I am done with this conversation. You failed to answer the question as stipulated. You can all wiggle around it all you want to, but I am not the One you will answer to. You do these same things to Christ. Remember that.
Leading others to reinterpret God’s commands according to human desire is no trivial matter; it is a grave responsibility that carries accountability before the Lord. Scripture calls such leaders “blind guides” whose errors cause many to stumble.
See, I tried to answer you in parts but you don’t see to get it, fine, anyways I give the entire answer to you:
The question assumes that morality can be fully separated from God’s design, yet human acts are measured not only by intention but by alignment with the created order. Love, true love, is not merely feeling or affection; it is ordered toward the flourishing of the whole person in accordance with God’s design.
Same-sex relations, by their nature, cannot produce life in the way that God willed the union of man and woman to do, nor can they fully mirror the covenantal, complementary unity that reflects Christ and the Church. Even if love, care, and devotion exist within such a relationship, they are disordered in relation to the ultimate purpose God set for human sexuality and relational complementarity.
To say “they worship God and love God, neighbor, and self” assumes that our acts exist independently of God’s law, as if we can redefine goodness at will. But love of God is not merely subjective devotion; it entails obedience to His ordering of creation. Love of neighbor is not merely affection but participation in the good God intended for them. Love of self is not mere self-pleasure but seeking the fulfillment of the soul in God’s plan.
Thus, homosexual acts represent a misalignment with God’s design for love, not because the individuals are incapable of feeling affection, but because the acts themselves cannot fully participate in the covenantal, life-giving, ordered love that God calls humanity to. Love divorced from God’s created order becomes incomplete, limited, and ultimately misdirected.
In short, even the purest affection, without adherence to God’s design, cannot constitute true love as defined by Him. Worshiping God and loving in ways that contravene His created order is like offering a beautiful gift that is broken at its foundation: the heart may be present, but the act itself cannot fulfill the purpose God ordained.
God’s design is based in Love. You failed to explain how honosexuality stands against the Commandment of Love. You make all kinds of exagerated man made answers using Scripture. But you cannot answer the question. Clearly.
what answer do you want to hear, sir, I will write the answer you like, just tell me what is your idea
The question is clearly printed above.
Wiggle wiggle, you still avoid the question. The twisting is evident. Why should I answer questions when you clearly wont?
tell me your answer, and I will read it, because what do you want to hear
Brother, I have answered your question with the God-breathed Scriptures—Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:26–27, 1 Corinthians 6:9–10, 1 Timothy 1:8–11
If you see a ‘twist,’ I invite you to demonstrate specifically where the text deviates from the original meaning, instead of dismissing it. Until then, I stand on the Word of God as it was given.
Wiggle wiggle, avoid avoid.
You only hurt yourself by persisting in this false manner.
Blessed be, in Christ. I am done for the day.
Oh man, wow, I like this, I will say this to others when I dont agree with them, thanks for this
Blessings to you, brother. I accept your leaving the discussion for today. I stand on the God-breathed Scriptures I have shared and will continue to reflect on them faithfully. May the Lord guide us both in His truth, in humility and love.
No no, not becauae you disagreed. Let’s not twist events too.
It is because you chose to avoid my question. Persistently. Because you could not answer a very basic question as stipulated, without using circular logic such as proving the Bible is all God’s Word because it says so (in one piece that was added to the whole.) And as unerring as it may be, not everything done by humans within the covers was innitiated by God or praised by God.
You cannot prove that homosexuality, or homosexual behavior in a committed relationship goes against the Commandment to Love as Christ Ordered. You have absolutely no case against them except for some old laws written by man and attributed to God. No proof. And as I said, as God claims no Authorship of all the actions, misdeeds, and events orchestrated by man in the Bible, neither does He claim Authorship of all their laws. But as Christ clarifies, all that is truly of God aligns with the Law of Love. That which does not is not of God. Its weeds. .
As Jeremiah said, the Scribes lied. As Christ said, Woe to those teachers of the Law who themselves are not getting in. Yoo have no case against your fellow man and yet you persist to stoke the ire of God when you could spend your time serving God.
And those inclined toward wickedness will dwell in those weeds, while those with a heart transformed by Christ will focus on the wheat. This is God’s test of your heart
Byeeeee
1 Like
Thanks for the clarification
I didnt understand, so Leviticus is not from God, but man wrote?
Help me to understand what you are saying:
Lev 18 begins with The Lord said to Moses, 2 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘I am the Lord your God
verse 22 says Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.
So you are saying that it doesnt come from God, help me to understand so that I may not mistake you
Answer my question and we shall see together.
If thats the case, as you told, there is no objection I can find to homosexuality, because I feel you are saying Leviticus isnt from God, and other Paul’s letters arent a part of scriptures, then I have no ground acc to what you have said
I removed several off-topic posts.
Please keep it on topic.
Please direct any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this action to me in DM or to community@salemwebnetwork.com.
Please do not reply to me in this thread regarding these actions.
Does a committed homosexual relationship go against Christ’s Command to Love? Your writing is blaming me and I do not appteciate that.
Thats why im asking you to clarify, I didnt blame you, i asked “Are you saying…”
anyways
Yes, brother, if homosexuality is sin, then a committed homosexual relationship is indeed against Christ’s command to love. For to truly love Christ with all one’s heart, one cannot treat what He calls sin as normal or acceptable. Even if someone presumes to love Christ while persisting in sin, they fail to honor Him fully. True love of Christ is always accompanied by obedience and repentance, not self-justification.
Man tends to twist the Word of God, but the Love Command of Christ corrects it.
How does it go against the Love Command? Just explain how you have been unloved? How has God been unloved?