Brother
Opening Salvo:
Your formulation—“Rebirth from Baptism through the soul for the spirit in the immortal flesh”—tries to wrap ancient-sounding mystery around a cocktail of unscriptural confusion.
- Rebirth is from the Spirit, not Baptismal Waters (John_3:5–8)
You assert: “Rebirth from Baptism…”
But the Lord said:
John 3:5–6 “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit (ἐξ ὕδατος καὶ πνεύματος), he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.”
The phrase ἐξ ὕδατος καὶ πνεύματος does not imply sacramental baptism as the regenerating agent but refers to the purifying work of the Spirit (cf. Ezek_36:25–27).
The preposition ἐξ (genitive) marks source, not ritual act. Regeneration does not come from the waters but from the Spirit.
Titus 3:5 “He saved us… by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit.”
Verb: ἔσωσεν (aorist active indicative 3rd singular from σῴζω)—decisive divine act, not mediated through a rite but through mercy and Spirit.
- Soul-for-Spirit Swapping Is Gnostic, Not Apostolic
You said: “through the soul for the spirit”
This vague preposition play has no scriptural warrant. The ψυχή (soul) is not a conduit for the spirit. Hebrews 4:12 declares:
Hebrews 4:12 “…dividing soul and spirit…”
Greek: ψυχῆς καὶ πνεύματος—clearly distinct terms, not interchangeable parts of one fluid metaphysical process.
Furthermore, 1 Thess_5:23 distinguishes the tripartite man:
“May your whole spirit and soul and body be kept blameless…”
This utterly dismantles your fusionistic language.
- The Flesh Is Not “Immortal” Yet (1 Cor_15:53)
You wrote: “in the immortal flesh”
But Scripture declares plainly:
1 Corinthians 15:53 “For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality.”
Greek: τὸ φθαρτὸν… τὸ ἀφθαρσίαν… τὸ θνητὸν… ἀθανασίαν
All future tense–this transformation is eschatological, not realized. Claiming immortal flesh now contradicts Paul’s teaching.
- “Saved from Sacrifice through Penance”? Foreign to Apostolic Gospel
You said: “Saved from Sacrifice through Penance…”
Yet Scripture teaches we are saved by Christ’s sacrifice, not from it, and not through penance.
Hebrews 10:10 “We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.”
διὰ τῆς προσφορᾶς τοῦ σώματος τοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ—not through penance, not through rituals, but through His once-for-all substitutionary offering.
Greek Verb: ἡγιασμένοι (perfect passive participle from ἁγιάζω)–completed, God-initiated holiness rooted in Christ’s death.
- “Holy Spirit Incorruption in the Body”? Only in the Resurrection
You said: “Holy Spirit Incorruption in The Body…”
But incorruption (ἀφθαρσία) is not presently manifest in our bodies. Paul groans for it.
Romans 8:23 “…we groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.”
We do not now possess incorruption in the body, but await it at the resurrection (cf. Phil_3:21).
- “Becoming again One Holy Spirit Family”? Not Scriptural Language
You ended with: “One Holy Spirit Family One God in being.”
Nowhere in Scripture is the redeemed called a “Holy Spirit Family.” Believers are called sons, heirs, saints, body, bride, but never a Holy Spirit Family.
Furthermore, your phrase “One God in being” echoes creedal metaphysics, but Scripture never speaks of believers becoming part of the ontological divine essence (cf. Isa_42:8, Rom_1:25).
2 Peter 1:4 speaks of κοινωνοὶ θείας φύσεως (“partakers of the divine nature”), but this is moral likeness, not metaphysical fusion.
Your phraseology draws more from mystical synthesis and pseudo-sacramental Gnosticism than from the grammar of the Gospel.
Baptism follows regeneration (Acts_10:44–48), penance cannot purchase salvation (Eph_2:8–9), and incorruptible flesh is not present but promised (1 Cor_15:52–54).
Peace is found in the cross, not in mystical phrases.
Galatians 6:14 “Far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ…”
Shalom.
Johann.