where is God in that? Nowhere my friend.

Enoch didn’t have a laptop with Ai. I bet He spent much time in prayer, talking to the Word of the Lord God. There is your research resource right there.

One time I remember, I asked the Lord a question, and He told me I asked the wrong question. Then He gave me more pertinant things to consider that had not entered my mnd yet! Another time He told me that I am not able yet to bear the answer and that He would tell me whatever I needed to know, when I needed it and when I could bear it.

Ai ever said that to you? (lol). I’m guessing not. A few times I have come up with very good questions that I could ask Ai. But in order to do I that I would have to spend some time with Ai, with it’s distractions from the Lord and I can feel that even in it’s trying to draw me into it that it is demnic for it asks me for my time apart from the Lord.

The Holy Spirit has never told me to use Ai. Did the Holy Spirit tell you to do research with Ai? Or was it your idea? Your curiosity? That may be a clue right there.

Any grown-ups in the room?

AI skepticism (neutral, academic)
AI apprehension (mild concern)
AI resistance (opposition to AI adoption)
AI aversion (strong dislike)
AI distrust (lack of confidence in AI)
Concerns about AI (diplomatic)
Reservations about AI (polite and measured)
Caution regarding AI (non-confrontational)
Reluctance toward AI (gentle)
Technological skepticism (broader category)
Algorithmic skepticism (more technical)
Resistance to AI-assisted tools (specific)

This better @PeterC?

J.

Ok got it, you like Ai. That’s ok no sweat there but would it be ok if we tried to stay on topic?

Excuse me? By posting this and an attempt at an insult, which was pointless, you totally missed the point. But carry on.
Peter