@Pater15
I hear you; you make some profound points; concepts I’m going to continue to consider and weigh. It seems auspicious that I am in these two contrasting conversations right now. Not that I hold both points of view equally, I surely don’t, but that The Lord is exposing me to, and helping me to understand these two very different world views at the same time. I am being stretched, and I’m wondering about the limits of my elasticity. I am a simple man; I have not studied the great thinkers academically. I make my novice attempt at understanding the basic principles and tenants of philosophy, metaphysics, science, and the various forms of theology, but personally I rely on The Word of God, and His POV (humbly, as best as I can discern it, through His Son, and with His assistance from His Spirit). I am still very much the student, and do not profess to be a teacher (although I am often thrust into that position unintentionally).
As I stated previously, I understand the popular tenets of Maslow, but I also weigh his theories in his personal context; ideas coming from an immigrant Jew, whose family fled Ukrainian persecution. Addressing human needs was more than just academic theory to him, I’m sure, but more likely a deeply internal (visceral) way in which he neurologically processed his own family history. (I may be wrong). Maslow developed his world view from a monotheistic basis, but still without the assistance of Jesus, (as far as we know) and without the indwelling of God’s Holy Spirit. That does not make him wrong, but it does give us a context from which to best understand his proposals. Maslow’s trajectory for man was for him to become the best version of himself, (which he defines as the freedom to be creative, maximizing one’s potential, and experiencing “peak experiences” of joy and satisfaction), but only through the necessary processes of meeting the lower three (or four) tiers of needs.
The problem I run into with Maslow, for the Christian, is that Jesus taught His disciples a new, and very different trajectory (in this mortal life anyway), he taught them a trajectory that aimed at poverty, service, submission, obscurity, and menial living. He taught these principles both in word, and by example. “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head." (Matt. 8:20), etc.
Jesus taught His disciples to not “worry” about the lowest tier “Are not two sparrows sold for a copper coin? And not one of them falls to the ground apart from your Father’s will. But the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Do not fear therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows.” (Matt. 10:29-31). Jesus taught His disciples to disregard the second tier (safety) “So they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name.” (Acts 5:41), etc. Jesus taught His disciples a new paradigm of Love, and His supernatural providence of a super-human ability to truly love as God loves, with an almost apparent disregard for yourself. Jesus avoided celebrity, recognition, and even though He possessed the strength to still storms, remediate lifelong illness, raise some from mortal death, and feed thousands from scraps, He didn’t use that strength to ease His own life, or the lives of His disciples (that includes you and I), but rather promised them a sacrificial life of suffering, being hated, and violent persecution. And regarding self-actualization, Jesus regularly taught His disciples, in the kingdom of God, the first shall be last and the last shall be first; not “self”, but Heavenly-actualization” of sorts.
I’m thinking more about this statement you made:
I hear you, but I’m going to have to think about this a bit more. This is the first time I have encountered this idea. I understand your hesitation: “I don’t know if I’m completely sold”. This is a difficult, but important concept from which to hear from God. I’m going to listen a while longer before I comment on this idea.
I hear your definition of “psychological egoism.”, and I assume it is correct for the secular world to understand the reality of “wrong” in this way. But you inadvertently bring up another question, or actually split our topic into two questions: (1) Why do people sin? and (2) Why do Christian’s sin? I am now contemplating that the two questions may share some commonalities, but may not share a single answer.
I understand your statement:
And I agree with you here. Our own interest being met is definitely the case, but in Christ, self-interest ceases to be our primary motivation (in my experience). Agape love inspires me to be primarily concerned for the Glory of God (God’s interests) as He is reciprocally and sacrificially demonstrating His Holy concern for mine.
I appreciate your thoughts. I’m still thinking about them, and growing from them.
In Jesus
KP
P.S. When replying directly to me, please use the grey “Reply” button at the bottom of my post. When replying to the group, you can use the blue “Reply” button at the bottom of the thread. The only difference is that I get notified of a direct reply, and the thread keeps track of the conversation. Either way, everyone gets to read everything, it just keeps things neater.
Thanx
KP