Why Is Jesus Called the "Son of Man"?

Yes my brother @Johann, it’s truly eye-opening. Although it’s a catholic book, this is christians all over the world. I recommened everyone to read volume 11(The bitter passion of our Lord Jesus Christ) and I truly say, one will cry like a child, like I have. Here i give you the site from where I read: It has fifteen parts in volume 11, to get part 1 u can click:


After clicking -older posts u will get from part 1 to part 5, then after reading part 5 u can click on:

But read it in the order of part1, part2…part15 then only one will grasp the depth of the Passion of the Lord

Peace to all,

To me, through both natures, Holy Spirit Incorruptibility and Flesh Immortality through The New Eve in Immaculate Felsh Jesus is called Son of Man from the Immaculate Conception conceived from the Power of the Holy Spirit Family One God in being through the Immaculate Conception in The New Eve for the Virgin Birth of Jesus becoming from The New Adam through Holy Spirit Incorruption and Son of God incorruption and immortality through the Christ in One Body becoming again One Holy Spirit Family One God in being, in all mankind

We all all saved by Faith through The Christ.
Surely we will never die, not the Holy Spirit anyway any how. We get a New Body nature.
Jesus says, in John 21:22-23 “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? You must follow me.”

To me the Two Natures of God from the Faith of Abraham are understood, spirit and life as becoming One Body through the Christ, Son of God and Son of Man, conceived by the Power of the Holy Spirit Family through the Immaculate Flesh in Jesus in all mankind as brothers and sisters becoming again One Body of our own Christ becoming again in One Holy Spirit Family through both natures in One Holy Family One God in being.

Samuel, Thanks for the information on Anne Catherine, I have never heard anything so new quite so grand, thanks again. To me, Anne Catherine is a Faith mystic, not a logic mystic, and I say this in a good way, for all.

And What are your thoughts, Samuel_23, so far on the logic I am seeing with your help and Anne Catherine’s help, too.? Thanks in advance and could you be so kind as to rated the thoughts here on a scale of 1 to 10 for me with a 10 being the best? Thanks again, and to everyone.

Anne Catherine in her writings are inspiring and truly faithful, and now even more logic becomes to me again more helpful to me in understanding even more the logic needed for understanding the Mind of God to me, logically.

Logically the God from the Faith of Abraham resurrects Two Natures, Spirit and life, God and Temple in One Holy Family in One Holy Spirit Family One God in being through The Christ, Jesus, Son of Man through the flesh, Son of God from the Power of the Holy Spirit becoming The Family, again.

Nobody on the planet can hear me, logically, Samuel_23, but maybe 1 out of 11.

The statistics never change to me, for perhaps 40 years and 11 times a day I tell the logical story of The Christ, 11 will hear, 5 will not want to listen, some will try to silence me, telling me who He is not, and what He can’t do, and who He will not be, 5 won’t understand for a few times at least, yet One will become the Disciple to become to know the logic of The Christ uniting all as One in being for all souls created from The Father transformed through The Mother becoming immortality for The Son in The Christ in all mankind becoming again glorified and incorruptibly transfigured in the Holy Family in One Holy Spirit Family One God in being, to me.

And this is just generalization for educational thought, We know I am not preaching only generalizing through logic I see as faithful with respect to the teachings of Christ, logically.

To me, who logically can’t see the Father together with The Son and The Mother in One Holy Spirit Family before creation was ever created was even created as Personal Gods in being becoming again all One Holy Spirit Family all brothers and sisters of The Christ and Sons and Daughters of The One God in being in all mankind? Please think this out, rationally, for all. Let’s not be silly? Just kidding, here. Silly Willy.

Thanks Samuel_23 for the information on Anne Catherine
The complete visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich
To me, truly brilliant.
“As incomprehensible as it may be to us, Anne Catherine was already blessed since her early childhood with a gift, according to her intense devotion: to have access to a direct knowledge of the life of Jesus, of the Holy Family, of the apostles and of other saints. Those are her “visions”, through which she does not only contemplate historical events, but she is also able to perceive the feelings and thoughts of the protagonists. In the literature on mysticism it is explained how a similar capacity comes occasionally to spiritually developed people.”

And to me, the logic is not quite clear even to Anne Catherine, yet so close and so true, faithfully. To me, The Mind of God is not truly clear until the Faith is logically understood.

And surely, always we know we are saved by Faith in The Christ.

Peace always,
Stephen

1 Like

@StephenAndrew, If what I have sent is helpful for you and opens your mind, to know more about God, im more pleased than anyone, continue, my brother, in studying more about Our Lord.I can see that your heart is sincerely seeking God and trying to understand the profound mysteries of Christ, and how the His union of his divine and human nature exist, I love the fact that what I have said opens your mind, and make you heart more deovtional towards God. When you write posts from your heart and I read, i feel like it 9/10, truly my brother, you are more devoted than many christians I have come across.
Praise be to God ..
Peace

@Corlove13

I would put it in this manner.

Jesus came not in grandeur but as a humble servant, just as foretold in Isaiah 42:1: “Behold My Servant, whom I uphold, My chosen one in whom My soul delights; I have put My Spirit upon Him; He will bring forth justice to the nations.” This was fulfilled in Matthew 12:18. In Philippians 2:7, the phrase μορφὴν δούλου (morphēn doulou) means “the form of a servant,” and the verb ἐκένωσεν (ekenōsen) means “He emptied Himself,” showing the willing humility of the Son of God.

He is everything mankind was intended to be. Romans 5:19 says, “For as through the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous.” Jesus lived out the obedience Adam failed to offer. He is called πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως (prōtotokos pasēs ktiseōs), “the firstborn of all creation” in Colossians 1:15, not as one created but as the preeminent representative of redeemed humanity.

He is the true image-bearer, the εἰκὼν τοῦ Θεοῦ (eikōn tou Theou), “the image of God” as stated in 2 Corinthians 4:4. He showed what life looks like when man walks in full obedience and fellowship with God. Colossians 3:3–4 affirms our connection to Him: “For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life, is revealed, then you also will be revealed with Him in glory.”

God, in His foreknowledge, declared the plan of redemption before time began. Isaiah 46:10 says, “Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel will stand, and I will accomplish all My good pleasure.’” This divine foresight prepared those who cherished the Scriptures to recognize the Messiah when He came. Simeon in Luke 2:25–32 is one example. He waited for the consolation of Israel and, moved by the Spirit, recognized Jesus as the promised One.

Jesus came to enter into our condition. Hebrews 4:15 says, “For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things just as we are, yet without sin.” The verb here is συμπαθῆσαι (sympathēsai), “to sympathize,” revealing His full participation in human experience without spiritual defilement. In John 17:16, He says of Himself and His disciples, “They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world.”

He is the way from heaven to earth. In John 3:13 Jesus declares, “No one has ascended into heaven, except He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man.” In John 1:51 He adds, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you will see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.” This recalls the vision given to Jacob in Genesis 28:12 and shows that Jesus is the living connection between heaven and earth.

He came ἐν ὁμοιώματι σαρκὸς ἁμαρτίας (en homoiōmati sarkos hamartias), “in the likeness of sinful flesh,” according to Romans 8:3. Yet He was filled with the Spirit of God without measure, as John 3:34 states: “For He whom God has sent speaks the words of God; for He gives the Spirit without measure.” At His baptism, the Holy Spirit descended upon Him (Luke 3:22), confirming Him as the chosen vessel through whom the will of God would be perfectly accomplished.

God bless.

Johann

2 Likes

Peace to all,

We ask, How does God do it? From the Father Becomes One Son, same One in each nature, Son of God from teh Holy Spirit and Son of Man through the Immaculate Flesh for all to become One again in being? Logically? God adds a nature to the same Son and unites both natures through The Christ from One Father through One Mother for Mary’s Son Jesus becoming The Christ in all becoming again for all One in being, to me, logically.

The Son of Man is also the Son of God becoming the Logical Christ through both natures in our own personal Christ becoming again in One Family One God in being together, rationally, to me.

Son of Man is how flesh saves the angels and all from the Bosom of Abraham, logically.

We know not to judge or preach and only in logical generalization do we say we know some see the New Home as a Place and some others see New Church as a building or a big Holy room, but logically the New Body is our own Christ, Body of God with the Church of God Nature and the Family of God Nature living inside of all of us becoming our own Christ, our Spirit God and Our Church Building becoming again in all a new land, Heaven and Earth combined in One Heaven becoming again One Holy Spirit Family One God in being.

Son of Man is from The Father of Creation from Heaven through both natures, spirit and flesh in One Christ Body becoming again One Holy Spirit Family One God in all.

Mary is Mother of Son of Man, Anne Catherine helps confirmed through the spirit that The Christ becomes the Host that immortally transforms flesh and glorifies and incorruptibly transfigures through the Power of The Holy Spirit Family One God in being in all as One in being.

Thanks again, Samuel, you are close to the logic I see, and can you realize faithfully and logically the God of Two Natures is The God of the Faith from Abraham?

God unites spirit and life, God and temple from One Father through One Mother for One Son in the Christ becoming again One Holy Spirit Family One God in being, to me.

Those that see Jesus the Son of God see the New God, The New Spirit from the Spirit Nature.
Those that see Jesus the Son of Man see the New Temple, The New Life through the Flesh Nature,

Those that see Jesus the Son of God, Incorruptible Holy Spirit and The Son of Man immortal immaculate New flesh in One Holy Apostolic Union are Catholic, united through both natures in One Body One in being One Holy Spirit Family One God in being, to me, logically, rationally and Through the Faith of Abraham.

And both faithfully and logically together no one even knows.

Why me?

Peace always,
Stephen

1 Like

Because Jesus Christ when on earth was 100% man and 100% God…He was Son of God and Son of Man…He was God manifested in the flesh

The Bible does not use the phrase “God the Son” even one time. It is not a correct term because the Son of God refers to the humanity of Jesus Christ. The Bible defines the Son of God as the child born of Mary, not as the eternal Spirit of God (Luke 1:35). “Son of God” may refer to the human nature or it may refer to God manifested in flesh—that is, deity in the human nature. “Son of God” never means the incorporeal Spirit alone, however. We can never use “Son” correctly apart from the humanity of Jesus Christ. The terms “Son of God,” “Son of man,” and “Son” are appropriate and biblical. However, the term “God the Son” is inappropriate because it equates the Son with deity alone, and therefore it is unscriptural. The death of Jesus is a particularly good example. His divine Spirit did not die, but His human body did. We cannot say that God died, so we cannot say “God the Son” died. On the other hand, we can say that the Son of God died because “Son” refers to humanity.

If we could justify the use of the phrase “God the Son” at all, it would be by pointing out, as we have done, that “Son of God” encompasses not only the humanity of Jesus but also the deity as resident in the humanity. However, John 1:18 uses “Son” to refer to the humanity, for it says the Father (the deity of Jesus) is revealed through the Son. This verse of Scripture does not mean that God is revealed by God but that God is revealed in flesh through the humanity of the Son. "Son of God” refers to the humanity of Jesus. Clearly the humanity of Jesus is not eternal but was born in Bethlehem. One can speak of eternal existence in past, present, and future only with respect to God. Since “Son of God” refers to humanity or to deity as manifest in humanity, the idea of an eternal Son is incomprehensible. The Son (God’s Humanity) of God had a beginning.

StephenAndrew—

Peace to you, brother. And let me say this with a whole lot of respect and just a dash of sanctified sass: your post reads like a theological word salad that took a joyride through mysticism, logic loops, and Immaculate Conception highways without stopping for gas at Scripture.

You’ve got zeal—praise God for that. But zeal without clarity is like a trumpet blown off-key (1 Cor. 14:8). I hear you reaching for deep truth, trying to connect Incarnation, the Holy Spirit, the New Eve, and the Family of God—but what you’re presenting sounds more like a cosmic mashup than clear Trinitarian theology.

So let’s bring it back to bedrock.

What Scripture Actually Says:
Jesus is called the Son of Man because He is the fulfillment of Daniel 7:13–14—the One who comes with the clouds, is given dominion and glory, and reigns forever. That title isn’t some poetic blend of spiritual essence and “Immaculate Flesh energy”—it’s a loaded declaration of both His humanity and His divine, eschatological authority.

John 21:22–23? That’s Jesus rebuking Peter’s curiosity, not a revelation about divine nature logic matrices. And while Anne Catherine Emmerich may offer stirring meditations, they are not the standard of doctrinal discernment—the Word of God is (2 Tim. 3:16-17).

Let me be clear with love: The Trinity is not a “Holy Spirit Family reunion” where the Son and the Mother become God “in all mankind.” That’s neither biblical, nor consistent with Nicene orthodoxy. Christ is eternally begotten of the Father, not a product of a cosmic parental committee. The Holy Spirit is a Person, not just a divine vibe flowing between family members.

Also… one small, brotherly note? Ease up on the mystical math. “1 out of 11 hear me” might make for poetic imagery, but it doesn’t clarify the Gospel—it clouds it.

So here’s my encouragement: anchor your theology in Scripture first, tradition second, and mystical speculation way down the list. Otherwise, you’re not revealing God’s logic—you’re rebranding your own.

—Sincere Seeker. Scripturally savage. Here for the Truth.

1 Like

Hi, sounds like you know what you are saying. You made me finally realize why I took the small yellow bus to school. Because your writing has got to be for the smart people.

Not at all @Corlove13! God forbid.

1 Corinthians 1:26–29 (ESV)
“For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.
But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong;
God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are,
so that no human being might boast in the presence of God.”

→ Paul affirms that the gospel is not reserved for the intellectual elite or the socially powerful, but is aimed at the humble and lowly, the “foolish” in the eyes of the world.

1 Corinthians 2:1–5 (ESV)
“And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom.
For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.
And I was with you in weakness and in fear and much trembling,
and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.”

→ Paul deliberately avoided philosophical eloquence, showing that the gospel’s power is not dependent on human wisdom, but on the Spirit.

Romans 1:16 (ESV)
“For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.”

→ Paul emphasizes the universality of the gospel—accessible to “everyone who believes,” regardless of status, education, or ethnicity.

2 Corinthians 11:3 (ESV)
“But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ.”

→ Paul contrasts complicated deception with the simplicity of devotion to Christ, pointing to the gospel’s accessibility to the sincere and unpretentious.

Galatians 3:1–2 (ESV)
“O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified.
Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?”

→ Even those whom Paul calls “foolish” had received the Spirit—not through intellectual rigor but by simple faith in the crucified Christ.

These verses demonstrate that the gospel message is intentionally suited for the simple and humble. It is not clothed in philosophical sophistication or reserved for the intellectual, but is made powerful through faith, not through cleverness or human credentials.

Shalom to you and family.

Johann.

1 Like

Amen The Omega !! God the Son would be another separate God

It seems clear you haven’t read the article by Sam Shamoun–thank you for confirming.

Johann.

What does an article by someone named Sam Shamoun have to do with the topic?

You’ve got to be kidding me, right? Listening to debates from top-tier apologists–Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, you name it–is actually one of my main hobbies. But every time I mention Bob Utley, it’s like no one’s heard of him. Sam Shamoun? Same reaction. And the thing is, this is directly on topic, brother.

Do yourself a favor and look this up for yourself, no disrespect to you.

#samshamoun #christianity #bible
Shamounian / Sam Shamoun talks about how Jesus became the begotten Son of God is he already existed with the father and is God and eternal and was not created. When we look at the passage in question they quote the verse in psalms where God tells david that today you have become my son and today i have begotten you. Now in the case of david and solomon this was applied to both of then when they sat on the throne who was king of israel but they were already the son of God spiritually through circumcision covenant but when they became king they became the royal son of God and god tells them if they keep his commandments he will make their kingdom last forever but they failed and the leadership was taken away from them then Jesus comes to the scene and is from the line of david who sits on his throne in heaven after his resurrection and becomes the begotten son of God because now he rules over everything and Jesus being sinless keeps all the commandments making his kingdom last forever. So this shows that when Jesus is the begotten son of God it means he is the person who will sit on the throne who is God who is Jesus who is identified as the son who obeyed God and will rule forever.

Shalom.

Johann

Jesus is indeed the son of man and the son of God. Mary is not the mother of God, but she is the mother of deity and flesh and blood. Jesus is the second Adam created without sin as his Father is God. The KJV states Jesus was the son of man 81 times and 41 times was directly from Jesus. God always called Jesus his only BEGOTTEN SON. Jesus always called God in heaven as his Father. Jesus had perfect flesh and blood as a human to become the Lamb of God as the atonement for the Adamic sin. Jesus was tempted by Satan for 40 days; Satan could not and would not dare to tempt God. Jesus is the new Temple of God’s word as the old Temple of God’s word was destroyed. Jesus as a human had a soul just as all humans; his flesh and blood was perfect as the Lamb from God. God’s word INDWELLED the soul of Jesus; Jesus is called the mediator between God and man. Jesus died in the flesh and he gave up the word or ghost just before he died as a human and God’s Lamb of atonement. Jesus had to be human to be the atonement and sacrifice as God nor his word can die. In the Bible, Jesus died in the flesh and his soul went into hades to take captivity captive. Just before he died, "He cried, “My God, my God why have you forsaken me”? Jesus claimed the apostles and us are his brothers; he is right, he was human just like us but his humanity goes back to the dust of the ground, but his human soul and the word of God dwelling in his soul as the Temple of God in heaven. While on the earth, Jesus prayed to the Father 4 or 5 times; God prays to no one. Jesus now sits on the throne in heaven as the Temple of God and as the soul of man. He is the mediator between God and man and also a buffer between God’s annihilation power. Jesus was human and is the Holy Ghost. Jesus indwells all Christian’s souls as the Holy Ghost. God is spirit and is the only heavenly spirit given the title of Holy. There is no other Holy Spirit other than the one God. Only humans have ghost or their essence when they die. God is already spirit from the beginning. The Holy Ghost is used 91 times in the NT and always makes reference to Jesus. The phrase Holy Spirit is God, and the Holy Ghost is the essence of Jesus.

That was just my way of saying He was speaking in another tongue that I could not interpret. I was trying to understand…but He lost me after 4 or 5 sentences.

1 Like

I watch him on youtube, and God logic…He actually is one of the best debaters I’ve ever listen to.
Because He’s read both books and knows the language.

1 Like

And Sam has a photographic memory… sadly, he ended up embracing Catholicism.

Shalom,

Johann.

Brother @Rodace123

Your statement contains several theological assertions that conflict with the apostolic witness as preserved in Scripture and confirmed by the earliest Church testimony. I will address the critical errors using Greek terms and proper biblical exegesis, point by point.

  1. “Mary is not the mother of God”
    This statement contradicts Luke 1:43 where Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, exclaims: “καὶ πόθεν μοι τοῦτο, ἵνα ἔλθῃ ἡ μήτηρ τοῦ Κυρίου μου πρὸς με;” (“And why is this granted to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me?”). The title “κύριος” (Lord) is consistently used in Luke for God Himself (cf. Luke 1:16–17, 1:32, 1:68). To deny Mary as Theotokos (“God-bearer”) is to divide Christ’s person and slip into Nestorianism. The eternal Logos took on flesh (John 1:14: ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο), and Mary bore the person of the Son, not merely his human nature.

  2. “Jesus is the second Adam created without sin”
    Christ is not a created being. John 1:1–3 refutes this: “ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος… καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος… πάντα δι’ αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο” (“In the beginning was the Word… and the Word was God… All things were made through Him”). Colossians 1:16 also states that “ἐν αὐτῷ ἐκτίσθη τὰ πάντα”—all things were created in Him. Jesus, as Logos, is uncreated and consubstantial with the Father (cf. John 17:5).

  3. “Jesus gave up the word or ghost just before he died”
    This phrasing is misleading and theologically incorrect. John 19:30 says “παρέδωκεν τὸ πνεῦμα” (“he gave up the spirit”), not “the Word.” The Word (ὁ λόγος) cannot cease to exist or be “given up.” The human spirit of Jesus was commended to the Father (Luke 23:46), but the Logos did not depart from the body as if detachable. The hypostatic union remained intact even in death.

  4. “Jesus is the Holy Ghost”
    This contradicts Trinitarian teaching. The Holy Spirit (τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον) is not the human essence of Jesus post-mortem, but the third person of the Godhead. In John 14:16–17, Jesus says: “ἐγὼ ἐρωτήσω τὸν Πατέρα, καὶ ἄλλον παράκλητον δώσει ὑμῖν” (“I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper”). The use of ἄλλον (allon, “another”) clearly distinguishes the Holy Spirit from Jesus. The Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26), not from Jesus’ human nature.

  5. “God cannot be tempted” implies Jesus was not God
    James 1:13 says “ὁ θεὸς ἀπείραστός ἐστιν κακῶν” (“God is untemptable by evil”). Yet Hebrews 4:15 affirms that Jesus was “πειρασθέντα κατὰ πάντα καθ’ ὁμοιότητα χωρὶς ἁμαρτίας” (“tempted in all points like as we are, yet without sin”). This points to the mystery of the incarnation: Jesus was tempted according to his human nature, not his divine. The divine nature is impassible, but the human nature assumed by the Logos could experience temptation, suffering, and death.

  6. “Jesus is the Temple of God’s Word”
    John 2:19–21 states: “λύσατε τὸν ναὸν τοῦτον… ἐκείνος δὲ ἔλεγεν περὶ τοῦ ναοῦ τοῦ σώματος αὐτοῦ” (“Destroy this temple… he was speaking of the temple of his body”). Jesus is not the “temple of the Word”—he is the Word made flesh. His human body is the temple in which the divine nature dwells bodily (Colossians 2:9: ἐν αὐτῷ κατοικεῖ πᾶν τὸ πλήρωμα τῆς θεότητος σωματικῶς).

  7. Confusing soul/spirit of Jesus and Word of God
    Nowhere does Scripture teach that “the Word indwelt Jesus’ soul.” Jesus is one divine person with two natures, not a man separately inhabited by God’s Word. That is adoptionism, condemned by the early Church. The union is hypostatic, not mystical possession.

Philippians 2:6–7: “ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων… ἑαυτὸν ἐκένωσεν μορφὴν δούλου λαβών”–He did not become the Word but was in very nature God, who took on flesh.

  1. “Jesus is the buffer of God’s annihilation power”
    This is not only unbiblical but foreign to any apostolic teaching. There is no “buffer” concept in Scripture. Jesus is the mediator (1 Timothy 2:5: μεσίτης), not a cosmic shock absorber. His intercession is personal and priestly (Hebrews 7:25), not metaphysically insulating humans from God.

  2. “Only humans have ghosts… the Holy Ghost is the essence of Jesus”
    This is a confusion of terms. The phrase “Holy Ghost” (ἅγιον πνεῦμα) is used interchangeably with “Holy Spirit” in Greek—there’s no ontological difference between them.

It does not refer to the human soul of Jesus, but to the third person of the Trinity. In Acts 5:3–4, lying to the Holy Spirit is lying to God. He is a person, not a ghostly essence left behind after Jesus’ death.

You have introduced elements of adoptionism, Nestorianism, Sabellianism, and Pneumatomachianism—each of which was condemned by the early Church not based on later tradition but rooted in a careful exegesis of Scripture and the apostolic deposit. The Greek text does not support a dual-personhood in Christ nor the equation of the Holy Spirit with Jesus’ ghost or soul.

I urge you to return to the foundation laid in Scripture, as rightly divided (ὀρθοτομοῦντα τὸν λόγον τῆς ἀληθείας, 2 Timothy 2:15), and receive the full Christ as truly God and truly man, one person in two natures, eternally united and undivided.

Grace and peace to you and family.

Johann.

Hi, good post… I don’t know what the other personally said verbatim. But I do have my view on Holy Ghost (HG) and Holy spirit (HS)
And years ago after trying to study this, I only found a couple of articles online that were fruitful.

One explained: the Holy Ghost being the power of the resurrected body of Christ.
So Holy Spirit before His resurrection.

There was another article…but It took me awhile to find. If interest I know the first one.

I believe there is a difference between Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus in like manner.. one referring before the resurrection the other after.

I was looking into kingdom of God( KOG) and (KOH) too

Eternal life vs life eternal…
The issue of research is from most likely How things are translated.

1 Like