Who or what is the “rock” upon which Jesus builds his church, according to Matthew 16?

Theology
1

I hear a lot of discussion about this one verse, Matthew 16:18–Jesus’ words: “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” I think that God has led me to a solution by examining the full context of that verse, as follows:

Mat 16:13 Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?”
Mat 16:14 And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
Mat 16:15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?”
Mat 16:16 Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
Mat 16:17 And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven.
Mat 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Mat 16:19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
Mat 16:20 Then he strictly charged the disciples to tell no one that he was the Christ.
Mat 16:21 From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised.
Mat 16:22 And Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him, saying, “Far be it from you, Lord! This shall never happen to you.”
Mat 16:23 But he turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me. For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man.”
Mat 16:24 Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.
Mat 16:25 For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
Mat 16:26 For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul?
Mat 16:27 For the Son of Man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done.
Mat 16:28 Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”

The key verse in this passage and the one upon which the rest of the chapter is built as part of the history of Jesus’ ministry is Peter’s profession of faith in verse 16. That is the “rock” which is the foundation of Jesus’ church, certainly not fallible people like Peter, who, as an instrument of Satan, takes Jesus to task for saying that he was going to die at Jerusalem and rise again. Instead, people who deny themselves, accept the suffering that comes with Peter’s profession of faith, and follow Jesus alone are the ones whom Jesus includes in his church.

In reviewing this whole passage, who or what do you think is the “rock”? Why?

1 Like
2

In Matthew 16 the immediate context strongly suggests that the “rock” is not Peter as an isolated infallible individual, but rather the revealed confession concerning Christ, namely:

“You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” — Matthew 16:16 (ESV)

Jesus responds:

“Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church.” — Matthew 16:17–18 (ESV)

The Greek text contains a distinction:

Peter = Πέτρος (Petros) -a stone, rock fragment
Rock = πέτρα (petra) -bedrock, massive rock foundation

While related, the distinction is still meaningful within the flow of the text. The emphasis falls not merely upon Peter’s person, but upon the divine revelation he confessed.

The context immediately afterward is extremely important. The same Peter who had just confessed Christ is then rebuked:

“Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me. For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man.” - Matthew 16:23 (ESV)

That creates a major contextual difficulty if Peter himself, personally and indefectibly, is the foundational rock in an exclusive sense. Within only a few verses, the “rock” becomes a “stumbling block” (σκάνδαλον, skandalon).

The broader New Testament repeatedly identifies Christ Himself as the true foundation stone.

Paul writes:

“For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” - 1 Corinthians 3:11 (ESV)

Again:

“And all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank from the spiritual Rock that followed them, and the Rock was Christ.” - 1 Corinthians 10:4 (ESV)

Peter himself later says:

“As you come to him, a living stone rejected by men but in the sight of God chosen and precious.” - 1 Peter 2:4 (ESV)

And:

“The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.” - 1 Peter 2:7 (ESV)

Paul likewise teaches:

“Built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone.” - Ephesians 2:20 (ESV)

Notice carefully, the apostles collectively are foundational in a derivative sense because of their apostolic testimony, but Christ remains the cornerstone and ultimate foundation.

The “keys of the kingdom” in Matthew 16:19 are also not uniquely Petrine in an absolute sense, because authority to bind and loose is later extended to the disciples corporately:

“Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven.” — Matthew 18:18 (ESV)

Likewise in John:

“If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them.” John 20:23 (ESV)

So Peter certainly has a prominent apostolic role. He is often the spokesman among the apostles, opens the kingdom to Jews in Acts 2 and Gentiles in Acts 10, and is undeniably significant in redemptive history. But the text itself does not require the conclusion that Peter alone is the infallible rock upon which the entire church rests.

Rather, the strongest exegetical reading is that the church is built upon the revelation and confession that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, with Christ Himself ultimately being the true foundation and cornerstone.

2 cents.

J.

2 Likes
3

Seems to me that this should work like it would in a classroom setting. Once He says, “you are Peter”, that ends the question and answer between them, subject is about to change. The change, if still directed at Peter, should once again have Him say Peter’s name, He does not do that. It appears that He has a pause, breaks eye contact with Peter, returns His attention to everyone, and probably motions with His hands, then begins to speak to them once again as a group. It would not say the pause, and change in eye contact, so it just runs together. Basically He went from “Who am I?”, to who they all are, not just Peter. How I see it anyway.

4

Thank you for your excellent response, @Johann!

1 Like
5

I’m puzzled by your response, @CloserThanABrother. What is your “bottomline”? That is, what is your interpretation of the “rock,” and what did you think of my analysis? I’m just curious.

6

Very well put indeed. And building a religious system around a man is unwise. Many would argue that papal dogma and history prove how true this is.

Because the Church is built on Christ, “the gates of Hades” (not “Hell”) will never overpower it. I’d agree with the Faithlife Study Bible here: “Jesus seems to be saying that through His power, the Church will overcome the powers of evil and death itself.”

2 Likes
7

I am sorry for not being clear. @Bruce_Leiter His rock is going to be all the Apostles, minus Judas, with Paul grafted in. Peter wasn’t the only one that didn’t exactly ooze with confidence, they are going to need to be united as one rock. Whether the message is laid down in Asia, Asia Minor, Africa, or Europe, the message has to be the same. What you have said about Peter, is going to need to apply to them all. One can not be at every location, and people need to be adding to what has been delivered, not trying to correct what the previous Apostles had started. That would lead to all out chaos before a foundation could even be laid.
Once Christ says, “you are Peter”, I see that ending the one on one strictly with Peter, and He is about to return to speaking with all of them. He would pause, break off direct eye contact with only Peter, returning it once again to everyone, then continue speaking. He is talking to all of them when he says, “and you are my rock”. There can be no weak links, they all must work to be His rock. Unified as one rock, speaking in multiple voices. People traditionally see the dialog as running together to apply just to Peter, I see a pause, change in eye contact to reflect a return to the group, then the rock.

8

Rock=Revelation of who Jesus is.

Foundation is Jesus…

But As my teacher might say- God uses ordinary, flawed people to build His church.

Petros- pebble or stone

Petra- Rock or Mass

You are a stone (pebble), on your confession revealed by God is how I will build my church…(my interpretation)

What was the Stone that the builders rejected? Was it a rock or pebble, mass…was it Jesus who is the Christ.

Did they reject revelation? In the stone that the builders rejected?

The metaphor traces back to Psalm 118:22, where a discarded stone is miraculously elevated by God to become the most vital part of the structure. The New Testament writers directly identify this stone as Jesus:

  • It is not just a pebble: The original Hebrew word used in Psalm 118 is eben, which refers to a massive, weighty stone. In the New Testament, Jesus is described as the lithos akrogoniaios—the chief cornerstone or foundation stone.

  • He was rejected: Willard often reflected on how the religious leaders and the culture of Jesus’ day cast Him aside as unfit or unnecessary.

  • He became the foundation: God exalted Jesus, making His life, death, and resurrection the very foundation of the Christian faith and the Church.

What would pebble have meant back in their time?

The Power of a Pebble - GGWO Church Baltimore The Power of a Pebble - GGWO Church Baltimore

Let’s try on pebble as a witness

YOU ARE WITNESS ON THIS TESTIMONY OF THE REVELATION OF Jesus, as the Son of the living God, I will build my church.

Revelation in my view definitely would make one come alive- so what was Peter a witness to ?

Im going to try this on: He was a witness to Experiencing coming alive through by revelation of who Jesus is. Blessed…How would He be blessed or happy? The father revealed Jesus to Him…

Or is it an overall blessing, what happens through His life?

In his writings Divine Conspiracy Willard explained that Peter’s realization wasn’t just correct doctrine; it was a realization that the universe is an “interactive reality” governed by God. By recognizing Jesus as the Christ, Peter realized that the kingdom of God was present right there, and that this life with God is the ultimate good.

I would think His blessedness was immediate and even continues…was it?

9

great topic ya’ll me lerns stuf

10

You have an interpretation, @CloserThanABrother, but much of your interpretation is not found in the verses themselves. I suggest that you are reading into the verse what is not there in it or in the context.